Skip to main content

Conceptualising a Model for Meaningful Digital Pedagogy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 13117))

Abstract

This action research aims to develop practices for the teacher education practicum that can support and encourage the collaborative planning of digital technology integration in teaching by university teacher educators and student teachers and supervising in-service teachers. More specifically, this study seeks to identify the features that make the pedagogical use of digital technologies meaningful. The background arises from the need to find ways to develop technology-enhanced pedagogy that encourages student teachers to engage in lifelong collaborative learning. We use the technology integrated matrix (TIM) as a theoretical frame-work and in the content analysis. The data collection took place during a primary school teacher education practicum period and involved teacher educators (N = 5), student teachers (N = 10), and classroom teachers (N = 5) in Finland. The results indicate that the pedagogical use of digital technologies needs to be considered throughout the teaching process: in the planning phase, action phase, and evaluation phase. Based on the results, we identify the key features of meaningful digital pedagogy to form a model that supports the codevelopment of digital pedagogical solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ausubel, D.: The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. Grune and Stratton, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burns, D.: Assessing Impact in Dynamic and Complex Environments: Systemic Action Research and Participatory Systemic Inquiry. CDI Practice Paper 8. IDS, Brighton (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Craig, D.V.: Introduction to Action Research. Action Research Essentials, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission ET2020 Working Group on Schools Policy, Shaping career-long perspectives on teaching: a guide on policies to improve initial teacher education, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/reports/initial-teacher-education_en.pdf. Accessed 09 Jul 2021

  6. Finnish National Agency for Education: Distance education in Finland during the COVID-19 crisis Finland (2020). https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/distance-education-in-finland-during-covid19initial-observations.pdf. Accessed 09 Jul 2021

  7. Finnish National Board of Education: National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Next Print Oy (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Florida Center for Instructional Technology: Technology Integration Matrix (2019). https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/. Accessed 1 June 2019

  9. Hakkarainen, P., Saarelainen, T., Ruokamo, H.: Towards meaningful learning through digital video supported, case based teaching. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 23(1), 87–109 (2007). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harmes, J.C., Welsh, J.L., Winkelman, R.J.: A framework for defining and evaluating technology integration in the instruction of real-world skills. In: Ferrara, S., Rosen, Y., Tager, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Technology Tools for Real-world Skill Development, pp. 137–162. IGI Global, Hershey (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heikonen, L., Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., Soini, T.: Student-teachers’ strategies in classroom interaction in the context of the teaching practicum. J. Educ. Teach. 43(5), 534–549 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1355080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonassen, D.H., Strobel, J.: Modeling for meaningful learning. In: Hung, D., Khine, M.S. (eds.) Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_1

  13. Keskitalo, T., Pyykkö, E., Ruokamo, H.: Exploring the meaningful learning of students in second life. Educ. Technol. Soc. 14(1), 16–26 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kimav, A.U., Aydin, B.: A blueprint for in-service teacher training program in technology integration. J. Educ. Technol. Online Learn. 3(3), 224–244 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ledford, D.M.: Development of a Professional Learning Framework to Improve Teacher Practice in Technology Integration. Boise State University Theses and Dissertations (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lähdesmäki, S., Valli, P.: Bridging authentic learning task into technology supported transformative pedagogy in Finnish teacher training. In: Chova, L.G., Martínez, A.L., Torres, I.C. (eds.) EDULEARN18 Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, pp. 5857–5863. IATED Academy (2018). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.1409

  17. Næsheim-Bjørkvik, G., Helgevold, N., Østrem, S.: Lesson study as a professional tool to strengthen collaborative enquiry in mentoring sessions in initial teacher education. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 42(5), 557–573 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1641487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saarinen, A.: Equality in Cognitive Learning Outcomes: The Roles of Educational Practices. University of Helsinki, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Helsinki Studies in Education, number 97 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sailin, S., Mahmor, N.: Improving student teachers’ digital pedagogy through meaningful learning activities. Malays. J. Learn. Instr. 15(2), 143–173 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Väätäjä, J.O., Ruokamo, H.: Conceptualizing dimensions and a model for digital pedagogy. J. Pac. Rim Psychol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921995395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wadmany, R., Kliachko, S.: The significance of digital pedagogy: teachers’ perceptions and the factors influencing their abilities as digital pedagogues. J. Educ. Technol. 11(3), 22–33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Welsh, J., Harmes, J.C., Winkelman, R.: Florida’s technology integration matrix. Princ. Leadersh. 12(2), 69–71 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satu-Maarit Frangou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Väätäjä, J., Frangou, SM. (2021). Conceptualising a Model for Meaningful Digital Pedagogy. In: Huang, YM., Lai, CF., Rocha, T. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13117. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91540-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91540-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91539-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91540-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics