Skip to main content

Self-induced Back-Action Actuated Nanopore Electrophoresis (SANE) Sensing

  • 704 Accesses

Part of the Nanostructure Science and Technology book series (NST)

Abstract

We present a method to trap nanoscale analytes in double nanohole (DNH) nanoapertures integrated on top of solid-state nanopores (ssNPs). The analytes are propelled by an electrophoretic force from the cis towards the trans side of the nanopore but are trapped in the process when they have reached the vicinity of the DNH-ssNP interface. The self-induced back action (SIBA) force, created by the plasmonic field between the tips of the DNH, opposes the electrophoretic force and enables simultaneous optical and electrical sensing of a single nanoparticle for many seconds. The SIBA actuated nanopore electrophoresis (SANE) sensor was fabricated using two-beam gas field ion source (GFIS) focused ion beam (FIB). Firstly, Ne FIB milling was used to create the DNH features and was combined with end pointing to stop milling at the metal-dielectric interface. Subsequently, He FIB was used to drill a 25 nm nanopore through the center of the DNH. The capabilities of the device are demonstrated using a series of three experiments involving nanoparticles, high-affinity protein ligand interactions and low-affinity protein-ligand interactions. The presence of optical trapping in the SANE sensor extended electrical sensing and translocation times by up to four orders of magnitude over classical nanopores. In addition, SANE sensor measurements enabled quantification of bimodal optical-electrical parameters that were quantified concurrently for each trapping event, which enabled distinguishing analytes from each other, specific from non-specific binding events, and protein complex formation. Importantly, the SANE sensor enabled ultra-high sensitivity in protein-ligand interaction detection. Electrically driven focusing of reactants into the sensor’s nanoscopic optical trap volume enabled formation of significant bound fractions (30–50% range) at reactant concentrations up to three orders of magnitude lower than the free solution equilibrium binding constant. Furthermore, the SANE sensor could measure the off-binding rate of low-affinity (micromolar) protein-ligand interactions that are challenging to measure with current label-free commercial assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90339-8_13
  • Chapter length: 24 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-90339-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 13.1

Figure and caption reproduced with permissions by [2]

Fig. 13.2

Figure and caption reproduced with permissions by [2]

Fig. 13.3

Figure and caption reproduced with permissions by [2]

Fig. 13.4

©IOP Publishing. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved

Fig. 13.5

©IOP Publishing. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved

Fig. 13.6
Fig. 13.7

©IOP Publishing. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved

Fig. 13.8

©IOP Publishing. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved

Fig. 13.9

©IOP Publishing. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved

Fig. 13.10

©IOP Publishing. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved

References

  1. Mathieu L Juan, Reuven Gordon, Yuanjie Pang, Fatima Eftekhari, and Romain Quidant. Self-induced back-action optical trapping of dielectric nanoparticles. Nature Physics, 5(12):915–919, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muhammad Usman Raza, Sai Santosh Sasank Peri, Liang-Chieh Ma, Samir M Iqbal, and George Alexandrakis. Self-induced back action actuated nanopore electrophoresis (sane). Nanotechnology, 29(43):435501, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin Cressiot, Esther Braselmann, Abdelghani Oukhaled, Adrian H Elcock, Juan Pelta, and Patricia L Clark. Dynamics and energy contributions for transport of unfolded pertactin through a protein nanopore. ACS nano, 9(9):9050–9061, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed A. Al Balushi and Reuven Gordon. Label-free free solution single protein-small molecule binding kinetics: An optical tweezer approach. In Optics in the Life Sciences, page OtT2E.3. Optical Society of America, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L Kiran Swaroop Kumar and Reuven Gordon. Overlapping double-hole nanostructure in a metal film for localized field enhancement. IEEE Journal of selected topics in quantum electronics, 12(6):1228–1232, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LKS Kumar, A Lesuffleur, MC Hughes, and R Gordon. Double nanohole apex-enhanced transmission in metal films. Applied Physics B, 84(1-2):25–28, 2006.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mostafa Ghorbanzadeh, Steven Jones, Mohammad Kazem Moravvej-Farshi, and Reuven Gordon. Improvement of sensing and trapping efficiency of double nanohole apertures via enhancing the wedge plasmon polariton modes with tapered cusps. ACS Photonics, 4(5):1108–1113, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pau Mestres, Johann Berthelot, Srdjan S Aćimović, and Romain Quidant. Unraveling the optomechanical nature of plasmonic trapping. Light: Science & Applications, 5(7):e16092–e16092, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yuanjie Pang and Reuven Gordon. Optical trapping of 12 nm dielectric spheres using double-nanoholes in a gold film. Nano letters, 11(9):3763–3767, 2011.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Abhay Kotnala, Damon DePaoli, and Reuven Gordon. Sensing nanoparticles using a double nanohole optical trap. Lab on a Chip, 13(20):4142–4146, 2013.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abhay Kotnala and Reuven Gordon. Quantification of high-efficiency trapping of nanoparticles in a double nanohole optical tweezer. Nano letters, 14(2):853–856, 2014.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuanjie Pang and Reuven Gordon. Optical trapping of a single protein. Nano letters, 12:402–406, 2011.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed A Al Balushi, Ana Zehtabi-Oskuie, and Reuven Gordon. Observing single protein binding by optical transmission through a double nanohole aperture in a metal film. Biomedical optics express, 4(9):1504–1511, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmed A Al Balushi and Reuven Gordon. Label-free free-solution single-molecule protein–small molecule interaction observed by double-nanohole plasmonic trapping. ACS Photonics, 1(5):389–393, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed A Al Balushi and Reuven Gordon. A label-free untethered approach to single-molecule protein binding kinetics. Nano letters, 14(10):5787–5791, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jong Min Sung. Dielectrophoresis and optoelectronic tweezers for nanomanipulation. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mathilde Lepoitevin, Tianji Ma, Mikhael Bechelany, Jean-Marc Janot, and Sebastien Balme. Functionalization of single solid state nanopores to mimic biological ion channels: A review. Advances in colloid and interface science, 250:195–213, 2017.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patrick Abgrall and Nam Trung Nguyen. Nanofluidic devices and their applications. Analytical chemistry, 80(7):2326–2341, 2008.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Eszter Mádai, Bartłomiej Matejczyk, András Dallos, Mónika Valiskó, and Dezső Boda. Controlling ion transport through nanopores: modeling transistor behavior. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 20(37):24156–24167, 2018.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Matthias Firnkes, Daniel Pedone, Jelena Knezevic, Markus Doblinger, and Ulrich Rant. Electrically facilitated translocations of proteins through silicon nitride nanopores: conjoint and competitive action of diffusion, electrophoresis, and electroosmosis. Nano letters, 10(6):2162–2167, 2010.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jan KG Dhont, S Wiegand, S Duhr, and D Braun. Thermodiffusion of charged colloids: Single-particle diffusion. Langmuir, 23(4):1674–1683, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quanbo Jiang, Benoît Rogez, Jean-Benoît Claude, Guillaume Baffou, and Jérôme Wenger. Quantifying the role of the surfactant and the thermophoretic force in plasmonic nano-optical trapping. Nano Letters, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed A Al Balushi, Abhay Kotnala, Skyler Wheaton, Ryan M Gelfand, Yashaswini Rajashekara, and Reuven Gordon. Label-free free-solution nanoaperture optical tweezers for single molecule protein studies. Analyst, 140(14):4760–4778, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Junrong Wang, Jian Ma, Zhonghua Ni, Li Zhang, and Guoqing Hu. Effects of access resistance on the resistive-pulse caused by translocating of a nanoparticle through a nanopore. RSC Advances, 4(15):7601–7610, 2014.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Sai Santosh Sasank Peri, Manoj Kumar Sabnani, Muhammad Usman Raza, Elizabeth L Urquhart, Soroush Ghaffari, Jung Soo Lee, Min Jun Kim, Jon Weidanz, and George Alexandrakis. Quantification of low affinity binding interactions between natural killer cell inhibitory receptors and targeting ligands with a self-induced back-action actuated nanopore electrophoresis (sane) sensor. Nanotechnology, 32(4):045501, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sai Santosh Sasank Peri, Manoj K Sabnani, Muhammad Usman Raza, Soroush Ghaffari, Susanne Gimlin, Debra D Wawro, Jung Soo Lee, Min Jun Kim, Jon Weidanz, and George Alexandrakis. Detection of specific antibody-ligand interactions with a self-induced back-action actuated nanopore electrophoresis sensor. Nanotechnology, 31(8):085502, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mariet CW Feltkamp, Gienke R Vreugdenhil, Michel PM Vierboom, Elisabeth Ras, Sjoerd H van der Burg, Jan Ter Schegget, Cornelis JM Melief, and W Martin Kast. Cytotoxic t lymphocytes raised against a subdominant epitope offered as a synthetic peptide eradicate human papillomavirus type 16-induced tumors. European journal of immunology, 25(9):2638–2642, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K SRIVASTAVA Durgesh and B Lekha. Data classification using support vector machine. Journal of theoretical and applied information technology, 12(1):1–7, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Howard B Demuth, Mark H Beale, Orlando De Jess, and Martin T Hagan. Neural network design. Martin Hagan, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Andrew G Brooks, Phillip E Posch, Christopher J Scorzelli, Francisco Borrego, and John E Coligan. Nkg2a complexed with cd94 defines a novel inhibitory natural killer cell receptor. The Journal of experimental medicine, 185(4):795–800, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Russell E Vance, Jennifer R Kraft, John D Altman, Peter E Jensen, and David H Raulet. Mouse cd94/nkg2a is a natural killer cell receptor for the nonclassical major histocompatibility complex (mhc) class i molecule qa-1b. The Journal of experimental medicine, 188(10):1841–1848, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jennifer R Kraft, Russell E Vance, Jan Pohl, Amy M Martin, David H Raulet, and Peter E Jensen. Analysis of qa-1bpeptide binding specificity and the capacity of cd94/nkg2a to discriminate between qa-1–peptide complexes. The Journal of experimental medicine, 192(5):613–624, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wei-Feng Lo, Helena Ong, Eleanor S Metcalf, and Mark J Soloski. T cell responses to gram-negative intracellular bacterial pathogens: a role for cd8+ t cells in immunity to salmonella infection and the involvement of mhc class ib molecules. The Journal of Immunology, 162(9):5398–5406, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wei-Feng Lo, Amina S Woods, Amy DeCloux, Robert J Cotter, Eleanor S Metcalf, and Mark J Soloski. Molecular mimicry mediated by mhc class ib molecules after infection with gram-negative pathogens. Nature medicine, 6(2):215–218, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mar Valés-Gómez, Hugh T Reyburn, Robert A Erskine, Miguel López-Botet, and Jack L Strominger. Kinetics and peptide dependency of the binding of the inhibitory nk receptor cd94/nkg2-a and the activating receptor cd94/nkg2-c to hla-e. The EMBO journal, 18(15):4250–4260, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maxim Belkin, Shu-Han Chao, Magnus P Jonsson, Cees Dekker, and Aleksei Aksimentiev. Plasmonic nanopores for trapping, controlling displacement, and sequencing of dna. ACS nano, 9(11):10598–10611, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wei Zhan, Kui Gao, Chenjun Zhu, and Wuzhou Song. Optical trapping using all silicon nanoantennas with ultra-high electric field enhancement. Applied Physics Letters, 117(24):241102, 2020.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. J Rosenstein, V Ray, M Drndic, and KL Shepard. Nanopore dna sensors in cmos with on-chip low-noise preamplifiers. In 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, pages 874–877. IEEE, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jacob K Rosenstein, Meni Wanunu, Christopher A Merchant, Marija Drndic, and Kenneth L Shepard. Integrated nanopore sensing platform with sub-microsecond temporal resolution. Nature methods, 9(5):487, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Marlon Stoeckius, Christoph Hafemeister, William Stephenson, Brian Houck-Loomis, Pratip K Chattopadhyay, Harold Swerdlow, Rahul Satija, and Peter Smibert. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nature methods, 14(9):865, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lukas Neumeier, Romain Quidant, Darrick E Chang Self-induced back-action optical trapping in nanophotonic systems New Journal of Physics, 17(12):123008, 2015.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Soeren Eyhusen and Mr. Chuong Huynh for permitting us with the access and providing technical guidance on focused ion beam milling at the Zeiss ORION NanoFab facility in Peabody, MA. We are also thankful to all the engineers and staff at the Shimadzu Institute Nanotechnology Research Center at the University of Texas at Arlington for their support and guidance. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Cancer Institute (1R21CA240220-01A1) and the National Science Foundation (CBET#2022398 and CBET#2022374).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Alexandrakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Renkes, S., Peri, S.S.S., Raza, M.U., Weidanz, J., Kim, M.J., Alexandrakis, G. (2022). Self-induced Back-Action Actuated Nanopore Electrophoresis (SANE) Sensing. In: Bowen, W., Vollmer, F., Gordon, R. (eds) Single Molecule Sensing Beyond Fluorescence . Nanostructure Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90339-8_13

Download citation