Abstract
Even though human-centered approaches such as Design Thinking have become a widespread strategy to gain competitive advantages, it remains unclear what it means for digital platform design. The very core of digital platforms lies in the systematic reuse of modules to reduce complexity and increase variety through configuration. Design Thinking, in turn, yields a variety of prototypes grounded in a deep understanding of the problem space. While the risk of the former lies in solution-fixation, the risk of the latter is that individual desirable solutions inhibit the transition toward actual implementation. Both perspectives are triangulated and the value of Design Thinking as a mindset, process, and toolset for Digital Platform Design is discussed. This contribution highlights the sweet spot where a wide range of problems (user needs) are addressed by a variety of platform configurations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity. MIT Press
Bask A, Lipponen M, Rajahonka M, Tinnilä M (2010) The concept of modularity: diffusion from manufacturing to service production. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 21(3):355–375
Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: multi-sided platforms as regulators. Platf Mark Innov 1:163–191
Brax SA, Bask A, Hsuan J, Voss C (2017) Service modularity and architecture – an overview and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manag 37(6):686–702
Brenner W, Uebernickel F, Abrell T (2016) Design Thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. In: Brenner W, Uebernickel F (eds) Design Thinking for innovation: research and practice. Springer, Cham, pp 3–21
Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business, New York
Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. Rand J Econ 34(2):309–328
Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker GG (2018) Introduction—platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inf Syst Res 29(2):381–400
Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D (2007) About face 3: the essentials of interaction design. John Wiley & Sons
Cusumano MA, Gawer A, Yoffie DB (2019) The business of platforms: strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Business, New York
De Weck OL, Roos D, Magee CL (2011) Engineering systems: meeting human needs in a complex technological world. MIT Press
Design Council (2015) What is the framework for innovation? Design council’s evolved double diamond. Design Council. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond. Accessed 7 Feb 2021
Dolata M, Schwabe G (2016) Design thinking in IS research projects. In: Brenner W, Uebernickel F (eds) Design thinking for innovation. Springer, Cham, pp 67–83
Evans PC, Gawer A (2016) The rise of the platform enterprise: a global survey. The Center for Global Enterprise. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/811201/
Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Res Policy 43(7):1239–1249
Germonprez M, Hovorka D, Collopy F (2007) A theory of tailorable technology design. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(6):315–367
Hanington B, Martin B (2012) Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Publishers, Massachusetts
Hehn J, Uebernickel F, Herterich M (2018a) Design thinking methods for service innovation—a Delphi study. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Yokohama
Hehn J, Uebernickel F, Stoeckli E, Brenner W (2018b) Designing human-centric information systems: towards an understanding of challenges in specifying requirements within design thinking projects. MKWI proceedings 2018
Hehn J, Mendez D, Uebernickel F, Brenner W, Broy M (2020) On integrating design thinking for human-centered requirements engineering. IEEE Softw 37(2):25–31
Hein A, Weking J, Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Böhm M, Krcmar H (2019) Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electron Mark 29(3):503–518
Hein A, Schreieck M, Riasanow T, Setzke DS, Wiesche M, Böhm M, Krcmar H (2020) Digital platform ecosystems. Electron Mark 30(1):87–98
IDEO (2015). Field guide to human-centered design. IDEO.org. https://www.designkit.org/resources/1. Accessed 6 Feb 2021
Jones M, Samalionis F (2008) From small ideas to radical service innovation. Des Manag Rev 19(1):20
Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75(3):424–440
Linsey JS, Markman AB, Wood KL (2012) Design by analogy: a study of the wordtree method for problem re-representation. J Mech Des 134(4):041009
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) (2019) Design thinking research: looking further: design thinking beyond solution-fixation. Understanding innovation. Springer, Cham
Moon SK, Shu J, Simpson TW, Kumara SRT (2010) A module-based service model for mass customization: service family design. IIE Trans 43(3):153–163
Porter ME (1996) What is strategy. Harv Bus Rev 74(6):61–78
Porter ME (2012) What is strategy: issues for the world bank. Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/2012-0802—World_Bank_Strategy_c2726162-7d36-400b-938c-a87119f5ccac.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2021
Rae J (2015) Design value index. Des Manag Rev 26(1):4–8
Rouse WB (2007) People and organizations: explorations of human-centered design. Wiley
Sheppard B, Sarrazin H, Kouyoumjian G, Dore F (2018) The business value of design. McKinsey Quarterly
Staehelin D, Dolata M, Schwabe G (2021) Managing tensions in research consortia with design thinking artifacts. In: Hehn J, Mendez D, Brenner W, Broy M (eds) Design thinking for software engineering - creating human-oriented software intensive products and services. Springer
Stoeckli E, Dremel C, Uebernickel F (2018) Exploring characteristics and transformational capabilities of InsurTech innovations to understand insurance value creation in a digital world. Electron Mark 28(3):287–305
Sun W, Zhang X, Guo CJ, Sun P, Su H (2008) Software as a service: configuration and customization perspectives. In: 2008 IEEE Congress on Services Part II (services-2 2008)
Tuckman BW (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull 63(6):384–399
Uebernickel F, Brenner W, Naef T, Pukall B, Schindlholzer B (2015) Design thinking: Das Handbuch. Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch
Viana DD, Tommelein ID, Formoso CT (2017) Using modularity to reduce complexity of industrialized building systems for mass customization. Energies 10(10):1622
Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf Syst Res 21(4):724–735
Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ Sci 23(5):1398–1408
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stoeckli, E. (2022). Digital Platform Design at the Edge of Complexity: The Value of Design Thinking to Balance Between Configuration and Customization. In: Hehn, J., Mendez, D., Brenner, W., Broy, M. (eds) Design Thinking for Software Engineering. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90594-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90594-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90593-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90594-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)