Skip to main content

Trustworthiness Requirements: The Pix Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 13011))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The advent of socio-technical, cyber-physical and artificial intelligence systems has broadened the scope of requirements engineering, which must now deal with new classes of requirements, concerning ethics, privacy and trust. This brings new challenges to Requirements Engineering, in particular regarding the understanding of the non-functional requirements behind these new types of systems. To address this issue, we propose the Ontology-based Requirements Engineering (ObRE) method, which aims to systematize the elicitation and analysis of requirements, by using an ontology to conceptually clarify the meaning of a class of requirements, such as privacy, ethicality and trustworthiness. We illustrate the working of ObRE by applying it to a real case study concerning trustworthiness requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is a brief historical account intended to highlight the evolution of ideas and methods in RE. This account is not meant to be exhaustive; we acknowledge the existence of many other high impact RE methods, such as feature-based RE, recent methods based on CANVAS.

  2. 2.

    The complete version of ROTwR in OntoUML and its implementation in OWL is available at https://purl.org/krdb-core/trustworthiness-requirements-ontology.

  3. 3.

    The complete version of ROT in OntoUML and its implementation in OWL are available at http://purl.org/krdb-core/trust-ontology.

  4. 4.

    https://www.bcb.gov.br/en/financialstability/pix_en.

  5. 5.

    https://www.bcb.gov.br/en/financialstability/pixstatistics.

References

  1. Amaral, G., Guizzardi, R., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J.: Ontology-based modeling and analysis of trustworthiness requirements: preliminary results. In: Dobbie, G., Frank, U., Kappel, G., Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER 2020. LNCS, vol. 12400, pp. 342–352. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaral, G., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G., Porello, D.: Towards a reference ontology of trust. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C.A., Meersman, R. (eds.) OTM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11877, pp. 3–21. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Amaral, G., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G., Porello, D.: Ontological foundations for trust management: extending the reference ontology of trust. In: 15th International Workshop on Value Modelling and Business Ontologies (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berto, F., Plebani, M.: Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust Theory: A Socio-cognitive and Computational Model, vol. 18. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, L., Nixon, B., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. International Series in Software Engineering, vol. 5. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5269-7

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dalpiaz, F., Franch, X., Horkoff, J.: iStar 2.0 language guide. arXiv:1605.07767 [cs.SE] (2016). dalp-fran-hork-16-istar.pdf

  9. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Telematica Instituut/CTIT (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Guizzardi, R., et al.: An ontological interpretation of non-functional requirements. In: 8th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, vol. 14, pp. 344–357 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E., Kamal, F.: The role of requirements in the success or failure of software projects. EJ Econjournals 6, 6–7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riegelsberger, J., et al.: The mechanics of trust: a framework for research and design. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 62(3), 381–422 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering - From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, Chichester (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by CAPES (PhD grant# 88881.173022/2018-01) and NeXON project (UNIBZ). The authors would like to thank the Central Bank of Brazil for sharing their experience with the Pix project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenda Amaral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amaral, G., Guizzardi, R., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J. (2021). Trustworthiness Requirements: The Pix Case Study. In: Ghose, A., Horkoff, J., Silva Souza, V.E., Parsons, J., Evermann, J. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13011. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89021-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89022-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics