Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Evaluation of the Conceptual Validity of Vowel Blindness as an Explanation for Differences in Arabic Readers’ L2 Word Recognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Individual and Contextual Factors in the English Language Classroom

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 24))

  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

In an influential study, Ryan and Meara (Read Foreign Lang. 7(2):531–540, 1991) posited that errors in the L2 reading and writing of L1 Arabic learners could be due to vowel blindness: a reduced sensitivity to written vowels deriving from the learners’ L1 Arabic reading experience. Vowel blindness is frequently cited as a cross-linguistic effect influencing the L2 reading and writing outcomes of Arabic learners, yet its conceptual validity has rarely been scrutinised. This article evaluates the validity of the theory as an explanation for differences in L1 Arabic readers’ written word recognition of languages with alphabetic writing systems. The empirical studies included in this review were identified in a systematic scoping review of Arabic L2 word recognition of alphabetic writing systems (reported in Allmark N. A systematic scoping review of evidence pertaining to L2 word recognition among L1 readers of Arabic and its implications for the validity of vowel blindness. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, 2019) whose methodology is summarised in this chapter. The review demonstrates that the current, published evidence is too limited and conflicting to validate vowel blindness. Furthermore, the included studies have methodological weaknesses that limit the overall trustworthiness of their findings. Further research is therefore needed before this phenomenon can be accepted as a factor in poor word recognition among Arabic learners. Recommendations are made for future avenues of research that could improve our understanding of either word recognition or the validity of vowel blindness, and for raising the methodological standards of research in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1996). The role of vowels and context in the reading of highly skilled native Arabic speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(6), 629–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1997a). The need for cross-cultural considerations in reading theory: The effects of Arabic sentence context in skilled and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1997b). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Different orthographies different context effects: The effects of Arabic sentence context in skilled and poor readers. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271950160101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Reading in Arabic orthography: Characteristics, research findings, and assessment. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 321–338). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Juhani, E. A. (2015). The sensitivity to vowels vs. consonants in English words: The case of Arabic ESL learners. Retrieved from https://prezi.com/tgjakr0yjfbv/the-sensitivity-to-vowels-vs-consonants-in-english-words-t/

  • Alghamdi, H. (2015). Vowel blindness: A critical review. In Proceedings of the 8th Saudi Students conference. Imperial College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhawary, M. T. (2011). Modern standard Arabic grammar: A learner’s guide. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhazmi, K., Milton, J., & Johnston, S. (2019). Examining ‘vowel blindness’ among native Arabic speakers reading English words from the perspective of eye-tracking. System, 80, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allmark, N. (2019). A systematic scoping review of evidence pertaining to L2 word recognition among L1 readers of Arabic and its implications for the validity of vowel blindness. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsadoon, R., & Heift, T. (2015). Textual input enhancement for vowel blindness: A study with Arabic ESL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem-based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 31–54). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., Ijzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., Grangef, J. A., Peruginig, M., Spiesh, J. R., & van’t Veer, A. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50(1), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. L., & Haynes, M. (2005). Individual differences in second language learning. The development of reading skills. New Directions for Child Development, 27, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunton, G., Stansfield, C., Caird, J., & Thomas, J. (2012). Finding relevant studies. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed., pp. 93–122). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.108.1.204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V., & Bassetti, B. (2005). Second language writing systems. Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. T. (2013). The Arabic writing system. In J. Owens (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics (pp. 412–432). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussias, P. E. (2019). Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051000005X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Effective Public Health Practice Project. (1998). Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Canadian Health Care.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). Why is it hard to read Arabic? In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 77–96). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., & Ganayim, D. (2004). Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fender, M. (2008). Arabic literacy development and cross-linguistic effects in subsequent L2 literacy development. In K. Koda & A. M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development (pp. 101–124). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. WORD, 15(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic systems and skilled word recognition processes in reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 272–295). Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). Commonality and diversity in reviews. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed., pp. 35–65). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, F. (2015). Word recognition research in foreign language reading: A systematic review. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 10, 57–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. F. (2010). Word recognition in Arabic as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01094.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. F. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 55–76). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Harb, R. (2006). Native speakers of Arabic and ESL texts: Evidence for the transfer of written word identification processes. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2012). The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T. R., Almabruk, A. A. A., McGowan, V. A., & Paterson, K. B. (2011). Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: The evidence from Arabic. Cortex, 47(8), 992–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost, L. Katz, & M. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Elsevier Science & Technology.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80(iv), 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O., Aram, D., Hassunha-Arafat, S., Iraki, H. H.-Y., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2014). Mother-child literacy activities and early literacy in the Israeli Arab family. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 323–347). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liabo, K., Gough, D., & Harden, A. (2017). Developing justifiable evidence claims. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed., pp. 251–277). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68(2), 321–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masrai, A., & Milton, J. (2018). The role of informal learning activities in improving L2 lexical access and acquisition in L1 Arabic speakers learning EFL. The Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1520655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B. (2018). Models of lexical access and morphological processing. In E. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 240–268). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, J. (2014). The effect of diglossia on literacy in Arabic and other languages. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 197–223). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nassaji, H. (2014). The role and importance of lower-level processes in second language Reading. Language Teaching, 47(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan – A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(210). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

  • Perfetti, C., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Epilogue: Universals and particulars in learning to read across seventeen orthographies. In L. Verhoeven & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 2018–2028). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A., & Meara, P. (1991). The case of the invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7(2), 531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A., & Meara, P. M. (1996). A diagnostic test for vowel blindness in Arabic speaking learners of English. Lognostics. Retrieved from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/vlibrary/arpm96.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryding, K. C. (2013). Second-language acquisition. In J. Owens (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics (pp. 392–411). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). MAWRID: A model of Arabic word reading in development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(5), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417720460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Joshi, R. M. (2014). Foreword. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. v–xiv). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 225–240). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saigh, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Difficulties with vocabulary word form: The case of Arabic ESL learners. System, 40(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., & Rebaï, M. (2006). Orthographic transparency and grapheme-phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers. Brain Research, 1104(1), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. E. (2010). Sensitivity to consonantal context in reading English vowels: The case of Arabic learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis, Memphis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. (2015). Researching reading. In A. Paltridge & B. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 315–334). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, N., Witzel, J., & Forster, K. (2012). Comparisons of online reading paradigms: Eye tracking, moving-window and maze. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9179-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is deeply indebted to Hamish Chalmers at the University of Oxford’s Department of Education for his input and supervision during the systematic review that informed this chapter, and to Ailsa Campbell for her dedicated work as co-screener and research assistant during the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

    Ndrew Allmark

  2. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Ndrew Allmark

Authors
  1. Ndrew Allmark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ndrew Allmark .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of the Sultan Qaboos University Council, Muscat, Oman

    Rahma Al-Mahrooqi

  2. Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor for Postgraduate Studies and Research, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

    Christopher J. Denman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Allmark, N. (2022). An Evaluation of the Conceptual Validity of Vowel Blindness as an Explanation for Differences in Arabic Readers’ L2 Word Recognition. In: Al-Mahrooqi, R., Denman, C.J. (eds) Individual and Contextual Factors in the English Language Classroom. English Language Education, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91881-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91881-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91880-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91881-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation