Skip to main content

Liberalism and Political Obligation: Debating the Remits of State Intervention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
COVID-19 and International Political Theory

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

Brown turns in this chapter to consider the situation of liberalism in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. He approaches the issue through the paradigm of Political Obligation, exploring in particular the hesitancy of liberalism to accept greater State intervention through engagement primarily with the thought of Schmitt and Green. As an answer to this problem, Brown ultimately recommends a new ‘hermeneutic’ approach to liberalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, R. J. (2019). Political encounters: A hermeneutic inquiry into the situation of political obligation. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, B. (2001). The philosophical theory of the state. Batoche Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, J. D. (2018). Hermeneutics: Facts and interpetation in the age of information. Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (2012). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Eds.). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (1986a). Lectures on the principles of political obligation. In P. Harris & J. Morrow (Eds.), T.H. Green: Lectures on the principles of political obligation and other writings. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (1986b). Lectures on liberal legislation and freedom of contract. In P. Harris & J. Morrow (Eds.), T.H. Green: Lectures on the principles of political obligation and other writings. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (2003). Temperance and freedom. In P. Nicholson (Ed.), T. H. Green: Miscellaneous writings, speeches and letters. Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and time (T. Carmen, Ed.). Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1839). The Leviathan. In W. Molesworth (Ed.), The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Vol. 3). Bohn, Digitalised by The Online Library of Liberty. https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/hobbes-the-english-works-vol-iii-leviathan. Accessed 25 Aug 2021, Accessed 15 Dec 2021.

  • Hobbes, T. (1990). Behemoth: Or the long parliament (S. Holes, Ed.). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsingen L. M., Refsum E., & Gjøstein, D. K. et. al. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden—threats, trust, and impact on daily life: A comparative survey. BMC Public Health, 20(1597).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. (2010). Political obligation. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, C. (2020). Sweden’s second wave is a failure of government—and guidance. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/18/sweden-second-covid-wave-failure-of-government-guidance/. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

  • Koselleck, R. (2018), Sediments of Time: On Possible Future Histories, (Franzel S. and Hoffmann S. Ed.). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1764). Two treatises of government (T. Hollis, Ed.). A. Millar et al., Digitalised by The Online Library of Liberty. https://oll.libertyfund.org/page/john-locke-two-treatises-1689. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

  • Marder, M. (2012). Groundless existence the political ontology of Carl Schmitt. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A. J. (1986). The common good and rights in T.H. Green’s ethical and political theory. In A. Vincent (Ed.), The philosophy of T.H. Green. Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (2008). On Liberty. In J. Gray (Ed.), John Stuart Mill: On liberty and other essays. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1968). The social contract (M. Cranston, Ed.). Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology, Schwab G. (ed.), Chicago: Univeristy of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1940). The Führer protects the law. Picker C.T. and J.P. McCormick J.P., Arplan: Left Meets Right, East Meets West. https://arplan.org/2019/06/15/schmitt-fuhrer-law/. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

  • Schmitt, C. (1996). The Leviathan in the state theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and failure of a political symbol (G. Schwab, Trans.). Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2009). Carl Schmitt and the politic of hostility, violence and terror. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Xu, F. (2020). Ignorance, orientalism and sinophobia in knowledge production on COVID-19. Journal of Economic and Human Geography, 111(3), 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruairidh Brown .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brown, R. (2022). Liberalism and Political Obligation: Debating the Remits of State Intervention. In: COVID-19 and International Political Theory. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91952-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics