Skip to main content

The “New Constitutionalism” in 187 Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Judges and the Language of Law
  • 211 Accesses

Abstract

Constitutions are both a cause of, and solution to, indeterminacies in public discourse. They are central to our understanding of state power, civic freedom, and, hence, policy influence for judges. This chapter finds evidence of a “new constitutionalism” that has been theorised (Stone Sweet, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; Gill and Cutler, New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014). We will be searching through the contents and language in all available constitutions to uncover what, in fact, is “new”, and what might be considered to have been “older” approaches to constituting a polity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Of course, non-binary classifications of executive type also exist. See, in particular, Siaroff (2003).

  2. 2.

    A notable exception being Lijphart (2012).

  3. 3.

    See theoretical work on post-structuralism and discourse analysis in, for example, Lyotard et al. (2006).

  4. 4.

    Data for these comparisons was obtained from the Comparative Constitutions Project and Constitute Project from https://comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/ccp-rankings/, accessed from September 2018 to September 2021. See also Elkins et al. (2014).

  5. 5.

    Data from the World Bank.

References

  • Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Kelly. 2015. Complexity and Creative Capacity: Rethinking Knowledge Transfer, Adaptive Management and Wicked Environmental Problems. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, James Melton, Robert Shaffer, Juan F. Sequeda, and Daniel P. Miranker. 2014. Constitute: The World’s Constitutions to Read, Search, and Compare. Journal of Web Semantics 27: 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 1995. Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process. Duke Law Journal 45 (2): 364–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, John, Frances Rosenbluth, and Charles Shipan. 2007. Comparative Judicial Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan Stokes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen, and A. Claire Cutler. 2014. New Constitutionalism and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Mark A. 2006. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 2009. The Federalist Papers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Donald L. 2002. Constitutional Design: Proposals versus Processes. In The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, ed. Andrew Reynolds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. London: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammen, Michael G. 1986. A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Hanna. 2010. Constitution-Writing in Deeply Divided Societies: The Incrementalist Approach. Nations and Nationalism 16 (1): 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, Richard, and Michael Piore. 2004. Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die: What History Tells Us About Our Future. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François, Keith Crome, and James Williams. 2006. The Lyotard Reader and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, John, and Brendan O’Leary. 2007. Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: Liberal Consociation as Political Prescription. International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (4): 670–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, James, Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg, and Kalev Leetaru. 2013. On the Interpretability of Law: Lessons from the Decoding of National Constitutions. British Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prempeh, H. Kwasi. 2007. Africa’s ‘Constitutionalism Revival’: False Start or New Dawn? Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (3): 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, Alan. 2010. The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William H. 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockmore, Daniel, Chen Fang, Nicholas Foti, Tom Ginsberg, and David Krakauer. 2017. The Cultural Evolution of National Constitutions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69 (3): 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siaroff, Alan. 2003. Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political Research 42: 287–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Alfred. 2001. Toward a New Comparative Politics of Federalism, (Multi)Nationalism, and Democracy: Beyond Rikerian Federalism. In Arguing Comparative Politics, ed. Stepan Alfred. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, David G. 2004. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Alec. 1992. Where Judicial Politics Are Legislative Politics: The French Constitutional Council. West European Politics 15 (3): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, Kaare, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman. 2003. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George, and Dominic Nardi. 2016. A Long Constitution Is a (Positively) Bad Constitution: Evidence from OECD Countries. British Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, Stefan. 2009. Explaining Constitutional Garrulity. International Review of Law and Economics 29 (4): 290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Matthew. 2017a. The Grammar of Politics: A Brief History of Legislative Language in Britain. Political Quarterly 88 (2): 248–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Matthew. 2017b. Legislative Language and Judicial Politics: The Effects of Changing Parliamentary Language on UK Immigration Disputes. British Journal of Politics and IR 19 (3): 592–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Matthew. 2018. How Language Works in Politics: The Impact of Indeterminate Legislation on Policy. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Williams .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Williams, M. (2022). The “New Constitutionalism” in 187 Countries. In: Judges and the Language of Law. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91495-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics