Skip to main content

Cross-Silo Process Mining with Federated Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 13121))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process analytics techniques such as process discovery play an important role in mining event data and providing organizations with insights about the behaviour of their deployed processes. In many practical settings, process log data is often geographically dispersed, may contain information that may be deemed sensitive and may be subject to compliance obligations that prevent this data from being transmitted to sites distinct to the site where the data was generated. Traditional process mining techniques operate by assuming that all relevant available process data is available in a single repository. However, anonymising, giving control access and safely transferring sensitive data across organization/site boundaries while preserving priacy guarantees is non-trivial. In this paper, we lay out the first steps for a federated future for process analytics where organizations routinely collaborate to learn and mine geographically dispersed process-related data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acs, G., Castelluccia, C.: Dream: Differentially private smart metering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.2531 (2012)

  2. Augusto, A., et al.: Automated discovery of process models from event logs: review and benchmark. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 31(4), 686–705 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Balle, B., Wang, Y.X.: Improving the gaussian mechanism for differential privacy: analytical calibration and optimal denoising. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 394–403. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonawitz, K., et al.: Towards federated learning at scale: System design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01046 (2019)

  5. Bonawitz, K., et al.: Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.04482 (2016)

  6. Bonawitz, K., et al.: Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In: proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1175–1191 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clifton, C., Kantarcioglu, M., Vaidya, J., Lin, X., Zhu, M.Y.: Tools for privacy preserving distributed data mining. ACM Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter 4(2), 28–34 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunkl, R., Fröschl, K.A., Grossmann, W., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Assessing medical treatment compliance based on formal process modeling. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) USAB 2011. LNCS, vol. 7058, pp. 533–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dwork, C., Kenthapadi, K., McSherry, F., Mironov, I., Naor, M.: Our data, ourselves: privacy via distributed noise generation. In: Vaudenay, S. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4004, pp. 486–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11761679_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., Smith, A.: Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In: Halevi, S., Rabin, T. (eds.) TCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3876, pp. 265–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11681878_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dwork, C., Roth, A., et al.: The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 9(3–4), 211–407 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, D., Kolesnikov, V., Rosulek, M.: A pragmatic introduction to secure multi-party computation. Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security, vol. 2, no. 2–3 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldreich, O., Micali, S., Wigderson, A.: How to play any mental game, or a completeness theorem for protocols with honest majority. In: Providing Sound Foundations for Cryptography: On the Work of Shafi Goldwasser and Silvio Micali, pp. 307–328 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen, P.B., Jensen, L.J., Brunak, S.: Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13(6), 395–405 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kairouz, P., Liu, Z., Steinke, T.: The distributed discrete gaussian mechanism for federated learning with secure aggregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.06387 (2021)

  16. Kairouz, P., et al.: Advances and open problems in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977 (2019)

  17. Konečnỳ, J., McMahan, H.B., Ramage, D., Richtárik, P.: Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527 (2016)

  18. Lang, M., Bürkle, T., Laumann, S., Prokosch, H.U.: Process mining for clinical workflows: challenges and current limitations. In: MIE, vol. 136, pp. 229–234 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lenz, R., Reichert, M.: It support for healthcare processes-premises, challenges, perspectives. Data Knowl. Eng. 61(1), 39–58 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McSherry, F., Talwar, K.: Mechanism design via differential privacy. In: 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’07), pp. 94–103. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ramage, D.: Federated analytics: Collaborative data science without data collection (2020). https://ai.googleblog.com/2020/05/federated-analytics-collaborative-data.html

  22. So, J., Güler, B., Avestimehr, A.S.: Turbo-aggregate: breaking the quadratic aggregation barrier in secure federated learning. IEEE J. Selected Areas Inform. Theor. 2(1), 479–489 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weijters, A., van Der Aalst, W.M., De Medeiros, A.A.: Process mining with the heuristics miner-algorithm. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Technical report, WP, vol. 166, pp. 1–34 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weijters, A., Ribeiro, J.T.S.: Flexible heuristics miner (fhm). In: 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM), pp. 310–317. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., Tong, Y.: Federated machine learning: concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10(2), 1–19 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu, W., Kairouz, P., McMahan, B., Sun, H., Li, W.: Federated heavy hitters discovery with differential privacy. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 3837–3847. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asjad Khan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khan, A., Ghose, A., Dam, H. (2021). Cross-Silo Process Mining with Federated Learning. In: Hacid, H., Kao, O., Mecella, M., Moha, N., Paik, Hy. (eds) Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13121. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91431-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91431-8_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91430-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91431-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics