Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education ((GED))

  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

The study explored working-class women’s identities, choices and emotions in relation to higher education through the concept of internal conversation. First, an overview of the participants and universities is provided. Second, the life story approach taken to the research is discussed. Third, the semi-structured interview process is explained. Fourth, feminist interviewing principles and rapport are explored. Fifth, ethical issues are identified and addressed. Finally, the thematic data analysis (Braun & Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101, 2006), and the use of Archer’s (Structure, agency and internal conversation. Cambridge University Press, 2003) inner emotional dialogue to support this theorisation is summarised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human the problem of agency. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and internal conversation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, R., & Sawin, P. (2009). Ethical responsibility in feminist research: Challenging ourselves to do activist research with women in poverty. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(3), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed., pp. 1–41).

    Google Scholar 

  • British Sociological Association (BSA). (2017). Statement of ethical practice (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, W., Murphy, M., & Shields, S. (2014). Research and education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denscombe, M. (2017). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (6th ed.). Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1984). “It’s great to have someone to talk to”: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell & H. Roberts (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70–87). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2012). The managed heart commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, D. (2016). ‘Listening in the cold’: The practice of oral history in an Argentine working-class community. In R. Perks & A. Thomson (Eds.), The oral history reader (3rd ed., pp. 73–92). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2016). The research interview reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1992). Chapter 2: Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passerini, L. (1989). Women’s personal narratives: Myths, experiences and emotions. In The Personal Narratives Group (Ed.), Interpreting women’s lives feminised theory and personal narratives (pp. 189–203). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkett, M., & Roberts, M. (2019). Boys don’t try? Rethinking masculinity in schools. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. (2021, July 19). Transcript review to Sam Shields.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangster, J. (1994). Telling our stories: Feminist debates and the use of oral history. Women’s History Review, 3(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. (2021). Curiosity and careers: Working-class females’ experiences of university. International Studies in the Sociology of Education (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.1959378.

  • Thwaites, R. (2017). (Re) examining the feminist interview: Rapport, gender “matching,” and emotional labour. Frontiers in Sociology, 2, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, G. (1994). Feminisms in education: An introduction. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Shields .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shields, S. (2021). The Study. In: Working Class Female Students' Experiences of Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88935-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88935-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88934-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88935-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics