Abstract
The advent of socio-technical, cyber-physical and artificial intelligence systems has broadened the scope of requirements engineering, which must now deal with new classes of requirements, concerning ethics, privacy and trust. This brings new challenges to Requirements Engineering, in particular regarding the understanding of the non-functional requirements behind these new types of systems. To address this issue, we propose the Ontology-based Requirements Engineering (ObRE) method, which aims to systematize the elicitation and analysis of requirements, by using an ontology to conceptually clarify the meaning of a class of requirements, such as privacy, ethicality and trustworthiness. We illustrate the working of ObRE by applying it to a real case study concerning trustworthiness requirements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is a brief historical account intended to highlight the evolution of ideas and methods in RE. This account is not meant to be exhaustive; we acknowledge the existence of many other high impact RE methods, such as feature-based RE, recent methods based on CANVAS.
- 2.
The complete version of ROTwR in OntoUML and its implementation in OWL is available at https://purl.org/krdb-core/trustworthiness-requirements-ontology.
- 3.
The complete version of ROT in OntoUML and its implementation in OWL are available at http://purl.org/krdb-core/trust-ontology.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Amaral, G., Guizzardi, R., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J.: Ontology-based modeling and analysis of trustworthiness requirements: preliminary results. In: Dobbie, G., Frank, U., Kappel, G., Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER 2020. LNCS, vol. 12400, pp. 342–352. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_25
Amaral, G., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G., Porello, D.: Towards a reference ontology of trust. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C.A., Meersman, R. (eds.) OTM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11877, pp. 3–21. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_1
Amaral, G., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G., Porello, D.: Ontological foundations for trust management: extending the reference ontology of trust. In: 15th International Workshop on Value Modelling and Business Ontologies (2021)
Berto, F., Plebani, M.: Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2015)
Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust Theory: A Socio-cognitive and Computational Model, vol. 18. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)
Chung, L., Nixon, B., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. International Series in Software Engineering, vol. 5. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5269-7
Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2004)
Dalpiaz, F., Franch, X., Horkoff, J.: iStar 2.0 language guide. arXiv:1605.07767 [cs.SE] (2016). dalp-fran-hork-16-istar.pdf
Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Telematica Instituut/CTIT (2005)
Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_27
Guizzardi, R., et al.: An ontological interpretation of non-functional requirements. In: 8th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, vol. 14, pp. 344–357 (2014)
Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E., Kamal, F.: The role of requirements in the success or failure of software projects. EJ Econjournals 6, 6–7 (2016)
Riegelsberger, J., et al.: The mechanics of trust: a framework for research and design. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 62(3), 381–422 (2005)
Van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering - From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, Chichester (2009)
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2008)
Acknowledgments
This work is partially supported by CAPES (PhD grant# 88881.173022/2018-01) and NeXON project (UNIBZ). The authors would like to thank the Central Bank of Brazil for sharing their experience with the Pix project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Amaral, G., Guizzardi, R., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J. (2021). Trustworthiness Requirements: The Pix Case Study. In: Ghose, A., Horkoff, J., Silva Souza, V.E., Parsons, J., Evermann, J. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13011. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89021-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89022-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)