Skip to main content

Sustainability and Happiness as “Promoting Life”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Linking Sustainability and Happiness

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being ((CQLWB))

Abstract

While various authors have tried to merge happiness and sustainability together in such concepts as sustainable happiness and sustainable well-being, among others, the link is tenuous as the theories built around these concepts are incomplete. In this work, I strive to fill this gap by integrating further conceptualizations of the value of life. While happiness and sustainability are not one in the same, since someone can be happy in unsustainable ways and since something can be performed sustainably without causing happiness, I reflect on the overlap where happiness and sustainability come together. This overlap seems to be the most meaningful and purposeful notions of the terms and the sense in which they have their most normative force. I will attempt to identify the overlap to define both happiness and sustainability as the promotion of life. I will evaluate whether and how this stipulative, working definition for these terms can be useful for practical guidance in real projects in an attempt to bridge theory and application. I review the place of happiness and positive psychology in well-being philosophy and recent advances incorporating sustainability into well-being theory. I also discuss various conceptions of the value of life. I then incorporate these preceding philosophies together to form a conceptual map of the variety of assessments of life that exist. From these concepts, I develop preliminary principles that might serve as a guide for practical living, for happier, more sustainable, and more ethical lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For purposes here, I will alternate between articles a and the in front this term. I do not mean to definitively declare that there is one or are multiple lives that could be good life in the big question sense that seems to suggest that that life is the best (possible) life.

  2. 2.

    They may be potentially synonymous with each other or with the good life.

  3. 3.

    I intentionally put the article in parentheses to indicate that the life being evaluated might be singular (an individual), plural (a group), or a hybrid (some mix or relationship between individuals and groups.

  4. 4.

    There may be other conceptualizations besides the foundational types listed here. Some of these perspectives have been augmented by modern thinkers, and still others have been created.

  5. 5.

    The difference between happiness as pleasure and hedonistic sense of pleasure used in well-being might be whether discussing an experience in a moment or the balance of pleasure over pain over a period of time.

  6. 6.

    Haybron (2020) also identifies additional factors that might be associated with happiness, well-being, or a good life, such as: a sense of meaning or purpose, meaningful or worthwhile activities, engagement in interesting and challenging activities, achieving goals, personal growth, relatedness, supportive relationships, autonomy or control, competence, material and physical security, a positive outlook, religion, good governance, trust, helping others, values, not being unemployed, connection with the natural environment, household income, possession of luxury conveniences, satisfaction with standard of living, and psychosocial prosperity, which includes “being treated with respect in the last day, having family and friends to count on, learning something new, doing what they do best, and choosing how their time was spent.”

  7. 7.

    O’Brien also uses the terms health, healthy lifestyle, and quality of life, which may need to be mapped in relation to happiness and well-being.

  8. 8.

    I cannot fit the sense of the meaning of life, meaning purpose that one or any of us is here, exists, or is alive, in the space provided here.

  9. 9.

    Such a view might have offensive implications for people who are not fully able, but that meaning is not endorsed here.

  10. 10.

    Due to space, I will not pursue a tangent about good deaths here, even though they might be a necessary component of a good life.

References

  • Ackrill, J. L. (1974). Aristotle on eudaimonia. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics (pp. 15–34). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, J. M. S., Bahlul, R., Betz, M., Bock, G. L., Cowley, C., Dew, R., Elder, A., Gay, W. C., Ketcham, C., Man-to, T., & Lewis, C. D. (Eds.). (2016). The philosophy of forgiveness (Vol. 1). Vernon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassoulis, N. (n.d.). Virtue ethics. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/virtue/#SH3a

  • Bethem, J. (2018). Life within energy policy. Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 6(1), 69–85. https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/issue/view/91

  • Broome, J. (2004). Weighing lives.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J. (2015, February 23). Climate change ethics: Life and death [Presentation]. Stanford Energy Seminar, Stanford Precourt Institute of Energy and Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJlkXzYkT3g

  • Callahan, D. (1969). The sanctity of life. In D. R. Cutler (Ed.), Updating life and death (pp. 181–223). Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicovacki, P. (2007). Reverence for life: A moral value or the moral value? Lyceum, 9(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R. (2017). Well-being. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, D. K. (2007). Schweitzer reconsidered: The applicability of reverence for life as environmental philosophy. Environmental Ethics, 29, 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. (1978). On being morally considerable. The Journal of Philosophy, 75(6), 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardwig, J. (1997). Is there a duty to die? The Hastings Center Report, 27(2), 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. (2015). Valuing health: Well-being, freedom, & suffering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, D. (2020). Happiness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/

  • Hedberg, T. (2020). The environmental impact of overpopulation: The ethics of procreation. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstein, O. J. (2013). Why ‘nonexistent people’ do not have zero wellbeing but no wellbeing at all. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 30(2), 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. (1998). Sustainability and beyond. Ecological Economics, 24, 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienstra, N., Karskens, M., & Imants, J. (2014). Three approaches to doing philosophy: A proposal for grouping philosophical exercises in classroom teaching. Metaphilosophy, 45(2), 288–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjell, O. N. (2011). Sustainable well-being: A potential synergy between sustainability and well-being research. Review of General Psychology, 15(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2016). Structure of well-being: An exploratory study of the distinction between individual well-being and community well-being and the importance of intersubjective community well-being. In Y. Kee, S. J. Lee, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Social factors and community well-being (pp. 13–37). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac. Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R. (2014). Well-doing: Personal projects and the quality of lives. Theory and Research in Education, 12(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514545847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1972). Aristotle on eudaimonia. Phronesis, 17(3), 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, C. (2013). Happiness and sustainability together at last! Sustainable happiness. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(4), 228–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope Francis. (2015). Encyclical letter Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis on care for our common home. The Holy See, Libreria Editrice Vaticana. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html

  • Schweitzer, A. (1936). The ethics of reverence for life. Christendom, 1, 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. (2003). The new subjective medicine: Taking the patient’s point of view on health care and health. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1595–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human Development Index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi

  • Wittgenstein, L. V. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans. & R. Rhees, Eds.). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittner, L. S. (1995). Blacklisting Schweitzer. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1995 (May/June), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Bethem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bethem, J. (2022). Sustainability and Happiness as “Promoting Life”. In: Cloutier, S., El-Sayed, S., Ross, A., Weaver, M. (eds) Linking Sustainability and Happiness. Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89559-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89559-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89558-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89559-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics