Skip to main content

Advanced Analytics for Surface Mining

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Analytics in Mining Engineering

Abstract

Surface extracting is the most widely used mining method globally. Surface mining can be divided into open-pit and open-cut methods of metal and coal mining. The surface mining will be more complicated when the depth of the pit increases, and the miners need to go deeper to reach the ore. Advanced analytics and using the new technology can potentially help mining companies find a cost-effective way to extract material. However, using advanced analytics needs fundamental requirements, such as a modern data collection system. In addition, applying advanced analytics is useful in different aspects such as prediction and optimization. This chapter tries to clarify the role of advanced analytics to improve surface mining operations, including design, plan, load, haul, crush, and equipment maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dutta, S., et al. 2010. Machine learning algorithms and their application to ore reserve estimation of sparse and imprecise data. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications 2 (02): 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali, D., and S. Frimpong. 2020. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and process automation: Existing knowledge frontier and way forward for the mining sector. Artificial Intelligence Review 53 (8): 6025–6042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martins, P., and A. Soofastaei. 2020. Making decisions based on analytics. In Data analytics applied to the mining industry, 193–221. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zadeh, L. 1965. Fuzzy collection. Information and Control 8: 338–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali, D., et al. 2018. An evaluation of machine learning and artificial intelligence models for predicting the flotation behavior of fine high-ash coal. Advanced Powder Technology 29 (12): 3493–3506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Öztaş, O., A. Başçetin, and A. Kanli. 2006. EQS: A computer software using fuzzy logic for equipment selection in mining engineering. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 106 (1): 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bazzazi, A.A., M. Osanloo, and B. Karimi. 2011. A new fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for open-pit mines equipment selection. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 28 (03): 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ozkan, E., M. Iphar, and A. Konuk. 2019. Fuzzy logic approach in resource classification. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation, and Environment 33 (3): 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandopadhyay, S., and A. Chattopadhyay. 1986. Selection of post-mining uses of land via fuzzy algorithm. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on the Application of Computers in Mine Planning (APCOM), SME/AIME.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kommadath, B., R. Sarkar, and B. Rath. 2012. A fuzzy logic-based approach to assess sustainable development of the mining and minerals sector. Sustainable Development 20 (6): 386–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bangian, A., et al. 2011. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy processing to define optimum post-mining land use for pit area to clarify reclamation costs. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi 27: 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anis, M., et al. 2017. Fuzzy logic approach for post-mining land use planning: A case study on coal mine of Pt. Adaro Indonesia-South Kalimantan. Indonesian Mining Journal 20 (2): 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rehman, A.U., et al. 2020. Effect of text message alerts on miners evacuation decisions. Safety Science 130: 104875.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iphar, M., and A.K. Cukurluoz. 2020. Fuzzy risk assessment for mechanized underground coal mines in Turkey. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 26 (2): 256–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghafoor, A., et al. 2019. ETNAC design enabling formation flight at liberation points. In The 2019 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ghafoor, A., S. Balakrishnan, and T. Yucelen. 2018. Modified state observer-based decentralized neuroadaptive controller for large-scale interconnected uncertain systems. In The 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ruff, T. 2002. Hazard detection and warning devices: safety enhancement for off-highway dump trucks. In Compendium of NIOSH research.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ruff, T., P. Coleman, and L. Martini. 2011. Machine-related injuries in the US mining industry and priorities for safety research. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 18 (1): 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aldinger, J., J. Kenney, and C. Keran. 1995. Mobile equipment accidents in surface coal mines. Information circular/1995. Twin Cities, MN: Bureau of Mines, Twin Cities Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  20. MSHA. 2019. Mine injury and worktime.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mukhopadhjay, A. 1989. Selection, maintenance, and relations of various parameters for off-highway hauling tires. In Off-highway haulage in surface mines, ed. T.S. Golosinski, and V. Srajer, 153–159. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parreira, J. 2013. An interactive simulation model to compare an autonomous haulage truck system with a manually-operated system. University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Soofastaei, A. 2020. Digital transformation of mining. In Data analytics applied to the mining industry, 1–29. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ali, D. 2016. Mechanics of impulse force reduction for mitigating dump truck vibrations under HISLO conditions. Missouri University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soofastaei, A., et al. 2016. A comprehensive investigation of loading variance influence fuel consumption and gas emissions in mine haulage operation. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 26 (6): 995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ali, D., and S. Frimpong. 2018. Artificial intelligence models for predicting the performance of hydro-pneumatic suspension struts in large capacity dump trucks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dindarloo, S.R. 2016. Dynamic impact of aging dump truck suspension systems on whole-body vibrations in high-impact shovel loading operations. Missouri University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ali, D., and S. Frimpong. 2021. DeepImpact: A deep learning model for whole-body vibration control using impact force monitoring. Neural Computing and Applications 33 (8): 3521–3544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bullock, D.M., and I.J. Oppenheim. 1989. A laboratory study of force-cognitive excavation. In Proceedings of Sixth International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gocho, T. 1992. Automatic wheel-loader in the asphalt plant. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shi, X., Lever, P.J., Wang, F-Y. 1996. Experimental robotic excavation with fuzzy logic and neural networks. In: Robotics and Automation, 1996. Proceedings., 1996 IEEE International Conference. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hainsworth, D. 1996. Dragline automation. Australian coal association research program project report (C3007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rezazadeh Azar, E., S. Dickinson, and B. McCabe. 2013. Server-customer interaction tracker: Computer vision-based system to estimate dirt-loading cycles. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 139 (7): 785–794.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Memarzadeh, M., M. Golparvar-Fard, and J.C. Niebles. 2013. Automated 2D detection of construction equipment and workers from site video streams using histograms of oriented gradients and colors. Automation in Construction 32: 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Golparvar-Fard, M., A. Heydarian, and J.C. Niebles. 2013. Vision-based action recognition of earthmoving equipment using spatio-temporal features and support vector machine classifiers. Advanced Engineering Informatics 27 (4): 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wei, Z., Q.-X. Cai, and S.-Z. Chen. 2007. Study on dragline-bulldozer operation with variations in coal seam thickness. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology 17 (4): 464–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Somua-Gyimah, G., et al. 2019. A computer vision system for terrain recognition and object detection tasks in mining and construction environments. In SME Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pekol, A. 2019. Evaluation and risk analysis of open-pit mining operations. BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte 164 (6): 232–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nehring, M., et al. 2018. A comparison of strategic mine planning approaches for in-pit crushing and conveying, and truck/shovel systems. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 28 (2): 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thompson, R. 2010. Mine haul road design and management best practices for safe and cost-efficient truck haulage. In Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration 2010 Conference Proceedings. Pre-print. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tennant, D., and B. Regensburg. 2001. Guidelines for mine haul road design.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thompson, R. 2011. 10.6 Design, construction, and maintenance of haul roads. In SME mining engineering handbook, vol. 1, 957–977. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Elam, R., E. Teaster, and M. Lawless. 1999. Haul road inspection handbook. MSHA handbook series. Handbook number PH99-I-4. Arlington, VA: US Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hustrulid, W.A., M. Kuchta, and R.K. Martin. 2013. Open pit mine planning and design, two-volume set & CD-ROM pack. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Baek, J., and Y. Choi. 2017. A new method for haul road design in open-pit mines to support efficient truck haulage operations. Applied Sciences 7 (7): 747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghafoor, A., et al. 2018. Event-triggered neuro-adaptive controller (ETNAC) design for uncertain linear systems. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danish Ali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ali, D. (2022). Advanced Analytics for Surface Mining. In: Soofastaei, A. (eds) Advanced Analytics in Mining Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91589-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91589-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91588-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91589-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics