Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teachers-in-Training and the Policing of Language Variation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Policies and the Politics of Language Practices

Part of the book series: Language Policy ((LAPO,volume 28))

Abstract

In the domains of education and labor, we may expect to be assessed on competences and capacities. Alas, stereotyping and prejudice hinder this for people from peripheral areas and marginalized groups. One of the important factors in this is their language. Why does speaking with an accent diminish one’s opportunities in the job market or the achievements in one’s school career? Why are some accents better than other accents?

In a pilot study at a teacher training college we addressed the question if future teachers of Dutch may or may not speak with an accent in the class room. Apparently, speaking with an accent will be tolerated by future teachers of Dutch, but it depends on which accent one uses. Indigenous accents are evaluated more positively than foreign accents, especially those we associate with labor migration.

Although diversity in the pronunciation of Dutch may have increased, the social acceptance of accents is quite selective. Adolescents have to deal with stigmatized representations when people hear and assess their accents. Tolerance towards speaking with an accent is limited, and this may damage the position of young people from the countryside and specific ethnic groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2012). Verbal hygiene. (2nd edn; first published 1995). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. www.coe.int/lang-cefr

  • Delarue, S., & Ghyselen, A.-S. (2016). Setting the standard: Are teachers better speakers of standard Dutch? Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 34–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, M., van Meurs, F., Planken, B., & Korzilius, H. (2016). A reconsideration of the status of English in the Netherlands within the Kachruvian three circles model. World Englishes, 35(3), 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grijp, L. (2007). Singing in Dutch dialects: Language choice in music and the dialect renaissance. In P. Margry & H. Roodenburg (Eds.), Reframing Dutch culture. Between otherness and authenticity (pp. 225–243). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, F. (2003). Language policy evaluation and the European charter for regional or minority languages. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, J. (2009). Inleiding. In J. Jaspers (Ed.), De klank van de stad. Stedelijke meertaligheid en interculturele communicatie (pp. 7–32). Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, J. (2012). Het algemeen Nederlands: uw sociale zekerheid? In K. Absilis, J. Jaspers, & S. van Hoof (Eds.), De Manke Usurpator. Over Verkavelingsvlaams (pp. 371–399). Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, J., & Madsen, L. M. (Eds). (2016). Sociolinguistics in a languagised world. Applied Linguistics Review (special issue) 7(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloss, H. (1997). The American bilingual tradition. Newbury House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontra, M. (2006). Sustainable linguicism. In F. Hinskens (Ed.), Language variation – European perspectives (pp. 97–126). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, S., & Sturm, J. (1994). Das nationale Selbstverständnis im Unterricht der Nationalsprache: Der Fall der Niederlande. In I. Gogolin (Ed.), Das nationale Selbstverständnis der Bildung (pp. 151–182). Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, S., & Vallen, T. (2009). Discoursen over dialect en school. In J. Jaspers (Ed.), De klank van de stad. Stedelijke meertaligheid en interculturele communicatie (pp. 165–181). Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A. (2003). Language rights and political theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Rojo, L. (2017). Language and power. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 77–102). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1991). Authority in language. In Investigating standard English. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugglestone, L. (2003). Talking proper: The rise of accent as social symbol. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, J. (2004). A parametrized view of the concept of ‘correctness’. Multilingua, 23, 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ó Riagáin, D. (1999). The importance of linguistic rights for speakers of lesser used languages. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 6, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinget, A.-F., Rotteveel, M., & Van de Velde, H. (2014). Standaardnederlands met een accent. Herkenning en evaluatie van regionaal gekleurd Standaardnederlands in Nederland. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 19(1), 3–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poelmans, P., Kerkhoff, A., & Swanenberg, J. (2016). ‘In de pauze mag het wel’. Hoe denken aankomende leraren en leerlingen over accenten in de klas? Paper presented at Taal en Tongval-colloquium, Ghent 25 November 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, D. (2011). Methods in (applied) folk linguistics: Getting into the minds of the folk. AILA Review, 24, 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K., & Kroskrity, P. (1998). Language ideologies. In Practice and theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1988). Multilingualism and the education of minority children. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & J. Cummins (Eds.), Minority education: From shame to struggle (pp. 9–44). Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smakman, D. (2006). Standard Dutch in the Netherlands. A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Description. PhD dissertation, Radboud University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotti, M. (2011). Ideologies of success for superdiverse citizens: The Dutch testing regime for integration and the online private sector. Diversities, 13(2), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. (2003). Waar gaat het Nederlands naar toe? Panorama van een taal. Bert Bakker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanenberg, J. (2012). Language variation as a nuisance. How to deal with ‘mistakes’ in the classroom. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 37, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanenberg, J. (2014). All dialects are equal, but some dialects are more equal than others. Fairness and policies on regional languages. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 5, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taalunie. (2019). Visie op taalvariatie en taalvariatiebeleid. Visietekst van de Adviescommissie Taalvariatie in opdracht van het Algemeen Secretariaat van de Taalunie. Retrieved July 3, 2019, from http://taalunieversum.org/sites/tuv/files/downloads/Visietekst%20taalvariatie%20-%20februari%202019.pdf

  • Thissen, L. (2018). Talking in and out of place. Ethnographic reflections on language, place, and (un)belonging in Limburg, the Netherlands. Unpublished Dissertation, Maastricht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Horst, J. (2008). Het einde van de standaardtaal; een wisseling van Europese taalcultuur. Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Weerd, P. (2019). “Those foreigners ruin everything here”: Interactional functions of ethnic labelling among pupils in the Netherlands. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 23(3), 244–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. (2008). Language and identity choice in Catalonia: The interplay of contrasting ideologies of linguistic authority. In K. Süselbeck, U. Mühlschlegel, & P. Masson (Eds.), Lengua, nación e identidad. La regulación del plurilingüismo en España y América Latina (pp. 303–323). Vervuert/Iberoamericana.

    Google Scholar 

News Items on Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Culture Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Jos Swanenberg

  2. Teacher Training, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Anne Kerkhoff & Petra Poelmans

Authors
  1. Jos Swanenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Kerkhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Petra Poelmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jos Swanenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Culture Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Massimiliano Spotti

  2. Department of Culture Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Jos Swanenberg

  3. Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Jan Blommaert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Swanenberg, J., Kerkhoff, A., Poelmans, P. (2021). Teachers-in-Training and the Policing of Language Variation. In: Spotti, M., Swanenberg, J., Blommaert, J. (eds) Language Policies and the Politics of Language Practices. Language Policy, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88723-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88723-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88722-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88723-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation