Abstract
Constitutions are both a cause of, and solution to, indeterminacies in public discourse. They are central to our understanding of state power, civic freedom, and, hence, policy influence for judges. This chapter finds evidence of a “new constitutionalism” that has been theorised (Stone Sweet, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; Gill and Cutler, New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014). We will be searching through the contents and language in all available constitutions to uncover what, in fact, is “new”, and what might be considered to have been “older” approaches to constituting a polity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Of course, non-binary classifications of executive type also exist. See, in particular, Siaroff (2003).
- 2.
A notable exception being Lijphart (2012).
- 3.
See theoretical work on post-structuralism and discourse analysis in, for example, Lyotard et al. (2006).
- 4.
Data for these comparisons was obtained from the Comparative Constitutions Project and Constitute Project from https://comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/ccp-rankings/, accessed from September 2018 to September 2021. See also Elkins et al. (2014).
- 5.
Data from the World Bank.
References
Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon.
Chapman, Kelly. 2015. Complexity and Creative Capacity: Rethinking Knowledge Transfer, Adaptive Management and Wicked Environmental Problems. London: Routledge.
Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, James Melton, Robert Shaffer, Juan F. Sequeda, and Daniel P. Miranker. 2014. Constitute: The World’s Constitutions to Read, Search, and Compare. Journal of Web Semantics 27: 10–18.
Elster, Jon. 1995. Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process. Duke Law Journal 45 (2): 364–396.
Ferejohn, John, Frances Rosenbluth, and Charles Shipan. 2007. Comparative Judicial Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan Stokes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gill, Stephen, and A. Claire Cutler. 2014. New Constitutionalism and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graber, Mark A. 2006. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 2009. The Federalist Papers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Horowitz, Donald L. 2002. Constitutional Design: Proposals versus Processes. In The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, ed. Andrew Reynolds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. London: University of Oklahoma Press.
Kammen, Michael G. 1986. A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture. New York: Knopf.
Lerner, Hanna. 2010. Constitution-Writing in Deeply Divided Societies: The Incrementalist Approach. Nations and Nationalism 16 (1): 68–88.
Lester, Richard, and Michael Piore. 2004. Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die: What History Tells Us About Our Future. London: Viking.
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Linz, Juan. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51–69.
Lyotard, Jean-François, Keith Crome, and James Williams. 2006. The Lyotard Reader and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
McGarry, John, and Brendan O’Leary. 2007. Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: Liberal Consociation as Political Prescription. International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (4): 670–698.
Melton, James, Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg, and Kalev Leetaru. 2013. On the Interpretability of Law: Lessons from the Decoding of National Constitutions. British Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 399–423.
Prempeh, H. Kwasi. 2007. Africa’s ‘Constitutionalism Revival’: False Start or New Dawn? Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (3): 469–506.
Renwick, Alan. 2010. The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riker, William H. 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown.
Rockmore, Daniel, Chen Fang, Nicholas Foti, Tom Ginsberg, and David Krakauer. 2017. The Cultural Evolution of National Constitutions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69 (3): 483–494.
Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Schmidt, Vivien. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.
Siaroff, Alan. 2003. Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political Research 42: 287–312.
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. Toward a New Comparative Politics of Federalism, (Multi)Nationalism, and Democracy: Beyond Rikerian Federalism. In Arguing Comparative Politics, ed. Stepan Alfred. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, David G. 2004. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, Alec. 1992. Where Judicial Politics Are Legislative Politics: The French Constitutional Council. West European Politics 15 (3): 29–49.
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strøm, Kaare, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman. 2003. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsebelis, George, and Dominic Nardi. 2016. A Long Constitution Is a (Positively) Bad Constitution: Evidence from OECD Countries. British Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 457–478.
Voigt, Stefan. 2009. Explaining Constitutional Garrulity. International Review of Law and Economics 29 (4): 290–303.
Williams, Matthew. 2017a. The Grammar of Politics: A Brief History of Legislative Language in Britain. Political Quarterly 88 (2): 248–257.
Williams, Matthew. 2017b. Legislative Language and Judicial Politics: The Effects of Changing Parliamentary Language on UK Immigration Disputes. British Journal of Politics and IR 19 (3): 592–608.
Williams, Matthew. 2018. How Language Works in Politics: The Impact of Indeterminate Legislation on Policy. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, M. (2022). The “New Constitutionalism” in 187 Countries. In: Judges and the Language of Law. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91495-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91495-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91494-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91495-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)