Skip to main content

Longitudinal Co-teaching Projects: Scoping Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Orchestration of Learning Environments in the Digital World

Abstract

The main orientations of education policy with a view to the next decade include, inter alia, promoting educational innovation and verifying it through further professional development of teaching staff and exploring the effectiveness of learning. One of the possibilities of achieving this goal is co-teaching and its forms, which are constantly evolving. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of approaches not only to the actual implementation of co-teaching but also to the whole process of preparation in order to evaluate the experience gained in a number of researches already carried out, in the form of an overview study. An inductive thematic analysis of published articles in 2005–2020, with a predominance of attention for the period 2019 and 2020, was used in 16 databases such as ERIC, Scopus®, Complementary Index, etc. Nineteen articles were finally included in the analysis of the issues examined. Inductive thematic analysis identified six themes: (1) “co-teaching effectiveness,” (2) “problems and obstacles,” (3) “methods of and with co-teaching,” (4) “teachers’ roles and relationships,” (5) “teachers’ cooperation,” and (6) “special educational needs” (SEN). The scoping review study covers the theoretical basis of co-teaching issues, the results of research surveys or experiments on the procedures, and advantages or barriers of various co-teaching models. The study serves as a basic framework supporting the creation and application of a virtual component as a new part of the educational method of co-teaching solved by the TAČR project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reference to the UKAZ system, which has access to all of the above databases: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/search/advanced?vid=7&sid=b259143b-4e01-42db-8c7c-22f94f9d499f%40pdc-v-sessmgr04

  2. 2.

    See http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Funding: This study was supported by Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TAČR), Project No. TL03000133.

References

  • Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, N., Heck, T. W., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching through co-teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2014). Student teachers’ team teaching: Models, effects, and conditions for implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beninghof, A. M. (2012). Co-teaching that works: Structures and strategies for maximizing student learning. Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilican, K., Akerson, V., & Nargund, V. (2020). Learning by teaching: A case study of co-teaching to enhance nature of science educators, successes, and challenges. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. L., Reedy, A. R., Baird, M. J., & Baird, D. M. (2018). Better together: Co-teaching in undergraduate applied psychology courses. Psychology Teaching Review, 24(2), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris Chan, Alan Lam, Louis Li, 2012. Case study: Affordances of using multi-HD technology for distanced co-teaching in Hong Kong secondary schools. In 2012 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, Information and Communication Technologies, Trivadrum, 2012, pp. 16–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conderman, G., Bresnahan, V., & Pedersen, T. (2009). Purposeful co-teaching: Real cases and effective strategies. SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, D., Flores, M., Ribas, T., & Ribosa, J. (2020). Student teachers’ perceptions and evidence of peer learning through co-teaching: Improving attitudes and willingness towards co-teaching. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckardt, P., & Giouroukakis, V. (2018). The impact of co-teaching on pedagogical approaches and student conceptual understanding in a graduate, adolescent literacy course. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 17(2), 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J., & Watson, A. (2013). Bring student teaching into the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(7), 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, M. (2014). Co-teach! Building and sustaining effective classroom partnerships in inclusive schools (2nd ed.). Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, M. (2015). Co-teaching versus apprentice teaching: An analysis of similarities and differences. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurkowski, S., & Müller, B. (2018). Co-teaching in inclusive classes: The development of multi-professional cooperation in teaching dyads. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A.-H., Woodruff, A. L., Klein, C., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Facilitating co-teaching for literacy in general education classrooms through technology: Focus on students with learning disabilities. Reading, 22(3), 269–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lõhmusa, E., Naritsa, H., & Ugur, K. (2019). Lecturer’s and assistant’s views on collaborative teaching at the university. Estonian Journal of Education, 7(2), 231–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, M., & Akerson, A. (2019). Facilitating collaboration through a co-teaching field experience. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 21(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murawski, W. W. (2017). Beyond co-teaching basics: A data-driven, no-fail model for continuous improvement. ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neifeald, E., & Nissim, Y. (2019). Co-teaching in the “Academia Class”: Evaluation of advantages and frequency of practices. International Education Studies, 12(5), 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. (2014). English co-teaching and teacher collaboration: A micro-interactional perspective. System, 44(1), 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puttonen, K. (2014). Information specialist and ICT lecturer co-teach an online course: A new way and what students think about it. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 6(1), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, C. (2020). Co-teaching: Collaborative and caring teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexroat-Frazier, N., & Chamberlin, S. (2019). Best practices in co-teaching mathematics with special needs students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(3), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, L. A., & Fingon, J. C. (2017). Faculty modeling co-teaching and collaboration practices in general education and special education courses in teacher preparation programmes. Athens Journal of Education, 4(4), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez Jafeth, E., Kelly, H., & Carroll, K. (2019). Exploring the co-teaching experience in a graduate-level, principal preparation course. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 14, 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strogilos, V., & King-Sears, M. (2019). Co-teaching is extra help and fun: Perspectives on co-teaching from middle school students and co-teachers. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(2), 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takala, M., & Wickman, K. (2019). Collaborative case-based virtual learning in higher education: Consultation case in special education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K. W., & Dow, M. J. (2017). Co-teaching to improve control variable experiment instruction in physical sciences education. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 36–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. (2012). Co-teaching as a school system strategy for continuous improvement. Preventing School Failure, 56, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. G., & VanBerschot, J. L. (2014). Co-teaching an online action research class/Co-enseignement et classe de recherche-action en ligne. Canadian Journal of Learning and Teaching, 40(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobak, M., & Schnelzer, W. (2015). Teamteaching: Kollegiale Kooperation für gelingendes Lehren und Lernen. School of Education, Universität Innsbruck.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuzana Svobodova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Veteska, J., Kursch, M., Svobodova, Z., Tureckiova, M., Paulovcakova, L. (2022). Longitudinal Co-teaching Projects: Scoping Review. In: Ifenthaler, D., Isaías, P., Sampson, D.G. (eds) Orchestration of Learning Environments in the Digital World. Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90944-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90944-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90943-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90944-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics