Skip to main content

Toward a Questionnaire to Assess Biology Student Teachers’ Knowledge of the Nature of Scientific Inquiry (NOSI)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Research in Biology Education

Abstract

Knowledge about the nature of scientific inquiry (NOSI) is not only an integral part of scientific literacy, but also essential for living and working as responsible citizens in the twenty-first century, and facing the danger of “fake science”. Although various NOSI instruments already exist, they primarily focus either on a different target group, i.e. pupils, place their content-related emphasis on experimentation, and/or are based on open-ended or multiple-choice testing response formats. To address this instrument gap, a closed-ended questionnaire with a dichotomous and a post-decision confidence rating response scale was developed and tested to evaluate the respondents’ understanding of eight NOSI aspects in a detailed yet economical manner. 148 German freshman biology student teachers participated in a sequential cross-sectional pilot study. First results indicate acceptable instrument reliability. There are certain items that seem to be answered correctly rather by coincidence or test intelligence, whereas others seem to suggest participants’ naïve NOSI views, or NOSI misconceptions. These findings imply that there is a need to further explore biology student teachers’ NOSI understanding to improve future university teaching. Moreover, further validity analyses for the newly developed testing instrument should be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayyavoo, G., Bencze, J., Corry, A., & van Oostveen, R. (2002). Correlational studies in school science: Beyond experimentation. OISE Papers in STSE Education, 3, 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L. (1996). Correlational studies in school science: Breaking the science-experiment-certainty connection. School Science Review, 78(282), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, S. (2019). On serendipity in science: Discovery at the intersection of chance and wisdom. Synthese, 196(6), 2385–2406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2017). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden. Beltz Verlagsgruppe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KMK. (2005). Beschlüsse der Kultusministerkonferenz – Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Luchterhand München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A., & Peter, S. M. (2018). Questionable research practices in student final theses – Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor’s perceived attitudes. PLoS One, 13(8), e0203470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry-the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartels, S., Jimenez, J., Akubo, M., Aly, S., et al. (2019). An international collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students’ understandings of scientific inquiry: Establishing a baseline. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 486–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig-Mayerhofer, W. (2017). ILMES – Internet-Lexikon der Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung: Faktorenanalyse. Retrieved 5th October, 2020, from http://wlm.userweb.mwn.de/Ilmes/ilm_f3.htm

  • Mayer, J. (2007). Erkenntnisgewinnung als wissenschaftliches Problemlösen. In Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung (pp. 177–186). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mesci, G., Çavuş-Güngören, S., & Yesildag-Hasancebi, F. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service science teachers’ NOSI views and related teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Retrieved 1 October 2020, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/

  • Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological methods, 5(3), 343.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Retrieved 30 October 2020, from http://www.r-project.org/index.html

  • Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximise scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. R. (2020). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-el-Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temiz, B. K., Taşar, M. F., & Tan, M. (2006). Development and validation of a multiple format test of science process skills. International Education Journal, 7(7), 1007–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, G.-B., & Köller, O. (2018). Test-wiseness: ein unterschätztes Konstrukt? Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 8(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellnitz, N., & Mayer, J. (2013). Erkenntnismethoden in der Biologie – Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Kompetenzmodells. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 19, 315–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zion, M., Schwartz, R. S., Rimerman-Shmueli, E., & Adler, I. (2018). Supporting teachers’ understanding of nature of science and inquiry through personal experience and perception of inquiry as a dynamic process. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1281–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinne Charlotte Wacker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wacker, C.C., Barth, M., Stahl, C., Schlüter, K. (2022). Toward a Questionnaire to Assess Biology Student Teachers’ Knowledge of the Nature of Scientific Inquiry (NOSI). In: Korfiatis, K., Grace, M. (eds) Current Research in Biology Education. Contributions from Biology Education Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89480-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89480-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89479-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89480-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics