Skip to main content

On the Design of Therapy Tracker: A Cross-platform Medication Management Application with Augmented Reality and Machine Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 1 (FTC 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 358))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1165 Accesses

Abstract

In this research a prototype of a virtual assistant mobile application, called Therapy Tracker is introduced. The application detects and captures prescription information and provides automated assistance in scheduling, reminding and tracking medications by keeping a list of medications, dosages, refill information, and prescription documentation. Despite the rapid growth and recent successes, creating such auto-assistant systems remains a challenging task. Augmented Reality technologies are used in our app to provide virtual information that combines real world situations, such as detecting and highlighting the correct medication from a group. The virtual assistant also guides the user through both visual and auditory alerts. In this paper we present Therapy Tracker, the interface design, architectural framework we designed and developed to support the system, and the results of a usability study conducted from real field studies. Our system was tested with 30 participants and achieved a mean SUS usability score of 84.5% (high).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    SUS positive rated items: Item I1: “I think that I would like to use this system frequently” Item I3: “I thought the system was easy to use”, Item I5: “I found the various functions in this system were well integrated” Item I7 “I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly” Item I9: “I felt very confident using the system.”.

  2. 2.

    SUS negative rated items: Item I2: “I found the system unnecessarily complex” Item I4: “I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system”, Item I6: “I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system” Item I8 “I found the system very cumbersome to use” Item I10: “I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system.”.

References

  1. Barnard, Y., Bradley, M.D., Hodgson, F., Lloyd, A.D.: Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1715–1724 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer, T.: Top 100 corporate r & d spenders in Canada. Report (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty usability scale”. Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor and Francis, London (1996). System Usablity Scale

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, F.C.: World health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Brit. J. Sports Med. 54(24), 1451–1462 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diaper, D., Stanton, N.A.: The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Divine, H.: Safe medication use in the older adult. Report, University of Kentucky, College of Pharmacy (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dotter, T., Johnson, V.: Interactive visual aid adoption within pharmaceutical sales organizations. Report (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. EmergenResearch: Ai-enabled medical imaging solutions market size (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Figma: Collaborative interface design tool (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Google: Firebasevision (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hales, C.M.: National health and nutrition examination survey: prescription drug use among adults aged 40–79 in the United States and Canada. Report, National Center for Health Statistics, United States (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N.: Human Mental Workload. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kosse, R.C., Bouvy, M.L., Belitser, S.V., de Vries, T.W., van der Wal, P.S., Koster, E.S.: Effective engagement of adolescent asthma patients with mobile health-supporting medication adherence. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7(3), e12411 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosseim, P.: Personal health information protection act (phipa) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goodkind, D., Kowal, P., He, W.: An aging world : international population reports, p. 2016. Government Printing Office, Washington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mcgurgan, K.: Data-ink ratio and task complexity in graph comprehension. PhD thesis (2015

    Google Scholar 

  20. McTavish, S.: Recognize text in images with ml kit on android (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mikulic, M.: Pharmaceutical market: worldwide revenue 2001–2020. Report, Statica (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, R.G.: Beyond ANOVA: Basics of Applied Statistics. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Moran, K.: Young adults/millenials as web users (ages 18–25) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization: World report on ageing and health (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., Carey, T.: Human-Computer Interaction: Concepts And Design. Addison Wesley, Boston (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Santo, K., et al.: Medication reminder applications to improve adherence in coronary heart disease: a randomised clinical trial. Heart 105(4), 323–329 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. StatisticsCanada: Canadian health measures survey (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stewart, C.: Percentage of U.S. seniors that were interested in using select health technologies in the future as of 2018, by current usage. Report (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson, E. F.: Pharmaceutical industry profile (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wooley M.: Bluetooth core specification version 5.1 feature overview. Technical report (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward R. Sykes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sykes, E.R., Tofighi, G., Wang, Y., Ganguly, D., Janwaar, A., Singh, A. (2022). On the Design of Therapy Tracker: A Cross-platform Medication Management Application with Augmented Reality and Machine Learning. In: Arai, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 1. FTC 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 358. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89906-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics