Abstract
General Land Use Cover (LUC) datasets provide a holistic picture of all the land uses and covers on Earth, without focusing specifically on any individual land use category. As opposed to the LUC maps which are only available for one date or year, reviewed in Chap. “Global General Land Use Cover Datasets with a Single Date”, the maps with time series allow users to study LUC change over time. Time series of general LUC datasets at a global scale is useful for understanding global patterns of LUC change and their relation with global processes such as climate change or the loss of biodiversity. MCD12Q1, also known as MODIS Land Cover, was the first time series of LUC maps to be produced on a global scale. When it was first launched in 2002, there were already many organizations and researchers working on accurate, detailed global LUC maps, although these were all one-off editions for single years. The MCD12Q1 dataset continues to be updated today, providing a series of maps for the period 2001–2018. Since the launch of MCD12Q1, many other historical series of LUC maps have been produced, especially in the last decade. This has resulted in the LUC map series covering a longer time period at higher spatial resolution. Recent efforts have focused on producing consistent time series of maps that can track LUC changes over time with low levels of uncertainty. GLCNMO (500 m), GlobCover (300 m) and GLC250 (250 m) provide time series of LUC maps at similar spatial resolutions to MCD12Q1 (500 m), although for fewer reference years. GLCNMO provides information for the years 2003, 2008 and 2013, GlobCover for 2005 and 2009 and GLC250 for 2001 and 2010. GLASS-GLC is the dataset with the coarsest spatial resolution of all those reviewed in this chapter (5 km), even though it was released very recently, in 2020. Map producers have focused on this dataset’s long timespan (1982–2015) rather than on its spatial detail. LC-CCI and CGLS-LC100 are the recently launched datasets providing a consistent series of LUC maps, which show LUC changes over time with lower levels of uncertainty. LC-CCI provides LUC information for one of the longest timespans reviewed here (1992–2018) at a spatial resolution of 300 m. CGLS-LC100 provides LUC information for a shorter period (2015–2019) but at a higher spatial resolution (100 m). In both cases, updates are scheduled. The datasets with the highest levels of spatial detail are FROM-GLC and GLC30. These were produced using highly detailed Landsat imagery, delivering time series of maps at 30 m. The FROM-GLC project even has a test LUC map at a spatial resolution of 10 m from Sentinel-2 imagery for the year 2017, making it the global dataset with the greatest spatial detail of all those reviewed in this book. Both FROM-GLC and GLC30 provide data for three different dates: the former for 2010, 2015 and 2017 and the latter for 2000, 2010 and 2020.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 GLASS-GLC—Global Land Surface Satellite-Global Land Cover
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
1982–2015 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
5 km | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
8 classes: 0 (a), 1 (ag), 4 (v), 0 (m), 1 (na)Footnote 1 | ||
Compatible legends | ||
FROM-GLC | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Not planned | ||
Change detection | ||
Possible, although sources of uncertainty may arise | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >82% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open Access | .tiff | |
Technical documentation | ||
Liu et al. (2020) | ||
Other references of interest | ||
– |
Project
GLASS-GLC is the result of the research activity on LUC mapping carried out by a group of Chinese researchers. It is part of the efforts led by the Tsinghua University to map global LUC information, which also includes the FROM-GLC project, reviewed later in this chapter.
The project has delivered a series of global LUC maps at coarse resolution (5 km). This spatial resolution may limit the applicability of the dataset as, for example, it does not include information on impervious areas.
Production method
GLASS-GLC was obtained after making a supervised classification of AVHRR satellite imagery with the Google Earth Engine cloud platform. Random forest was the selected classifier. Auxiliary data, such as a Vegetation Continuous Field layer or a Digital Elevation Model, were also used in the classification.
To ensure the consistency of the maps over time, the authors applied the “LandTrendr” method and a linear regression-based algorithm. These helped to detect the LUC changes in the imagery archive used to obtain the LUC maps.
Product description
GLASS-GLC can be downloaded as a single compressed file. This file includes all the LUC maps for each year in the map series (1982–2015), as well as auxiliary data to help users understand the product.
Downloads
GLASS-GLC | |
---|---|
– A raster file with the LUC information for each available year (.tiff) – Word document with a technical description of the product |
Legend and codification
Code | Label | Code | Label |
---|---|---|---|
10 | Cropland | 70 | Tundra |
20 | Forest | 90 | Barren land |
30 | Grass | 100 | Snow/ice |
40 | Shrubland | 0 | No data |
2 LC-CCI—Land Cover-Climate Change Initiative
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
1992 – 2018 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
300 m (150 m for water bodies and 500 m for snow condition) MMU Changes: 1 km | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
37 classes: 1 (a), 2 (ag), 26 (v), 4 (m), 1 (na) | ||
Compatible legends | ||
PFT, FAO LCCS | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Updated planned (no date) | ||
Change detection | ||
Yes | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >70% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open Access after provision of name, institution and email | .tiff, .nc (NetCDF4) | |
Technical documentation | ||
ESA (2017) | ||
Other references of interest | ||
Bontemps et al. (2012), Hollmann et al. (2013), Hua et al. (2018), Mousivand and Arsanjani (2019), Vilar et al. (2019) |
Project
The Land Cover-Climate Change Initiative is a project run by the European Space Agency (ESA) that seeks to create LUC products that meet the requirements of the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) for Essential Climate Variables (ECV) and the Climate Modelling Community (CMC). It builds on the lessons learned during the GlobCover project. It also takes into account the opinion and the needs of users working in the climate and global land cover research communities, who were consulted and engaged with during the project.
The purpose of the project is to deliver a time series of land cover data that is stable, dynamic, transparent and flexible. This means: first, obtaining a historical series of land cover maps that show the changes over time, with no technical errors or instability: second, the production of a LUC dataset with a wide range of applications; and third, the provision of all relevant information regarding the quality of the dataset.
The project was launched in 2009 and has been developed in different phases. The initial idea was to create a LUC product covering three time periods (1998–2002, 2003–2007 and 2008–2012). Later, an improved yearly LUC product for the period 1992–2015 was launched, which replaced the previous one. Recently, this latter product has been updated and now includes new LUC maps for the period 2016–2018 which are consistent with the previous series.
Apart from LUC maps, other interesting products have also been created as part of the Climate Change Initiative: weekly image composites of the AVHRR (1992–1999, 1 km), MERIS (2003–2012, 300 m and 1 km) and PROBA-V (2014–2015, 1 km) sensors; a static map of open water bodies; and three global land surface seasonality products characterizing the dynamics of vegetation greenness, snow and burnt areas.
Production method
The LC-CCI LUC map series is based on a single base LUC map that is progressively updated and backdated. The base LUC layer was created by classifying a series of composite MERIS imagery for the period 2003–2012. A different classification was carried out for each year of this period, and the map finally obtained was a combination of all these classifications. This allowed them to differentiate between land cover states (i.e. those land features that remain stable over time) and land cover seasonality (i.e. natural, seasonal variability of land cover features that do not imply a change in the cover itself).
The classification method combined the GlobCover unsupervised classification chain with a machine learning algorithm. During the classification process, a series of spectrotemporal classes were identified. These were later labelled to LUC classes with the help of experts. The classification was regionalized to account for regional diversity and local heterogeneity of land cover characteristics.
Change detection for updating and backdating the base map was carried out with imagery from different sensors (AVHRR, SPOT, MERIS and PROVA), according to image availability. Changes were detected at a spatial resolution of 1 km, and since 2013 have been delineated at 300 m. Previously, delineation of changes at finer spatial resolutions had been impossible due to the lack of available images.
As a general rule, the only changes studied were those between six wide categories, which are not semantically close to each other: agriculture, forest, grassland, wetland, settlement and others. These changes had to persist for at least two years to be considered. The purpose of these rules was to try to ensure the stability over time of the LUC map series, avoiding technical changes and noise.
Product description
The LC-CCI dataset is distributed in different ways. This gives users the flexibility to download the product that best suits their needs. A single LUC map in either GeoTIFF or NetCDF4 may be downloaded for each year of the period 1992–2015. For the most recent years (2016–2018), these are only available in NetCDF4 format. Additionally, the whole time series of maps for the period 1992–2015 can be downloaded as a single raster with multiple bands, in either of the two formats available.
When downloading the LUC maps, users only gain access to the rasters with LUC information. However, other supplementary information is available on the project’s website. This includes a CSV file with the legend description; layer style files for displaying the rasters in common GIS software (ArcGIS, ENVI and QGIS); GeoTIFF files with information about the quality and uncertainty of the LUC maps time series (Quality flags); and a data package for users working with the Sen2Cor classification software.
Downloads
LC Map 2015 | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map |
LC maps full 1992–2015 series | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC maps series |
Legend and codification
Code | Label |
---|---|
0 | No data |
10 | Cropland, rainfed |
11 | Herbaceous cover |
12 | Tree or shrub cover |
20 | Cropland, irrigated or post-flooding |
30 | Mosaic cropland (>50%)/natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<50%) |
40 | Mosaic natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (>50%)/cropland (<50%) |
50 | Tree cover, broadleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%) |
60 | Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%) |
61 | Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed (>40%) |
62 | Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, open (15–40%) |
70 | Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%) |
71 | Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed (>40%) |
72 | Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, open (15–40%) |
80 | Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%) |
81 | Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed (>40% |
82 | Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, open (15–40%) |
90 | Tree cover, mixed leaf type (broadleaved and needleleaved) |
100 | Mosaic tree and shrub (>50%)/herbaceous cover (<50%) |
110 | Mosaic herbaceous cover (>50%)/tree and shrub (<50%) |
120 | Shrubland |
121 | Evergreen shrubland |
122 | Deciduous shrubland |
130 | Grassland |
140 | Lichens and mosses |
150 | Sparse vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<15%) |
152 | Sparse shrub (<15%) |
153 | Sparse herbaceous cover (<15%) |
160 | Tree cover, flooded, fresh or brackish water |
170 | Tree cover, flooded, saline water |
180 | Shrub or herbaceous cover, flooded, fresh/saline/brackish water |
190 | Urban areas |
200 | Bare areas |
201 | Consolidated bare areas |
202 | Unconsolidated bare areas |
210 | Water bodies |
220 | Permanent snow and ice |
Practical considerations
The project is aimed at the climate change research community and therefore provides the LUC data in the NetCDF4 raster file format commonly used by this community. However, .nc files are much heavier than .tiff files.
LUC maps for single years are easily displayed in QGIS. However, raster files storing the whole series of LUC maps for the period 1992–2015 are very heavy and are difficult to display in QGIS without a computer with good processing power.
3 GLC30—GlobeLand30
| Product |
LULC general | |
Dates | |
2000, 2010, 2020 | |
Formats | |
Raster | |
Pixel size | |
30 m Variable UMC depending on the category (3 × 3 to 10 × 10 pixels) | |
Thematic resolution | |
10 classes: 1 (a), 1 (ag), 4 (v), 0 (m), 0 (na) | |
Compatible legends | |
GLC30 | |
Extent | |
Global | |
Updating | |
Not planned | |
Change detection | |
Yes | |
Overall accuracy | |
Expected to be >78% | |
Website of reference | Website Language English |
Download site | |
Availability | Format(s) |
Open access under registration | .tiff |
Technical documentation | |
Chen et al. (2010, 2011a, b, 2012, 2014, 2016), Tang et al. (2014), Xie et al. (2015), Zhu et al. (2010) | |
Other references of interest | |
Cao et al. (2014), Chen et al. (2013, 2017), Han et al. (2015), Jun et al. (2014), Manakos et al. (2018), Shi et al. (2016a, b), Wu et al. (2016), Yang et al. (2017) |
Project
GlobeLand30 (GLC30) is a project funded and promoted by the Chinese government and the National Science Foundation of China. It aims to coherently map the land uses and covers on the world’s surface at a detailed scale, using images from the Landsat satellite imagery archive.
The project initially focused on analysing the best methods and procedures to carry out such an ambitious task. It then produced a global LUC map at 30 m for the reference years 2000 and 2010. An update of the dataset for the year 2020 was recently released, in which Antarctica was mapped for the first time.
Production method
GLC30 was obtained after classifying Landsat imagery using a pixel-object-knowledge-based (POK-based) classification approach. Other sources of complementary imagery were also used for the reference years 2010 (HJ-1—China Environment and Disaster Reduction Satellite) and 2020 (GF-1—China High Resolution Satellite).
The classification was carried out independently for each of the mapped categories. Water bodies were mapped first, followed by wetlands, snow and ice, artificial surfaces, cultivated land, forest, scrubland, grassland, barren land and finally tundra. Once a LUC category had been classified, the pixels assigned to that category were masked for the following classifications.
Each category was classified according to a specific approach, adapted to the characteristics of the features being mapped. For most of the categories, the classification approach consisted of three main steps: a pixel-based classifier, image segmentation and knowledge-based verification. For this last step, different sources of auxiliary information were used via their integration in a web-based data platform.
Product description
GLC30 is distributed in tiles. Users can separately download a LUC map for each tile and year of reference. The download includes the LUC map in raster format, a metadata file and a vector file with information about the satellite imagery used to obtain the map.
Downloads
GLC30 2020 | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map (.tiff) – Shapefile file with information about the imagery source used in the LUC classification (.shp) – Metadata file (.xls) |
Legend and codification
Code | Label | Code | Label |
---|---|---|---|
10 | Cultivated land | 60 | Water bodies |
20 | Forest | 70 | Tundra |
30 | Grassland | 80 | Artificial surfaces |
40 | Shrubland | 90 | Bareland |
50 | Wetland | 100 | Permanent snow and ice |
Practical considerations
The GLC30 LUC maps for 2000, 2010 and 2020 can also be accessed online through the project website,Footnote 2 which also includes plenty of information about the project and various other datasets. These include the 2020 imagery used to map the latest update of the dataset and different sources of reference data used as auxiliary information in the mapping process.
There are no technical documents describing the latest update of the map for the year 2020. Methodological changes in the production of the map could have been implemented which could lead to errors when comparing with previous editions.
The project website is not always maintained. It has been unattended for many months over recent years. If the website is not maintained, it is possible that the dataset may be not accessible in the future.
4 GLC250—Global Land Cover 250 m
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
2001, 2010 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
250 m | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
25 classes: 0 (a), 6 (ag), 7 (v), 1 (m), 0 (na) | ||
Compatible legends | ||
FAO-LCCS, IGBP | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Not expected | ||
Change detection | ||
Yes | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >75% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open Access | .tiff | |
Technical documentation | ||
Wang et al. (2015) | ||
Other references of interest | ||
– |
Project
This product forms part of the project led by Tsinghua University to effectively map land uses and covers across the world, which mainly focused on FROM-GLC and the production of thematic LUC databases. Several of these datasets were used in the production of GLC250. The classification legend for GLC250 was also taken from FROM-GLC.
Production method
GLC250 was obtained after the classification of MODIS imagery (MOD13Q1) with a random forest classifier fed with auxiliary data: slope, latitude, MODIS vegetation indexes. For each year of reference (2001, 2010), a classification was carried out for three different dates: the year of reference, the year before and the year after. For the year 2001, for example, images from 2000, 2001 and 2002 were classified.
The three probability maps obtained after the classification carried out for each year of reference were processed through a spatial–temporal consistency model (MAP-MRF) to improve the LUC classification. The final LUC map was improved in a post-classification phase through a rule-based label adjustment method using auxiliary data from MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields (MOD44B), slope and Enhanced Vegetation Index series.
Product description
A map for each year of reference can be downloaded in a single compressed file. Each file contains all the raster files that make up the LUC map for each year of reference. To this end, the global map is split into multiple tiles following the MODIS tile grid.Footnote 3
Downloads
GLC250—2010 | |
---|---|
– Raster files with a LUC map for each tile making up the MODIS tile grid (296 files) |
Legend and codification
The GLC250 classification scheme is the same as that developed for FROM-GLC. It is a two-level classification scheme, which allows the LUC map to be displayed at two different levels of detail. Only the most detailed scheme (Level 2) is displayed here. Interested users can consult the correspondence between Level 2 and Level 1 classes on the project’s website.Footnote 4
Code | Label | Code | Label |
---|---|---|---|
11 | Rice fields | 42 | Other shrublands |
12 | Greenhouse farming | 61 | Lake |
13 | Other croplands | 62 | Reservoir/pond |
14 | Seasonal croplands | 63 | River |
15 | Pastures | 64 | Ocean |
21 | Broadleaf forests | 91 | Dry salt flats |
22 | Needleleaf forests | 92 | Sandy areas |
23 | Mixed forests | 93 | Exposed bare rock |
24 | Orchards | 94 | Dry lake/river bottoms |
31 | Marshland | 95 | Tidal area |
32 | Herbaceous tundra | 101 | Snow |
33 | Other grasslands | 102 | Ice |
41 | Shrub and brush tundra |
5 MCD12Q1—MODIS/Terra + Aqua Land Cover Type
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
2001 – 2020 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
500 m, 1 km, 0.05º | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
18 classes (IGBP legend): 1 (a), 1 (ag), 10 (v), 2 (m), 1 (na) | ||
Compatible legends | ||
IGBP, UMD, LAI, BGC, PFT, FAO-LCCS | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Expected | ||
Change detection | ||
Not recommended | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >71% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open access under registration | .hdf | |
Technical documentation | ||
Friedl et al. (2002, 2010), Friedl and Sulla-Menashe (2019), Sulla-Menashe et al (2019) | ||
Other references of interest | ||
Fritz and See (2005), Giri et al. (2005), Hao and Gen-Suo (2014), Tchuenté et al. (2011) |
Project
MCD12Q1, also known as MODIS Land Cover type, dates back to 2002, after the launch into space of the TERRA satellite carrying the MODIS sensor. The MODIS sensor provided a new source of imagery for global LUC mapping. This led to the appearance of the MODIS Land Cover project, which aimed to produce a yearly series of LUC maps that could satisfy the demands of different communities interested in climate and environmental monitoring at global or very coarse scales. At the time the dataset was launched, only a few global LUC datasets were available, usually at coarser resolutions.
MODIS Land Cover was created by a team led by the University of Boston. Since 2002, six versions of the product have been developed. The latest is MODIS Land Cover Collection 6, which has included the most important changes in the production method of the dataset since its early developments.
A complementary product at coarser resolution has been developed as part of the same project: MCD12C1 (0.05 Deg).
Production method
MCD12Q1 was obtained by means of supervised classification (Random Forests) of MODIS imagery for the period 2001–2020. Once the classification had been obtained for each year, it was adjusted with the aid of auxiliary data: C5 MCD12Q1, C6 MODIS Land Water mask, C5 MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields (VCF), WorldClim dataset, a global urban layer and global crop type information compiled from census data.
As a result of the classification, class probability rasters were obtained for each LUC category. These inform about the probability of each pixel belonging to a specific LUC category. These probability layers provided a base on which to map LUC covers according to six different classification schemes: IGBP, UMD, LAI, BGC, PFT and FAO-LCCS. In order to ensure the consistency of the classification over time, a hidden Markov model (HMM) was applied to the adjusted classification to reduce spurious changes over time.
Product description
MCD12Q1 may be downloaded through different servers or tools: AppEEARS, Data Pool, NASA Earthdata Search, USGS EarthExplorer, OPeNDAP, DAAC2Disk Utility and LDOPE. Depending on the server or tool chosen, users can download the product as a single file for each year of reference or in tiles for specific areas of interest.
The download includes the raster file with LUC data in six different classification schemes and PDF documents with the technical specifications for the product.
Downloads
MCD12Q1 (500 m) | |
---|---|
– Raster file with multiple bands, including LUC information in five different classification schemes and data quality (.hdf) – PDFs with technical information about the product |
Legend and codification
MCD12Q1 is distributed for six different, widely used classification schemes. The only one displayed here is the IGBP scheme, which is one of the most commonly used. However, more information about the codes and class descriptions for the other classification legends is available in the user guide for this dataset (Sulla-Menashe et al. 2019).
MCD12Q1—IGBP (International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Code | Label | Code | Label |
1 | Evergreen needleleaf forests | 10 | Grasslands |
2 | Evergreen broadleaf forests | 11 | Permanent wetlands |
3 | Deciduous needleleaf forests | 12 | Croplands |
4 | Deciduous broadleaf forests | 13 | Urban and built-up lands |
5 | Mixed forests | 14 | Cropland/natural vegetation mosaics |
6 | Closed shrublands | 15 | Permanent snow and ice |
7 | Open shrublands | 16 | Barren |
8 | Woody savannas | 17 | Water bodies |
9 | Savannas | 18 | Unclassified |
Practical considerations
Users can consult the dataset online through the Web Map Service (WMS) available here.Footnote 5 The dataset is also available at a spatial resolution of 0.05 : MCD12C1 (0.05 Deg).Footnote 6
This dataset is not recommended for the study of LUC change, because of the high technical variability in LUC covers from one year to the next.
6 GLCNMO—Global Land Cover by National Mapping Organization
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
2003, 2008, 2013 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
1 km (2003) 500 m (2008, 2013) | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
20 classes: 1 (a), 3 (ag), 11 (v), 2 (m), 0 (na) | ||
Compatible legends | ||
FAO LCCS | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Not planned | ||
Change detection | ||
No | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >75% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open Access | .tiff | |
Technical documentation | ||
Other references of interest | ||
Hua et al. (2018) |
Project
GLCNMO is a project promoted by the International Steering Committee for Global Mapping (ISCGM) in collaboration with the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI), Chiba University and national mapping organizations from different participant countries. It is part of a wider effort to create global datasets on different subjects, including land cover and land use.
The project has delivered three global LUC maps. Each one was produced at a different time and various methodological changes were introduced between the production of each map. The most evident one was the change in spatial resolution after the 2003 map. Another important difference was the number of countries taking part in each edition of the map: 40 countries took part in the production of the 2003 map, 14 in the 2008 map and 22 in the map for 2013.
The ISCGM was wound up in 2016 and its data was transferred to the Geospatial Information Section in the United Nations. We, therefore, do not expect any updates on this project.
Production method
The three LUC maps were produced at the continental level using a mixture of different methods. The maps for each continent were prepared by separate groups, with national experts providing assistance for each case.
Most of the categories (14 in 2003 and 2008 and 11 in 2013) were obtained through supervised classification of MODIS imagery. The training samples for the classifier were selected with great care using photointerpretation from sources like Google Earth and other auxiliary data. Different classifiers were used for the different maps. Whereas the map for 2003 was produced using a maximum likelihood classifier, the ones for 2008 and 2013 were based on a decision tree classifier.
The remaining categories that were not classified using the method described above were individually mapped according to different procedures adapted to the specific needs of each category. These were urban, tree open, mangrove, wetland, snow/ice and water in 2003 and 2008. In addition to those, herbaceous areas, forests and agricultural areas were also mapped in this way in 2013. The strategies used to map these categories also varied in the different editions of the map, mainly involving specific classification methods of MODIS imagery, as well as the use of additional information, such as population density datasets, thematic MODIS products and other global LUC maps.
Product description
The GLCNMO LUC map is distributed individually for each available year. The map for each year is split into four tiles, which can be downloaded in different zipped files. No other additional information is provided, except for the scientific papers presenting each map.
Downloads
GLCNMO (version 3) | |
---|---|
– Raster LUC map covering North America, the north of South America and the west of Europe and Africa (1_1) – Raster LUC map covering Europe, the east of Africa and Asia (1_2) – Raster LUC map covering South America and the west of the Antarctic (2_1) – Raster LUC map covering Africa, the south of Asia and Oceania (2_2) |
Legend and codification
Code | Label | Code | Label |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Broadleaf evergreen forest | 11 | Cropland |
2 | Broadleaf deciduous forest | 12 | Paddy field |
3 | Needleleaf evergreen forest | 13 | Cropland/other vegetation mosaic |
4 | Needleleaf deciduous forest | 14 | Mangrove |
5 | Mixed forest | 15 | Wetland |
6 | Tree open | 16 | Bare area, consolidated (gravel, rock) |
7 | Shrub | 17 | Bare area, unconsolidated (sand) |
8 | Herbaceous | 18 | Urban |
9 | Herbaceous with sparse tree/shrub | 19 | Snow/ice |
10 | Sparse vegetation | 20 | Water bodies |
Practical considerations
As there are no auxiliary datasets or documentation, users who require more detailed information about the characteristics of the dataset should consult the scientific papers cited above (14.6 Technical Documentation).
7 GlobCover
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
2005, 2009 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
300 m | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
23 classes: 1 (a), 2 (ag), 14 (v), 4 (m), 1 (na) | ||
Compatible legends | ||
FAO LCCS | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Not planned | ||
Change detection | ||
Not recommended | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >78.0% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open Access | .tiff | |
Technical documentation | ||
Other references of interest | ||
Defourny et al. (2010) |
Project
GlobCover is a project run by the European Space Agency (ESA) in collaboration with the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, the European Environment Agency, the FAO, the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), the Global Observations of Forest Cover Land-use Dynamics (GOFC–GOLD) programme and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). It started in 2005 and produced two global LUC maps for the reference years 2005 and 2009. The Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL) also contributed to the 2009 edition of the map.
The aim of the project was to develop global LUC maps using images from the MERIS sensor onboard the ENVISAT satellite. At the time it was launched, the 2005 GlobCover map was the first global LUC map at a spatial resolution of 300 m.
Based on the results of GlobCover, the ESA launched a new project called GlobCorine in which two new LUC maps compatible with the Corine Land Cover classification legend were created for Europe from the same imagery. The LC-CCI project from the ESA (see Sect. 2) builds on the progress made and the lessons learnt during the GlobCover project.
Production method
GlobCover maps were obtained by classifying imagery captured by the MERIS sensor. Urban and wetland areas, which are not well represented, were classified using a supervised classifier. The remaining categories were classified in a series of spectro-temporal classes through an unsupervised classifier. Once classified, the spectro-temporal classes were labelled automatically according to the information provided by the reference datasets. For the 2005 map, the reference datasets were the GLC2000 global LUC map (see Sect. 3 in Chap. “Global General Land Use Cover Datasets with a Single Date” Global General Land Use Cover Datasets with a Single Date) and other high-quality regional LUC maps. For the 2009 map, the GlobCover 2005 map was used as a reference.
The area for classification was divided into different regions, to account for the ecological and reflectance diversity of the world. Once labelled after classification, the LUC map was finally edited to account for inaccuracies in the representation of certain features.
For the 2005 version, regional maps with a more detailed legend were also produced following the same classification procedure.
Product description
A zipped file is available for each GlobCover map. It contains the raster layer with the LUC information and all the auxiliary data that users may need to correctly interpret the dataset. This includes the classification legend, technical and data quality information, and files with the layer style of the map to automatically symbolize the raster in GIS software. A complementary raster detailing the source of the LUC information for each pixel (MERIS sensor classification (value = null) or a land cover database (value = 1)) is also provided. In a separate file, users can also download a raster for a coloured version of the LUC map.
Downloads
GlobCover | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map (“GLOBCOVER_L4_200901_200912_V2.3”) – Raster file with quality information (“GLOBCOVER_L4_200901_200912_V2.3_CLA_QL”) – Preview image of the product – Excel sheet with the map legend (“Globcover2009_Legend”) – Layer style files for ArcGIS (.lyr) and ENVI (.dsr) – PDFs with technical information about the product |
GlobCover coloured | |
---|---|
– Raster file with coloured version of LUC map |
Legend and codification
Code | Label |
---|---|
11 | Post-flooding or irrigated croplands (or aquatic) |
14 | Rainfed croplands |
20 | Mosaic cropland (50–70%)/vegetation (grassland/shrubland/forest) (20–50%) |
30 | Mosaic vegetation (grassland/shrubland/forest) (50–70%)/cropland (20–50%) |
40 | Closed to open (>15%) broadleaved evergreen or semi-deciduous forest (>5 m) |
50 | Closed (>40%) broadleaved deciduous forest (>5 m) |
60 | Open (15–40%) broadleaved deciduous forest/woodland (>5 m) |
70 | Closed (>40%) needleleaved evergreen forest (>5 m) |
90 | Open (15–40%) needleleaved deciduous or evergreen forest (>5 m) |
100 | Closed to open (>15%) mixed broadleaved and needleleaved forest (>5 m) |
110 | Mosaic forest or shrubland (50–70%)/grassland (20–50%) |
120 | Mosaic grassland (50–70%)/forest or shrubland (20–50%) |
130 | Closed to open (>15%) (broadleaved or needleleaved, evergreen or deciduous) shrubland (<5 m) |
140 | Closed to open (>15%) herbaceous vegetation (grassland, savannas or lichens/mosses) |
150 | Sparse (<15%) vegetation |
160 | Closed to open (>15%) broadleaved forest regularly flooded (semi-permanently or temporarily)—fresh or brackish water |
170 | Closed (>40%) broadleaved forest or shrubland permanently flooded—saline or brackish water |
180 | Closed to open (>15%) grassland or woody vegetation on regularly flooded or waterlogged soil—fresh, brackish or saline water |
190 | Artificial surfaces and associated areas (urban areas >50%) |
200 | Bare areas |
210 | Water bodies |
220 | Permanent snow and ice |
230 | No data (burnt areas, clouds…) |
Practical considerations
Eleven regional maps with more detailed classification schemes were developed as part of the GlobCover Project for 2005. These maps were produced using the same methodology as the global GlobCover, but provided more thematic detail. Unfortunately, they are currently unavailable for download.
8 FROM-GLC—Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring of Global Land Cover
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
2010, 2015, 2017 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
250 m, 500 m, 1 km, 5 km, 25 km, 50 km, 100 km (2010) 30 m (2010, 2015, 2017) 10 m (2017) | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
8 classes (2017): 1 (a), 1 (ag), 3 (v), 0 (m), 0 (na) | ||
Compatible legends | ||
– | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Not planned | ||
Change detection | ||
Not recommended | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >65% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open Access | .tiff | |
Technical documentation | ||
Chen et al. (2019), Gong et al. (2013), Yu et al. (2013, 2014) | ||
Other references of interest | ||
Project
FROM-GLC was a project funded by Chinese research and innovation programmes that was led by Tsinghua University. It brought together researchers from Chinese and other international institutions.
The goal of this project was to produce global LUC datasets at medium to high spatial resolution. When the project started, there were no global LUC maps available at a resolution of 30 m using images from the Landsat archive. Maps at that resolution are useful for different user communities working in cross-regional and cross-national areas at that level of detail. The aim of FROM-GLC was therefore to provide new sources of data for modelling communities that required detailed global datasets. Global LUC maps at detailed scales are also useful for countries for which no other detailed LUC datasets are available.
Three global LUC maps at three different time points (2010, 2015 and 2017) were created as part of this project. Three LUC maps are available for the year 2010. The original (FROM-GLC) was successively improved by changes in the production method, producing maps known as FROM-GLC-egg and FROM-GLC-agg, the latter being the final, most updated version. It is available at the original (30 m) and 7 other spatial resolutions: 250 m, 500 m, 1 km, 5 km, 25 km, 50 km and 100 km. Unlike the maps for 2010 and 2015, the one for 2017 was produced at two spatial resolutions: 10 and 30 m.
The research team involved in the production of FROM-GLC has also taken part in related projects to produce other national, regional and thematic LUC maps, most of them at fine spatial resolutions. These maps can be accessed through the project website and include national maps of China or Chile, thematic maps about water covers and other global LUC datasets.
Production method
Each FROM-GLC map was produced using a different method. The maps for 2010, 2015 and 2017 at 30 m were produced using a supervised classification of Landsat imagery.
Four different classifiers were compared in the production of FROM-GLC for 2010. The first improved version of FROM-GLC, known as FROM-GLC-egg, included an image-segmentation method in the classification process and used two different classifiers. In addition, impervious surfaces were individually mapped. For its part, FROM-GLC-agg was obtained by combining the previous two LUC maps (FROM-GLC, FROM-GLC-egg) using a decision tree algorithm. Impervious surfaces were remapped according to the information provided by the Nighttime Light Impervious Surface Area (NL-ISA) and the MODIS urban extent (MODIS-urban) datasets. Once the FROM-GLC-agg map had been obtained at 30 m, it was then aggregated at seven other spatial resolutions through majority aggregation and proportion aggregation approaches.
The map for 2017 at 10 m was obtained through a supervised classification of Sentinel-2 imagery with a random forest classifier in the Google Earth Engine.
Product description
The FROM-GLC LUC maps are not provided as a single global file. To facilitate downloading of the product, the world is split into different tiles. Users can download the tile corresponding to their area of interest according to its latitude and longitude values.
FROM-GLC products for the year 2010 can also be downloaded through an assisted kmz layer. When uploading it in Google Earth, users can visualize their area of interest and automatically download the map corresponding to that area.
Downloads
FROM-GLC-agg (2010) | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map |
FROM-GLC-agg hierarchy (2010) | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map at 30 m – Raster file with LUC map at 250 m obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 500 m obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 1 km obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 5 km obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 5 km obtained by proportion aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 10 km obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 10 km obtained by proportion aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 25 km obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 25 km obtained by proportion aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 50 km obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 50 km obtained by proportion aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 100 km obtained by majority aggregation – Raster file with LUC map at 100 km obtained by proportion aggregation |
FROM-GLC (2015) | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map |
FROM-GLC 30 m (2017) | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map |
FROM-GLC 10 m (2017) | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map |
Legend and codification
A specific two-level classification scheme legend was initially developed for the FROM-GLC project in 2010. This was updated with various changes for the FROM-GLC map for 2015. The map for 2017 has the simplest, least detailed classification legend (Level 1). In each case, we include the most detailed classification scheme available for each year. Users can consult the correspondence between level 2 and level 1 of the classification scheme for the years 2010 and 2015 at the project website.Footnote 7
FROM-GLC (2010) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Code | Label | Code | Label |
11 | Rice | 62 | Pond |
12 | Greenhouse | 63 | River |
13 | Other | 64 | Sea |
39 | Crop in urban | 69 | Water in urban |
21 | Broadleaf | 71 | Shrub |
22 | Needleleaf | 72 | Grass |
23 | Mixed | 81 | High albedo |
24 | Orchard | 82 | Low albedo |
29 | Forest in urban | 91 | Saline-Alkali |
31 | Managed | 92 | Sand |
32 | Nature | 93 | Gravel |
39 | Grass in urban | 94 | Bare Cropland |
40 | Shrubland | 95 | Dry river/lake bed |
49 | Shrub in urban | 96 | Other |
51 | Grass | 99 | Bareland in urban |
52 | Silt | 101 | Snow |
59 | Wetland in urban | 102 | Ice |
61 | Lake | 120 | Cloud |
FROM-GLC (2015) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Code | Label | Code | Label |
11 | Rice paddy | 41 | Shrubland, leaf-on |
12 | Greenhouse | 42 | Shrubland, leaf-off |
13 | Other | 51 | Marshland |
14 | Orchard | 52 | Mudflat |
15 | Bare farmland | 53 | Marshland, leaf-off |
21 | Broadleaf, leaf-on | 60 | Water |
22 | Broadleaf, leaf-off | 71 | Shrub and brush tundra |
23 | Needleleaf, leaf-on | 72 | Herbaceous tundra |
24 | Needleleaf, leaf-off | 80 | Impervious surface |
25 | Mixed leaf, leaf-on | 90 | Bareland |
26 | Mixed leaf, leaf-off | 92 | Bareland |
31 | Pasture | 101 | Snow |
32 | Natural grassland | 102 | Ice |
33 | Grassland, leaf-off | 120 | Cloud |
FROM-GLC (2017) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Code | Label | Code | Label |
1 | Cropland | 6 | Water |
2 | Forest | 8 | Impervious |
3 | Grass | 9 | Bareland |
4 | Shrubland | 10 | Snow/ice |
Practical considerations
The project website, where all the information is stored and available for download, is not user-friendly. It is not easy to find the information the user is looking for. Users may also struggle to download datasets for their area of interest according to latitude and longitude information. When available, we recommend using the kmz file with Google Earth for this purpose.
There is little additional information. For a complete description of the characteristics of the different maps, we recommend users to read the scientific papers cited in the introduction to this dataset above (14.8. Technical Documentation).
9 CGLS-LC100—Copernicus Global Land Service Dynamic Land Cover Map
| Product | |
LULC general | ||
Dates | ||
2015 – 2019 | ||
Formats | ||
Raster | ||
Pixel size | ||
100 m | ||
Thematic resolution | ||
24 classes: 1 (a), 1 (ag), 18 (v), 2 (m), 1 (na) | ||
Compatible legends | ||
FAO LCCS | ||
Extent | ||
Global | ||
Updating | ||
Yes, every year | ||
Change detection | ||
Possible, although sources of uncertainty may arise | ||
Overall accuracy | ||
Expected to be >80% | ||
Website of reference | Website Language English | |
Download site | ||
Availability | Format(s) | |
Open Access | .tiff | |
Technical documentation | ||
Buchhorn et al. (2020a, b, c), Tsendbazar et al. (2019, 2020) | ||
Other references of interest | ||
– |
Project
CGLS-LC100 is one of the deliverables produced as part of the Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS), which aims to provide a series of bio-geophysical products to monitor land surface at a global scale. In addition to this LUC package, the programme produces other relevant variables, such as the Leaf Area Index (LAI), the Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR), the Land Surface Temperature, soil moisture and other vegetation indices.
The first version of CGLS-LC100 was released in 2017, mapping LUC for Africa. Since then, several updates of the product have improved the production methodology and extended its temporal and geographical coverage. The last version of the product (Collection 3), released in 2021, covers the whole world for the period 2015–2019. It includes a method for detecting land cover change that addresses the main sources of technical uncertainty when studying change in a time series of LUC maps.
In addition to the LUC map described here, the product also includes a series of continuous field layers or “fraction maps” for the basic LUC classes mapped. Future updates of the product are expected on an annual basis, using the imagery provided by the Sentinel satellite missions.
Production method
The Copernicus Global Land Service Dynamic Land Cover map is produced through a multistep processing framework. First, PROBA-V satellite images are pre-processed and merged following a Sentinel-2 tiling grid to create a 3-year epoch mosaic for each reference year. Second, a series of metrics (spectral and textural metrics, descriptive statistics) are extracted from each epoch mosaic. Third, imagery for all the epochs is classified using a regression algorithm, which delivers a cover fraction layer for each basic LUC class and reference year, and a supervised classification algorithm, which delivers a LUC map for each reference year.
Various auxiliary data sources are used in the classification phase, i.e. seven different data masks and three extra datasets: biome clusters, water cover fractions and built-up cover fractions.
In order to ensure the temporal consistency of the LUC map series, it was decided to include a temporal post-processing phase in the production of the dataset. This consists of a BFAST break detection algorithm and a Hidden Markov Model. The former is used to detect changes in an independent time series of MODIS NIRv imagery, while the latter is used to rule out technical changes in the classified epoch images.
Product description
CGLS-LC100 is distributed in tiles, following the Sentinel-2 tiling grid (110 × 110 km). For each tile, users can download many different layers: the discrete classification containing the LUC map for the selected area; a layer with the classification probability; layers of cover fractions for each of the basic LUC classes mapped; a layer showing the level of confidence for the change measured between the different years in each pixel; and two extra layers: forest types and input data density.
The download of the LUC map only includes the raster file with the LUC information. Each reference year must be downloaded separately.
Downloads
Land Cover classification—discrete classification | |
---|---|
– Raster file with LUC map |
Cover fractions—bare and sparse vegetation | |
---|---|
– Raster file with the cover fraction for the land cover under consideration |
Land Cover changes—change confidence | |
---|---|
– Raster file indicating the reliability of the change in the discrete class |
Others—forest types | |
---|---|
– Raster file indicating for all pixels with a cover fraction >1% the type of forest represented in the pixel |
Legend and codification
Land Cover classification–discrete classification | |||
---|---|---|---|
Code | Label | Code | Label |
0 | No input data | 113 | Closed forest, deciduous needle leaf |
20 | Shrubs | 114 | Closed forest, deciduous broad leaf |
30 | Herbaceous vegetation | 115 | Closed forest, mixed |
40 | Cultivated and managed vegetation/agriculture (cropland) | 116 | Closed forest, unknown |
50 | Urban/built up | 121 | Open forest, evergreen needle leaf |
60 | Bare/sparse vegetation | 122 | Open forest, evergreen broad leaf |
70 | Snow and ice | 123 | Open forest, deciduous needle leaf |
80 | Permanent water bodies | 124 | Open forest, deciduous broad leaf |
90 | Herbaceous wetland | 125 | Open forest, mixed |
100 | Moss and lichen | 126 | Open forest, unknown |
111 | Closed forest, evergreen needle leaf | 200 | Open sea |
112 | Closed forest, evergreen, broad leaf | 113 | Closed forest, deciduous needle leaf |
Cover fractions—bare and sparse vegetation | |
---|---|
Code | Meaning |
0–100 | Percentage of the pixel (0–100%) covered by the land cover under consideration |
200 | Masked sea |
Land Cover changes—change confidence | |||
---|---|---|---|
Code | Change confidence | Code | Change confidence |
0 | No change | 2 | Medium confidence |
1 | Potential change | 3 | High confidence |
Others—forest types | |||
---|---|---|---|
Code | Forest type | Code | Forest type |
0 | Unknown | 3 | Deciduous, needle leaf forest (DNF) |
1 | Evergreen, needle leaf forest (ENF) | 4 | Deciduous, broad leaf forest (DBF) |
2 | Evergreen, broad leaf forest (EBF) | 5 | Mixed |
Practical considerations
Because of the large number of datasets available through this project, users are encouraged to make use of the different layers of LUC information available. This will give them a better understanding of the uncertainties and limitations of the product.
Users can download the product covering the whole globe, which is distributed through the files in the Zenodo repository.Footnote 8
Notes
- 1.
(a): artificial; (ag): agriculture; (v): vegetation; (m): mixed classes; (na): no data.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
References
Bontemps S, Herold M, Kooistra L et al (2012) Revisiting land cover observation to address the needs of the climate modeling community. Biogeosciences 9:2145–2157. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2145-2012
Cao X, Chen J, Chen L et al (2014) Preliminary analysis of spatiotemporal pattern of global land surface water. Sci China Earth Sci 57:2330–2339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4929-x
Chen J, Zhu X, Imura H, Chen X (2010) Consistency of accuracy assessment indices for soft classification: simulation analysis. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.10.003
Chen J, Chen X, Cui X, Chen J (2011a) Change vector analysis in posterior probability space: a new method for land cover change detection. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 8:317–321. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2010.2068537
Chen J, Zhu X, Vogelmann JE et al (2011b) A simple and effective method for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Remote Sens Environ 115:1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.010
Chen X, Chen J, Shi Y, Yamaguchi Y (2012) An automated approach for updating land cover maps based on integrated change detection and classification methods. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 71:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.05.006
Chen J, Wu H, Li S et al (2013) Temporal logic and operation relations based knowledge representation for land cover change web services. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 83:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.02.005
Chen J, Chen J, Liao A et al (2014) Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 103:7–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002
Chen F, Chen J, Wu H et al (2016) A landscape shape index-based sampling approach for land cover accuracy assessment. Sci China Earth Sci 59:2263–2274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5280-5
Chen J, Li S, Wu H, Chen X (2017) Towards a collaborative global land cover information service. Int J Digit Earth 10:356–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1267268
Friedl MA, McIver DK, Hodges JCF et al (2002) Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens Environ 83:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00078-0
Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B et al (2010) MODIS collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ 114:168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016
Fritz S, See L (2005) Comparison of land cover maps using fuzzy agreement. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19:787–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810500072020
Giri C, Zhu Z, Reed B (2005) A comparative analysis of the global land cover 2000 and MODIS land cover data sets. Remote Sens Environ 94:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.09.005
Gong P, Wang J, Yu L et al (2013) Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int J Remote Sens 34:2607–2654. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.748992
Han G, Chen J, He C et al (2015) A web-based system for supporting global land cover data production. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 103:66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.012
Hao G, Gen-Suo J (2014) Assessing MODIS land cover products over China with probability of interannual change. Atmos Ocean Sci Lett 7:564–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2014.11447225
Hollmann R, Merchant CJ, Saunders R et al (2013) The ESA climate change initiative: satellite data records for essential climate variables. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1541–1552. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00254.1
Ji L, Gong P, Geng X, Zhao Y (2015) Improving the accuracy of the water surface cover type in the 30 m FROM-GLC product. Remote Sens 7:13507–13527. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71013507
Jun C, Ban Y, Li S (2014) Open access to earth land-cover map. Nature 514:434–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/514434c
Kobayashi T, Tateishi R, Alsaaideh B et al (2017) Production of global land cover data—GLCNMO2013. J Geogr Geol 9:1. https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v9n3p1
Liu H, Gong P, Wang J et al (2020) Annual dynamics of global land cover and its long-term changes from 1982 to 2015. Earth Syst Sci Data 12:1217–1243. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1217-2020
Mousivand A, Arsanjani JJ (2019) Insights on the historical and emerging global land cover changes: the case of ESA-CCI-LC datasets. Appl Geogr 106:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.03.010
Shi X, Nie S, Ju W, Yu L (2016a) Climate effects of the GlobeLand30 land cover dataset on the Beijing climate center climate model simulations. Sci China Earth Sci 59:1754–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-5320-x
Sulla-Menashe D, Gray JM, Abercrombie SP, Friedl MA (2019) Hierarchical mapping of annual global land cover 2001 to present: the MODIS collection 6 land cover product. Remote Sens Environ 222:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.013
Tang P, Zhang H, Zhao Y et al (2014) Practice and thoughts of the automatic processing of multispectral images with 30 m spatial resolution on the global scale. J Remote Sens 18:231–253. https://doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20143287
Tateishi R, Uriyangqai B, Al-Bilbisi H et al (2011) Production of global land cover data—GLCNMO. Int J Digit Earth 4:22–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538941003777521
Tateishi R, Hoan NT, Kobayashi T et al (2014) Production of global land cover data—GLCNMO2008. J Geogr Geol 6:99–122. https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v6n3p99
Tchuenté ATK, Roujean JL, de Jong SM (2011) Comparison and relative quality assessment of the GLC2000, GLOBCOVER, MODIS and ECOCLIMAP land cover data sets at the African continental scale. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 13:207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.11.005
Vilar L, Garrido J, Echavarría P et al (2019) Comparative analysis of CORINE and climate change initiative land cover maps in Europe: implications for wildfire occurrence estimation at regional and local scales. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 78:102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.01.019
Wang J, Zhao Y, Li C et al (2015) Mapping global land cover in 2001 and 2010 with spatial-temporal consistency at 250 m resolution. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 103:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.007
Xie H, Tong X, Meng W et al (2015) A multilevel stratified spatial sampling approach for the quality assessment of remote-sensing-derived products. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8:4699–4713. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2437371
Yang Z, Dong J, Liu J et al (2017) Accuracy assessment and inter-comparison of eight medium resolution forest products on the Loess Plateau. China. ISPRS Int J Geo-Information 6:152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6050152
Yu L, Wang J, Gong P (2013) Improving 30 m global land-cover map FROM-GLC with time series MODIS and auxiliary data sets: a segmentation-based approach. Int J Remote Sens 34:5851–5867. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.798055
Yu L, Wang J, Li X et al (2014) A multi-resolution global land cover dataset through multisource data aggregation. Sci China Earth Sci 57:2317–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4919-z
Zhu X, Chen J, Gao F et al (2010) An enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model for complex heterogeneous regions. Remote Sens Environ 114:2610–2623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.05.032
Bicheron P, Defourny P, Brockmann C, et al (2008) GLOBCOVER. Products description and validation report. http://due.esrin.esa.int/files/GLOBCOVER_Products_Description_Validation_Report_I2.1.1.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2020
Bontemps S, Defourny P, Van Bogaert E, et al (2011) GLOBCOVER 2009 products description and validation report. http://due.esrin.esa.int/files/GLOBCOVER_Products_Description_Validation_Report_I2.1.1.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2020
Buchhorn et al., 2020aBuchhorn M, Lesiv M, Tsendbazar NE, et al (2020a) Copernicus global land cover layers-collection 2. Remote Sens 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061044
Buchhorn M, Smets B, Bertels L, et al (2020b) Copernicus global land service: land cover 100 m: version 3 globe 2015–2019: product user manual. https://land.copernicus.eu/global/sites/cgls.vito.be/files/products/CGLOPS1_PUM_LC100m-V3_I3.3.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2020b
Buchhorn M, Bertels L, Smets B, et al (2020c) Copernicus global land service: land cover 100 m: version 3 globe 2015–2019: algorithm theoretical basis document. https://land.copernicus.eu/global/sites/cgls.vito.be/files/products/CGLOPS1_ATBD_LC100V3_I3.3.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2020c
Chen B, Xu B, Zhu Z, et al (2019) Stable classification with limited sample: transferring a 30 m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10 m resolution global land cover in 2017. Sci Bull
Defourny P, Bontemps S, Obsomer V, et al (2010) Accuracy assessment of global land cover maps: lessons learnt from the GlobCover and GlobCorine experiences. In: SP-686 ESA living planet symposium Bergen, Norway, 2010-06-28/2010-07-02
ESA (2017) Land cover CCI. Product user guide. Version 2.0. http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download/ESACCI-LC-Ph2-PUGv2_2.0.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2020
Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D (2019) User guide to collection 6 MODIS land cover (MCD12Q1 and MCD12C1) product. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/101/MCD12_User_Guide_V6.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2020
Hua T, Zhao W, Liu Y, et al (2018) Spatial consistency assessments for global land-cover datasets: a comparison among GLC2000, CCI LC, MCD12, GLOBCOVER and GLCNMO. Remote Sens 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111846
Manakos I, Tomaszewska M, Gkinis I, et al (2018) Comparison of global and continental land cover products for selected study areas in South Central and Eastern European Region. Remote Sens 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121967
Shi X, Nie S, Ju W, Yu L (2016b) Application and impacts of the GlobeLand30 land cover dataset on the Beijing climate center climate model. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. pp 12–32
Tsendbazar NE, Herold M, Tarko A, et al (2019) Copernicus global land service: land cover 100 m: version 2: validation report. https://land.copernicus.eu/global/sites/cgls.vito.be/files/products/CGLOPS1_VR_LC100m-V2.0_I1.00.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2020
Tsendbazar NE, Tarko A, Linlin L, et al (2020) Copernicus global land service: land cover 100 m: version 3 globe 2015–2019: validation report. https://land.copernicus.eu/global/sites/cgls.vito.be/files/products/CGLOPS1_VR_LC100m-V3.0_I1.00.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2020
Wu H, Chen J, Xing H, et al (2016) Pragmatics driven land cover service composition utilizing behavior-intention model. In: ISPRS—international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. pp 1319–1325
Xu H, Wei Y, Liu C, et al (2019) A scheme for the long-term monitoring of impervious-relevant land disturbances using high frequency Landsat archives and the Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161891
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
García-Álvarez, D., Lara Hinojosa, J., Jurado Pérez, F.J., Quintero Villaraso, J. (2022). Global General Land Use Cover Datasets with a Time Series of Maps. In: García-Álvarez, D., Camacho Olmedo, M.T., Paegelow, M., Mas, J.F. (eds) Land Use Cover Datasets and Validation Tools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90998-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90998-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90997-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90998-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)