Skip to main content

Penalizing Neural Network and Autoencoder for the Analysis of Marketing Measurement Scales in Service Marketing Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI and Analytics for Smart Cities and Service Systems (ICSS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Operations Research ((LNOR))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses penalized neural networks to establish a stable neural network model for survey data measured by traditional marketing scales. Interpreting estimated hidden units and weights in a neural network is often challenging because of its non-identifiability. Factor models in social science are a traditional non-identifiable model for analyzing questionnaire measurements. Hence, many studies have proposed identification conditions. Accordingly, we propose penalty functions that represent the equivalent identification conditions in standard factor models to reduce the non-identifiability and instability of neural networks. We apply these penalty functions in the empirical analysis of autoencoders with e-service quality scale data. The proposed method provides an explainable result that is theoretically reasonable in that e-service quality scale. While comparing the penalized autoencoder with traditional factor models, we discuss potential applications and tasks of the proposed method in service marketing research for further exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note: Figure 2 displays only the relationship between observed variables and factor scores.Additionally, the intercept is assumed to be equal to zero in the usual case.

  2. 2.

    Note: Although the data were gathered from three categories (food and drink, fashion, and daily necessities), we used only one category data (food and drink) due to limitations of space.

References

  1. de Véricourt, F., Perakis, G.: Frontiers in service science: the management of data analytics services and future directions: New Challenges Serv. Sci. 12(4), 121–129 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hollebeek, L.D., Sprott, D.E., Brady, M.K.: Rise of the machines? customer engagement in automated service interactions. J. Serv. Res. 24(1), 3–8 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, M.H., Rust, R.T.: Artificial intelligence in service. J. Serv. Res. 21(2), 155–172 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pemer, F.: Enacting professional service work in times of digitalization and potential disruption. J. Serv. Res. 1094670520916801 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoganarasimhan, H.: Search personalization using machine learning. Manag. Sci. 66(3), 1045–1070 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan, F., Xiong, J., Wang, G.: On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A survey. Preprint at https://arxiv. org/abs/2001.02522 (2020)

  7. Boratto, L., Carta, S., Fenu, G., Saia, R.: Using neural word embeddings to model user behavior and detect user segments. Knowl.-Based Syst. 108, 5–14 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giatsoglou, M., Vozalis, M.G., Diamantaras, K., Vakali, A., Sarigiannidis, G., Chatzisavvas, K.C.: Sentiment analysis leveraging emotions and word embeddings. Expert Syst. Appl. 69, 214–224 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Antun, V., Renna, F., Poon, C., Adcock, B., Hansen, A.C.: On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of AI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(48), 30088–30095 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chugh, M., Whigham, P.A., Dick, G.: Stability of word embeddings using word2vec. In: Mitrovic, T., Xue, B., Li, X. (eds.) AI 2018: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11320. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03991-2_73

  11. Korkobi, T., Djemel, M., Chtourou, M.: Stability analysis of neural networks-based system identification. Model. Simul. Eng. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rudin, C., Carlson, D.: The secrets of machine learning: ten things you wish you had known earlier to be more effective at data analysis. In: Operations Research & Management Science in the Age of Analytics, pp. 44–72, Informs (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wendlandt, L., Kummerfeld, J.K., Mihalcea, R.: Factors Influencing the Surprising Instability of Word Embeddings, arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09692 (2018)

  14. Anderson, T.W., Rubin, H.: Statistical inference in factor analysis. In: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 5, pp.111–150 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bai, J., Ng, S.: Principal components estimation and identification of static factors. J. Econ. 176(1), 18–29 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peeters, C.F.: Rotational uniqueness conditions under oblique factor correlation metric. Psychometrika 77, 288–292 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 (2017)

  18. Moody, J., Hanson, S., Krogh, A., Hertz, J.A.: A simple weight decay can improve generalization. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 4, 950–957 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blut, M.: E-Service quality: development of a hierarchical model. J. Retail. 92(4), 500–517 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodfellow, Y., Bengio, A.: Courville and Y. Deep Learning, Cambridge MIT press, Bengio (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hinton, G.E., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786), 504–507 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Adachi, K.: Matrix-based Introduction to Multivariate Data Analysis, Singapore, Springer Singapore (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tipping, M.E., Bishop, C.M.: Probabilistic principal component analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. (Stat. Meth.) 61(3), 611–622 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato, T.: Bayesian estimation for identifiable topic models with latent dirichlet allocation, SSRN Electron. J. https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3721769 (2020). (unpublished)

  25. Baldi, P., Hornik, K.: Neural networks and principal component analysis: learning from examples without local minima. Neural Netw. 2(1), 53–58 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bishop, C.M. (ed.): Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. ISS, Springer, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45528-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourlard, H., Kamp, Y.: Auto-association by multilayer perceptrons and singular value decomposition. Biol. Cybern. 59(4), 291–294 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sato, T.: Construct validation for a nonlinear measurement model in marketing and consumer behavior research. Data Sci. Serv. Res. Discuss. Pap. 101 (2019) (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sato, T.: Investigating the impacts of customer experience and attribute performances on overall ratings using online review data: nonlinear estimation and visualization with a neural network. Data Sci. Serv. Res. Discuss. Pap. 27(105), 27-62 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, Z., Frankwick, G.L., Ramirez, E.: Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new product success: a knowledge fusion perspective. J. Bus. Res. 69(5), 1562–1566 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the partial support of JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20K22125. The author would also like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review. Additionally, the two reviewers involved provided helpful and insightful comments that improved the overall quality of the manuscript, for which the author is thankful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshikuni Sato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sato, T. (2021). Penalizing Neural Network and Autoencoder for the Analysis of Marketing Measurement Scales in Service Marketing Applications. In: Qiu, R., Lyons, K., Chen, W. (eds) AI and Analytics for Smart Cities and Service Systems. ICSS 2021. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90275-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics