Skip to main content

Quality Model for CloudIot Applied in Ambient Assisted Living (AAL)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies (TICEC 2021)

Abstract

Nowadays, CloudIoT is used in several domains. Among them, AAL applications, where it can support the monitoring of certain variables related to the wellbeing of older adults at real-time. They store and manage personal information about users and vital signs, which are essential to be transmitted securely and reliably. Then, this paper presents a quality model focused on the CloudIoT layers in Ambient Assisted Living. It evaluates security, usability, and reliability, applied on the AAL domain, and focused on each of CloudIoT layers: Cloud Computing, Fog Computing, and Edge Computing. Also, an empirical evaluation of the AAL applications evaluation process in CloudIoT is presented. This method was evaluated using the Method Evaluation Model (MEM), 15 experts in computer science participated in the evaluation, the obtained results show that people find that the method is useful, easy to use, and allows to evaluate the viability of CloudIoT applications in AAL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tung, Y.-H., Tseng2, S.-S., Kuo1, Y.-Y.: Cloud Environment, pp. 97–100 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liang, X., Yan, Z., Zhang, P.: Security, privacy, and anonymity in computation, communication, and storage. In: SpaCCS 2016, pp. 155–167 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72395-2

  3. Benabbes, S., Hemam, S.M.: An approach based on (Tasks-VMs) classification and MCDA for dynamic load balancing in the CloudIoT. In: Hatti, M. (ed.) Smart Energy Empowerment in Smart and Resilient Cities. ICAIRES 2019. LNCS, vol. 102, pp. 387–396. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37207-1_41

  4. Kim, M., Park, J.H., Lee, N.Y.: A quality model for IoT service. In: Park, J., Pan, Y., Yi, G., Loia, V. (eds.) Advances in Computer Science and Ubiquitous Computing. UCAWSN 2016, CUTE 2016, CSA 2016. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 421, pp. 497–504. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3023-9_77

  5. Khan, M.A., Salah, K.: IoT security: review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 82, 395–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarma, S., Brock, D., Ashton, K.: The networked physical world.TR MIT-AUTOID-WH-001 MIT Auto-ID Centre, pp. 1–16 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Botta, A., de Donato, W., Persico, V., Pescapé, A.: On the integration of cloud computing and Internet of Things. In: 2014 International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, pp. 23–30 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aazam, M., Huh, E.-N.: Fog computing and smart gateway based communication for cloud of things. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Future IoT and Cloud, pp. 464–470. IEEE Computer Society, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization: Disability and health (2020). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health

  11. Darwish, A., Hassanien, A.E., Elhoseny, M., Sangaiah, A.K., Muhammad, K.: The impact of the hybrid platform of IoT and Cloud on healthcare systems: opportunities, challenges, and open problems. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 10, 4151–4166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0659-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dohr, A., Modre-Opsrian, R., Drobics, M., Hayn, D., Schreier, G.: The Internet of Things for ambient assisted living. In: 2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pp. 804–809 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cedillo, P., Sanchez, C., Campos, K., Bermeo, A.: A systematic literature review on devices and systems for AAL: solutions and trends from different user perspectives. In: ICEDEG 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2018.8372367

  14. ISO: International Standard ISO/IEC 12207: Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saini, G.L., Panwar, D., Kumar, S., Singh, V.: A systematic literature review and comparative study of different software quality models. J. Discrete Math. Sci. Crypt. 23, 585–593 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2020.1747188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Macedo, D.D.J., de Araújo, G.M., Dutra, M.L., Dutra, S.T., Lezana, Á.G.R.: Toward an efficient healthcare CloudIoT architecture by using a game theory approach. Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl. 27, 189–200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X19844548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garces, L., Oquendo, F., Nakagawa, E.Y.: A quality model for AAL software systems. In: Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 175–180 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2016.46

  18. McNaull, J., Augusto, J.C., Mulvenna, M., McCullagh, P.: Data and information quality issues in ambient assisted living systems. J. Data Inf. Qual. 4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2378016.2378020

  19. Araujo, V., Mitra, K., Saguna, S., Åhlund, C.: Performance evaluation of FIWARE: a cloud-based IoT platform for smart cities. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 132, 250–261 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2018.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanchez, C., Cedillo, P., Vazquez, A.: A memory game for elderly people: development and evaluation. In: ICEDEG 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096862

  21. Ashouri, M., Lorig, F., Davidsson, P., Spalazzese, R.: Edge computing simulators for IoT system design: an analysis of qualities and metrics. Future Internet 11, 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11110235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng, X., Martin, P., Brohman, K., Xu, L.: Cloudqual: a quality model for cloud services. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 10, 1527–1536 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2306329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Idri, A., Bachiri, M., Fernández-Alemán, J.L.: A framework for evaluating software product quality of pregnancy monitoring mobile personal health records. J. Med. Syst. 40, 1–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0415-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hakim, H., Sellami, A., Abdallah, H.: Evaluating security in web application design using functional and structural size measurements. In: Proceedings IWSM 2016 and Mensura 2016, pp. 182–190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSM-Mensura.2016.036

  25. Calabrese, J., Muñoz, R., Pasini, A., Esponda, S., Boracchia, M., Pesado, P.: Assistant for the evaluation of software product quality characteristics proposed by ISO/IEC 25010 based on GQM-defined metrics. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 790, 164–175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75214-3_16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Islam, S., Falcarin, P.: Measuring security requirements for software security. In: Proceedings of CIS 2011, pp. 70–75 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS.2011.6169137

  27. Basili, V., Caldiera, G., Rombach, D.: Goal question metric approach. Encycl. Softw. Eng. 1, 528–532 (1994). ISBN: 0-471-54004-8, John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cedillo, P., Bermeo, A., Piedra-García, D., Tenezaca-Sari, P.: CloudIoTSecurity: evaluating the security in cloud IoT applications (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Komiyama, T., Fukuzumi, S., Azuma, M., Washizaki, H., Tsuda, N.: Usability of software-intensive systems from developers’ point of view. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience, HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12181, pp. 450–463. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49059-1_33

  30. Enriquez, E.M.L., Brito, J.F.B., Orellana, I.P.C.: Evaluating the usability of online social networks used by older people. In: Proceedings - 2017 International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science, INCISCOS 2017, pp. 316–322 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/INCISCOS.2017.40

  31. ISO: ISO/IEC 25040. https://iso25000.com/index.php/normas-iso-25000/iso-25040

  32. Shah, J.L., Bhat, H.F., Khan, A.I.: CloudIoT: towards seamless and secure integration of cloud computing with Internet of Things. Int. J. Digital Crime Forensics 11, 1–22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDCF.2019070101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou, P., Wang, Z., Li, W., Jiang, N.: Quality model of cloud service. In: Proceedings - 2015 IEEE 17th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, pp. 1418–1423 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC-CSS-ICESS.2015.134

  34. Bagherzadeh, L., Shahinzadeh, H., Shayeghi, H., Dejamkhooy, A., Bayindir, R., Iranpour, M.: Integration of Cloud Computing and IoT (CloudIoT) in smart grids: benefits, challenges, and solutions. In: CISPSSE 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPSSE49931.2020.9212195

  35. Montagud, S., Abrahão, S., Insfran, E.: A systematic review of quality attributes and measures for software product lines. Softw. Qual. J. 20, 425–486 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-011-9146-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tzeng, J.R., Li, S.H., Chen, C.H.: Applying QFD to improve the project management for cloud systems. Appl. Mech. Mater. 121–126, 3185–3189 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.121-126.3185

  37. Hakim, H., Sellami, A., Abdallah, H.B., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. In: Proceedings IWSM 2016 and Mensura 2016, pp. 182–190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSM-Mensura.2016.036

  38. Pfizer: LivingWith App—This Is Living With Cancer—Official Site. https://www.thisislivingwithcancer.com/living-with-app

  39. Insfran, E., Cedillo, P., Fernández, A., Abrahão, S., Matera, M.: Evaluating the usability of mashups applications. In: Proceedings - 2012 8th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, QUATIC 2012, pp. 323–326 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2012.28

  40. Moody, D.L.: Dealing with complexity: a practical method for representing large entity relationship models (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experiment process. In: Experimentation in Software Engineering, pp. 73–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2_6

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the research projects: “Fog Computing applied to monitoring devices used in assisted living environments. Case study: platform for the elderly” and “Design of architectures and interaction models for assisted living environments for elderly people. Case study: ludic and social environments”. Hence, the authors thank to DIUC of Universidad de Cuenca for its academic and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priscila Cedillo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cáceres, M.C., Peralta, D., Bermeo, A., Sánchez-Zhunio, C., Cedillo, P. (2021). Quality Model for CloudIot Applied in Ambient Assisted Living (AAL). In: Salgado Guerrero, J.P., Chicaiza Espinosa, J., Cerrada Lozada, M., Berrezueta-Guzman, S. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies. TICEC 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89941-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89941-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89941-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics