Abstract
Sugarcane is one of India's most important cash crops and one of the major crops of Uttarakhand state. Accurate crop yield forecasting is essential for making appropriate government policies. Statistical regression method using meteorological parameters is one of the most widely used crop yield forecasting methods. With the help of statistical regression, it is possible to forecast the sugarcane yield a few months before the harvest. But there is no direct cause–effect relationship between meteorological parameters and crop yield, so uses of other independent parameters can increase the crop yield accuracy. Evapotranspiration is one of the most crucial independent parameters, which can be easily estimated using remote sensing. The benefit of remote sensing over other fields and empirical methods for evapotranspiration is the easy availability of data over a large area as data availability becomes critical in other methods. Crop water efficiency can be easily found by crop water productivity. The developed Sugarcane yield actual evapotranspiration (AET) model using regression techniques for the F2 stage and both with and without AET model for F3 stage except 2019–20 in Haridwar district and the developed sugarcane yield model with and without AET using regression techniques for the F2 and F3 stage in Dehradun district showed a good relationship between predicted and observed values of yield which is below 5% deviation. From the study of crop water productivity, we can easily mark the areas with low water productivity and used different planning to increase the water efficiency to fulfill the need of people in reducing water availability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bhatla R, Dani B, Tripathi A (2018) Impact of climate on sugarcane yield over Gorakhpur District, UP using statistical model. Vayu Mandal 44(1):11–22
Brar SK, Mahal SS, Brar AS, Vashist KK, Sharma N, Buttar GS (2012) Transplanting time and seedling age affect water productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India. Agric Water Manag 115:217–222
Brauman KA, Siebert S, Foley JA (2013) Improvements in crop water productivity increase water sustainability and food security—a global analysis. Environ Res Lett 8(2):024030
Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Report, 2017–2018: https://agricoop.nic.in/
Doraiswamy PC, Hatfield JL, Jackson TJ, Akhmedov B, Prueger J, Stern A (2004) Crop condition and yield simulations using Landsat and MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 92:548–559
FAO (2018) Food and Agricultural Organization Statistical Yearbook 2. http://www.fao.org
Gunawardhana M, Silvester E, Jones OA, Grover S (2021) Evapotranspiration and biogeochemical regulation in a mountain peatland: insights from eddy covariance and ionic balance measurements. J Hydrol Reg Stud 36:100851
Jayakumar M, Rajavel M, Surendran U (2016) Climate-based statistical regression models for crop yield forecasting of coffee in humid tropical Kerala, India. Int J Biometeorol 60(12):1943–1952
Johnson DM (2014) An assessment of pre- and within-season remotely sensed variables for forecasting corn and soybean yields in the United States. Remote Sens Environ 141:116–128
Kouadio L, Duveiller G, Djaby B, El Jarroudi M, Defourny P, Tychon B (2012) Estimating regional wheat yield from the shape of decreasing curves of green area index temporal profiles retrieved from MODIS data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 18:111–118
Liu YJ, Chen J, Pan T (2019) Analysis of changes in reference evapotranspiration, pan evaporation, and actual evapotranspiration and their influencing factors in the North China Plain during 1998–2005. Earth Space Sci 6(8):1366–1377
Mkhabela MS, Bullock P, Raj S, Wang S, Yang Y (2011) Crop yield forecasting on the Canadian Prairies using MODIS NDVI data. Agric for Meteorol 151:385–393
Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2008) Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22(1)
Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. In: Symposia of the society for experimental biology, vol 19. Cambridge University Press (CUP), Cambridge, pp 205–234
Morel J, Todoroff P, Bégué A, Bury A, Martiné JF, Petit M (2014) Toward a satellite-based system of sugarcane yield estimation and forecasting in smallholder farming conditions: a case study on Reunion Island. Remote Sens 6(7):6620–6635
Mosleh M, Hassan Q (2014) Development of a remote sensing-based “Boro” rice mapping system. Remote Sens 6:1938–1953
Mu Q, Zhao M, Running SW (2011) Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sens Environ 115(8):1781–1800
Mulianga B, Bégué A, Simoes M, Todoroff P (2013) Forecasting regional sugarcane yield based on time integral and spatial aggregation of MODIS NDVI. Remote Sens 5(5):2184–2199
Naseri H, Parashkoohi MG, Ranjbar I, Zamani DM (2021) Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems. Energy 217:119252
Natarajan R, Subramanian J, Papageorgiou EI (2016) Hybrid learning of fuzzy cognitive maps for sugarcane yield classification. Comput Electron Agric 127:147–157
Pareek N, Raverkar KP, Bhatt MK, Kaushik S, Chandra S, Singh G, Joshi HC (2019) Soil nutrient status of Bhabhar and hill areas of Uttarakhand. ENVIS Bull Himalayan Ecol 27
Potgieter A, Apan A, Hammer G, Dunn P (2011) Estimating winter crop area across seasons andregions using time-sequential MODIS imagery. Int J Remote Sens 32:4281–4310
Rao PK, Rao VV, Venkataratnam L (2002) Remote sensing: A technology for assessment of sugarcane crop acreage and yield. Sugar Tech, 4(3):97–101
Rockström J, Lannerstad M, Falkenmark M (2007) Assessing the water challenge of a new green revolution in developing countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(15):6253–6260
Seckler D, Amarasinghe U, Molden D, De Silva R, Barker R (1998) World water demand and supply, 1990 to 2025: scenarios and issues. Res Rep19. Int Water Manag Inst Colombo, Sri Lanka
Speelman S, D’Haese M, Buysse J, D’Haese L (2008) A measure for the efficiency of water use and its determinants, a case study of small-scale irrigation schemes in North-West Province, South Africa. Agric Syst 98(1):31–39
Suresh KK, Krishna Priya SR (2009) A study on pre-harvest forecast of sugarcane yield using climatic variables. Stat Appl 7&8 (1&2)(New Series):1–8
Toung TP, Bhuiyan SI (1994) Innovations towards improving water-use efficiency in Rice. In: Paper presented at the World Bank’s 1994 Water Resource Seminar, Landsdowne, VA, USA, 13–15 Dec 1994
Verma AK, Garg PK, Prasad KH, Dadhwal VK, Dubey SK, Kumar A (2021) Sugarcane yield forecasting model based on weather parameters. Sugar Tech 23(1):158–166
Vintrou E, Desbrosse A, Bégué A, Traoré S, Baron C, Seen DL (2012) Crop area mapping in West Africa using landscape stratification of MODIS time series and comparison with existing global land products. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 14:83–93
Whitcraft AK, Becker-Reshef I, Justice CO (2014) Agricultural growing season calendars derived from MODIS surface reflectance. Int J Dig Earth. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2014.894147
Wisiol K (1987) Choosing a basis for yield forecasts and estimates. In: Wisiol K, Hesketh JD (eds) Plant growth modelling for resource management, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 75–103
Zwart SJ, Bastiaanssen WG (2004) Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, Rice, cotton and maize. Agric Water Manag 69(2):115–133
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the Ministry of Earth Science (MoES) for providing the funds and to the Directorate of Agriculture, Uttarakhand, for providing historical crop yield data. We are also grateful to AMFU Roorkee, IIT Roorkee, and Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) for providing weather data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Weather Indices
Weather variable | Weather indices | |
---|---|---|
Unweighted weather indices | Weighted weather indices | |
Tmax | Z10 | Z11 |
Tmin | Z20 | Z21 |
Rain | Z30 | Z31 |
RHmax | Z40 | Z41 |
RHmin | Z50 | Z51 |
AET | Z60 | Z61 |
Tmax_Tmin | Z120 | Z121 |
Tmax_Rain | Z130 | Z131 |
Tmax_RHmax | Z140 | Z141 |
Tmax_RHmin | Z150 | Z151 |
Tmax_AET | Z160 | Z161 |
Tmin_Rain | Z230 | Z231 |
Tmin_RHmax | Z240 | Z241 |
Tmin_Rhmin | Z250 | Z251 |
Tmin_AET | Z260 | Z261 |
Rain_RHmax | Z340 | Z341 |
Rain_RHmin | Z350 | Z351 |
Rain_AET | Z360 | Z361 |
RHmax_Rhmin | Z450 | Z451 |
RHmax_AET | Z460 | Z461 |
RHmin_AET | Z560 | Z561 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhoutika, K., Das, D.P., Kumar, A., Pandey, A. (2022). Application of Remote Sensing and GIS in Crop Yield Forecasting and Water Productivity. In: Pandey, A., Chowdary, V.M., Behera, M.D., Singh, V.P. (eds) Geospatial Technologies for Land and Water Resources Management. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90479-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90479-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90478-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90479-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)