Abstract
After several years of implementing UBI experiments, a growing number of analysts and commentators are exploring the possibility of how to move from experimenting to implementing basic income as a real nation-wide policy. For this reason, in the first section of this chapter, we explore the pros and cons of considering basic income as an object of study to be tested through different social experiments—such as randomized control trials (RCT)—or of considering it a real policy option, in which case, political and scientific implications seem far more profound. In the second section of the chapter, we assess to what extent and in which manners these experiments, and policies can be altered by political intervention or manipulation, and then if the so-called evidence-based policies (such as the tested basic income models) will always be condemned as a utopian project rather than a serious scientific program to inform public policies empirically and honestly. Consequently, and considering the most recent concerns of the basic income community, we thirdly and lastly explore the question whether it is preferable to continue experimenting or if these efforts should be discarded in favor of direct lobbying from different social, political, and academic pulpits to definitely implement a real basic income policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cartwright, Nancy, and Jeremy Hardie. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing it Better. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
De Wispelaere, Jurgen, Antti Halmetoja, and Ville-Veikko Pulkka. “The Rise (and Fall) of the Basic Income Experiment in Finland.” CESifo Forum. ifo Institute—Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich 19, no. 3 (2018): 15–19.
Deaton, Angus. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning About Development.” In Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, Dawn Langan Teele (ed.). New Haven & London: Yale University, 2014.
Füllbrunn, Sascha, Lei Delsen, and Jana Vyrastekova. “Experimental Economics: A Test-Bed for the Unconditional Basic Income?” In Empirical Research on an Unconditional Basic Income in Europe, Lei Delsen (ed.), 171–199. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2019.
Groot, Loek. “Reasons for Launching a Basic Income Experiment.” Basic Income Studies 1, no. 2 (2006): 1–7.
Groot, Loek, and Robert van der Veen. “Clues and Leads in the Policy Debate on Basic Income in the Netherlands.” In Basic Income on the Agenda: Policy Objectives and Political Chances, Robert van der Veen and Loek Groot (eds.), 197–223. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2000.
Haynes, Laura, Owaine Service, Ben Goldacre, and David Torgerson. Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team, 2012.
Heckman, James J. “Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation Revisited.” National Bureau of Economic Research Technical, 2020: Working Paper n. 107.
De Wispelaere, Jurgen, and Louise Haagh. “Introduction: Basic Income in European Welfare States: Opportunities and Constraints.” Social Policy & Society 18, no. 2 (2019): 237–242.
Laín, Bru. “Basic Income Experiments: Limits, Constraints and Opportunities.” Ethical Perspectives 28, no. 1 (2021): 89–101.
Leigh, Andrew. Randomistas: How Radical Researchers Changed Our World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.
Noguera, José A. “The Political Debate on Basic Income and Welfare Reform in Spain.” Social Policy & Society 18, no. 2 (2019): 289–299.
Noguera, José A., and Jurgen De Wispelaere. “A Plea for the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Basic Income Research.” Basic Income Studies, 2006: 1–6.
Shapiro, Ian. 2014. “Methods Are Like People: If You Focus Only on What They Can’t Do, You Will Always Be Disappointed.” In Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, Dawn Langan Tee (ed.), 228–239. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Standing, Guy. “How Cash Transfers Promote the Case for Basic Income.” Basic Income Studies 3, no. 1 (2008): 1–30.
Standing, Guy. “Basic Income Pilot Schemes: Seventeen Design and Evaluation Imperatives.” In Wege zum Grundeinkommen, D. Jacobi, and W. Strengmann-Kuhn (ed.), 133–152. Berlin: Bildungswerk, 2012.
Tena Camporesi, Alberto. “La Renta Básica Universal basada en la evidencia.” Política y Sociedad 55, no. 3 (2018): 851–871.
Van Parijs, Philippe, and Yannick Vanderborght. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Virjo, Ilkka. “A Piece of the Puzzle: A Comment on the Basic Income Experiment Debate.” Basic Income Studies 1, no. 2 (2006): 1–5.
Widerquist, Karl. “A Failure to Communicate: What (if Anything) Can We Learn from the Negative Income Tax Experiments?” Journal of Socio-Economics, 2005: 1–51.
Widerquist, Karl. A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers and Citizens. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018a.
Widerquist, Karl. “The Devil’s in the Caveats: A Brief Discussion of the Difficulties of Basic Income Experiments.” CESifo Forum. ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich 19, no. 3 (2018b): 30–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merrill, R., Neves, C., Laín, B. (2022). From Experiment to Policy Implementation?. In: Basic Income Experiments. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89120-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89120-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89119-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89120-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)