Abstract
In this chapter, I investigate the imaginary boundary between the actual world and fictional gameworlds by focusing on videogame situations in which this fourth wall is foregrounded or broken. For this purpose, I first define the videogame experience as a self-involving, interactive fiction experience, based on Kendall Walton’s account of fiction (1990). I then describe how, in the current academic discourse on games, it is often claimed that the concept of fourth wall breaks cannot be applied to videogames due to their inherent interactivity. Within game studies, the consensus seems to be that the boundaries between the real and the fictional world are always already blurred in videogame experiences. This chapter instead shows how using interactive, digital technologies to represent fictional worlds does not necessarily complicate the conceptualization of the fourth wall, but rather reveals new ways in which it can be broken. More precisely, this chapter discusses how appreciators of videogames can not only actively participate in fourth wall breaks, but are also uniquely able to initiate these breaks themselves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As discussed before, Walton was convinced that all experiences of fiction involve de se imaginings: an appreciator of a fictional work is always also a participant in the fictional world represented by this work. Even if we do not agree with this thesis, what Walton says is certainly true for interactive fictional media such as videogames. Also, even though Walton indeed did not analyse videogames in Mimesis as Make-Believe, he does mention “interactive fiction for computers” once in this work, in a footnote to his discussion of fourth wall breaks (1990, p. 235).
- 2.
In their chapter in Transgressions in Games and Play, Mortensen and Navarro-Remesal already hint at the possibility of players breaking the fourth wall for other players in multiplayer games. They describe situations in which “the fourth wall is assaulted with direct addresses and in-jokes to break the unity of the ludo-fiction” (2019, p. 37).
- 3.
I do acknowledge that there are extreme cases in which game objects are interacted with while completely disregarding their fictional aspects. Examples of this are so-called game data mining or the reverse engineering of games, in which people look through a game’s code (without even entering the game or its fictional world) or investigate how the game was made to find out what the use and functions of the game’s objects are. Whenever a game’s world is entered from a player perspective, however, there will always be an, albeit very minimal, fictional dimension.
References
Aarseth, E. (2007). Doors and Perception. Fiction vs. Simulation in Games. Intermediality, 9, 35–44.
Aarseth, E. (2014). I Fought the Law: Transgressive Play and the Implied Player. In From Literature to Cultural Literacy (pp. 180–188). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bateman, C. (2011). Imaginary Games. Zero Books.
BioWare. (2011). Mass Effect 2. PlayStation 3: Electronic Arts.
Brown, D. W. (2012). The Suspension of Disbelief in Videogames. PhD thesis. Brunel University School of Arts.
Chalmers, D. J. (2017). The Virtual and the Real. Disputatio, 9(46), 309–352.
Conway, S. (2010). A Circular Wall? Reformulating the Fourth Wall for Videogames. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 2, 145–155.
Currie, G. (1995). Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.
Diderot, D. (1947) [1758]. On Dramatic Poetry. In European Theories of the Drama (B. H. Clark, Trans.). New York: Crown Publishers.
Doctor Kill. (2015). Let’s Play Ocarina of Time Super Wrong. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLctnNKgSZgBzyu07wv3oiiQLNAIxOwuRI
Fox, T. (2015). Undertale. PC: Toby Fox.
FromSoftware. (2019). Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice. PlayStation 4: Activision.
Gualeni, S. (2019). On the De-Familiarizing and Re-ontologizing Effects of Glitches and Glitch-alikes. Proceedings of the 2019 DiGRA International Conference, Kyoto.
Jørgensen, K. (2012). Between the Game System and the Fictional World: A Study of Computer Game Interfaces. Games and Culture, 7(2), 142–163.
Jørgensen, K. (2013). Gameworld Interfaces. MIT Press.
Klevjer, R. (2006). What is the Avatar? Fiction and Embodiment in Avatar-based Singleplayer Computer Games. PhD Thesis. University of Bergen.
Konami Computer Entertainment Japan. (1998). Metal Gear Solid. PlayStation, PC: Konami.
Kubiński, P. (2014). Immersion vs. Emersive Effects in Videogames. In D. Stobbart & M. Evans (Eds.), Play, Theory, and Practice: Engaging with Videogames. Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Lamarque, P. (1981). How Can We Fear and Pity Fictions? The British Journal of Aesthetics, 21(4), 291–304.
Matravers, D. (2014). Fiction and Narrative. Oxford University Press.
McDonnell, N., & Wildman, N. (2019). Virtual Reality: Digital or Fictional? Disputatio, 11(55), 371–397.
Moradi, I. (2004). Glitch Aesthetics. Bachelor Thesis. Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from http://www.oculasm.org/glitch/download/Glitch_dissertation_print_with_pics.pdf
Mortensen, T. E., & Navarro-Remesal, V. (2019). Asynchronous Transgressions: Suffering, Relief, and Invasions in Nintendo’s Miiverse. In K. Jørgensen & F. Karlsen (Eds.), In Transgression in Games and Play (pp. 27–44). Press.
Murray, J. H. (2017). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The Free Press.
Naughty Dog. (2007). Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune. PlayStation 3: Sony Computer Entertainment.
Naughty Dog. (2020). The Last of Us Part II. PlayStation 4: Sony Interactive Entertainment.
Neill, A. (1993). Fiction and the Emotions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30(1), 1–13.
Nintendo EAD. (1998). The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Nintendo 64: Nintendo.
Nintendo EAD. (2001). Animal Crossing. Nintendo 64: Nintendo.
Robson, J., & Meskin, A. (2012). Fiction and Fictional Worlds in Videogames. In J. R. Sageng, H. J. Fossheim, & T. M. Larsen (Eds.), The Philosophy of Computer Games (pp. 201–217). Springer.
Robson, J., & Meskin, A. (2016). Video Games as Self-Involving Interactive Fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74(2), 165–177.
Rocksteady Studios. (2009). Batman: Arkham Asylum. PlayStation 3: Eidos Interactive.
Sageng, J. R. (2012). In-Game Action. In J. R. Sageng, H. J. Fossheim, & T. M. Larsen (Eds.), The Philosophy of Computer Games (pp. 219–232). Springer.
Sega AM3. (1993). Sonic the Hedgehog. Sega System 32: Sega.
Square Enix. (2005). Kingdom Hearts II. PlayStation 2: Square Enix Product Development Division 1.
Tavinor, G. (2005). Videogames and Interactive Fiction. Philosophy and Literature, 29(1), 24–40.
Tavinor, G. (2009). The Art of Videogames. Wiley-Blackwell.
Van de Mosselaer, N. (2018a). How Can We Be Moved to Shoot Zombies? A Paradox of Fictional Emotions and Actions in Interactive Fiction. Journal of Literary Theory, 12(2), 279–299.
Van de Mosselaer, N. (2018b). Fictionally Flipping Tetrominoes? Defining the Fictionality of a Videogame Player’s Actions. Journal of the Philosophy of Games, 1(1). https://journals.uio.no/JPG/article/view/6035
Walton, K. (1978a). Fearing Fictions. The Journal of Philosophy, 75(1), 5–27.
Walton, K. (1978b). How Remote are Fictional Worlds from the Real World? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 37(1), 11–23.
Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Harvard University Press.
Waszkiewicz, A. (2020). Together They Are Twofold’: Player-Avatar Relationship Beyond the Fourth Wall. Journal of Games Criticism, 4(1). http://gamescriticism.org/articles/waszkiewicz-4-1
Weise, M. (2008). Press the ‘Action’ Button, Snake! The Art of Self-Reference in Video Games. Game Career Guide 25. https://gamecareerguide.com/features/652/press_the_action_button_snake_.php?page=1
Whalen, A. (2019). ‘Sekiro’ Flying Guide: How to Swim Through the Air With ‘Shadows Die Twice’ Glitch. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/sekiro-flying-guide-glitch-shadows-die-twice-game-1392259
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van de Mosselaer, N. (2022). Breaking the Fourth Wall in Videogames. In: Terrone, E., Tripodi, V. (eds) Being and Value in Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88793-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88793-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88792-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88793-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)