In synchronous hybrid teaching, students in different locations, some on-site and others online, engage in learning in a shared learning space. This chapter uncovers the challenges and opportunities associated with this specific hybrid learning space design. By reviewing previous studies in the field and introducing an analytical approach based on the design concepts presented by Goodyear and Carvalho in their ACAD framework, the chapter contributes to the formulation of principles for supporting activity-centred learning design principles and guidelines for network learning in a post-pandemic future.
- Hybrid learning spaces
- Blended synchronous teaching
- Post-pandemic teaching
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Abdelmalak, M. M. M., & Parra, J. L. (2016). Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 6(4), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2016100102
Amarin, N. Z. (2020). The art of teaching in fusion classroom learning situations. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14 (11). https://www.ijicc.net/index.php/volume-14-2020/214-vol-14-iss-11
Angelone, L., Warner, Z., & Zydney, J. M. (2020). Optimizing the technological design of a blended synchronous learning environment. Online Learning, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2180
Anson, I. G. (2015). Assessment feedback using screencapture technology in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(4), 375–390.
Bell, J., Sawaya, S., & Cain, W. (2014). Synchromodal classes: designing for shared learning experiences between face-to-face and online students. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v5i1.12657
Blad, E. (2020). An Idaho school reopens. Are its precautions the ‘New Normal’? Education Week - Politics K-12, May 4. https://www.edweek.org/education/an-idaho-school-reopens-are-its-precautions-the-new-normal/2020/05
Binnewies, S., & Wang, Z. (2019). Challenges of student equity and engagement in a HyFlex course. In C. N. Allan, C. Campbell, & J. Crough (Eds.), Blended learning designs in STEM higher education (pp. 209–230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7_12
Bonk, C. J. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: Synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? Distance Education, 41(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821610
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2016). A mixed methods study of graduate students’ self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks.
Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Performativity of materials in learning: The learning-whole in action. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.627
Chemi, T. (2020). It is impossible: The Teacher’s creative response to the Covid-19 emergency and digitalized teaching strategies. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420960141
Chen, B., Zydney, J., & Patton, K. (2017). Creating a community of inquiry in large-enrollment online courses: An exploratory study on the effect of protocols within online discussions. Online Learning, 21(1).
Christensen, O., & Hansen, M. N. (2020). Dialog i skolen—Et review af litteratur om dialogisk uddannelse, pædagogik og undervisning. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35731.30248.
Cook, J., Mor, Y., & Santos, P. (2020). Three cases of hybridity in learning spaces: Towards a design for a zone of possibility. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12945
Davidsen, J., & Vanderlinde, R. (2014). Researchers and teachers learning together and from each other using video-based multimodal analysis: Researchers and teachers learning together. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12141
de Magnus, D. M., Carbonera, L. F. B., Pfitscher, L. L., Farret, F. A., Bernardon, D. P., & Tavares, A. A. (2020). An educational laboratory approach for hybrid project-based learning of synchronous machine stability and control: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2956909
Eyal, L., & Gil, E. (2022). Hybrid learning spaces–A three-fold evolving perspective. In E. Gil, Y. Mor, Y. Dimitriadis, & C. Köppe (Eds.), Hybrid learning spaces. Springer.
Flynn-Wilson, L., & Reynolds, K. E. (2020). Student responses to virtual synchronous, hybrid, and face-to-face teaching/learning. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.43
Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
Goodyear, P. (2020). D esign and co-configuration for hybrid learning: Theorising the practices of learning space design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12925
Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Activity-centred analysis and Design (ACAD): Core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09926-7
Green, J. K., Burrow, M. S., & Carvalho, L. (2020). Designing for transition: supporting teachers and students cope with emergency remote education. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00185-6
Hod, Y., & Katz, S. (2020). Fostering highly engaged knowledge building communities in socioemotional and sociocognitive hybrid learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1117–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12910
Holm Sørensen, B., & Tweddell Levinsen, K. (2019). Den hybride skole: Læring og didaktisk design, når det digitale er allestedsnærværende. Klim.
Kepler, T. (2020, December 8). Gymnasielærerne kritiserer centerchef: Glorificering af e-læring er farligt. Altinget. https://www.altinget.dk/uddannelse/artikel/gymnasielaererne-kritiserer-centerchef-glorificering-af-e-laering-er-farligt
Kohls, C. (2019). Hybrid learning spaces for design thinking. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0017
Konnerup, U., Ryberg, T., & Sørensen, M. T. (2019). Designs for learning as springboards for professional development in higher education. In A. Littlejohn, J. Jaldemark, E. Vrieling-Teunter, & F. Nijland (Eds.), Networked professional learning (pp. 111–127). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18030-0_7
Lakhal, S., Bateman, D., & Bédard, J. (2017). Blended synchronous delivery modes in graduate programs: A literature review and how it is implemented in the master teacher program. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747
Little, P., & Jones, B. (2020). A comparison of student performance in face to face classes versus online classes versus hybrid classes using open educational resources. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 2020(24). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1263878
Liu, H., Spector, J. M., & Ikle, M. (2018). Computer technologies for model-based collaborative learning: A research-based approach with initial findings. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22049
Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. Routledge.
Luckin, R. (Ed.). (2018). Enhancing learning and teaching with technology: What the research says. UCL Institute of Education Press.
Maxwell, L. A. (2020). Reopening schools: Here are some districts’ plans for the fall. Education Week, July 13. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/reopening-schools-here-are-some-districts-plans-for-the-fall/2020/07
Munger, M. H., Campbell, B., & Banister, S. (2014). Technology boot camp: Providing professional development for faculty and supporting active learning environments for students. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2014, pp. 789–793. http://www.editlib.org/p/130855/proceeding_130855.pdf
Nielsen, F. (2013). Global Classroom—Videokonference i undervisning. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 6(11). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v6i11.8814
Nørgård, R. T., & Hilli, C. (2022). Hyper-Hybrid Learning Spaces in Higher Education. In E. Gil, Y. Mor, Y. Dimitriadis, & C. Köppe (Eds.), Hybrid learning spaces. Springer.
Ørngreen. (2015). Reflections on design-based research: In online educational and competence development projects. In J. Abdelnour Nocera, B. R. Barricelli, A. Lopes, P. Campos, & T. Clemmensen (Eds.), Human work interaction design. Work analysis and interaction design methods for pervasive and smart workplaces (Vol. 468, pp. 20–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7_2
Ørngreen, Levinsen, K., Jelsbak, V., Bendsen, T., & Møller, K. (2013). Live videotransmitteret undervisning. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier (LOM), 6(11). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v6i11.8565
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Rambøll. (2020). Undersøgelse af online undervisning og eksamen forår 2020. Aarhus Universitet. https://newsroom.au.dk/fileadmin/Artikler/AU_Kommunikation-Medier/Kommunikation/Undersoegelse_af_online_undervisning_og_eksamen_foraar_2020_191020.pdf
Romero-Hall, E., & Rocha Vicentini, C. (2017). Examining distance learners in hybrid synchronous instruction: Successes and challenges. Online Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1258
Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2021). Facilitating emergency remote K-12 teaching in computing-enhanced virtual learning environments during COVID-19 pandemic—Blessing or curse? Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121992781
Smith, J., Schreder, K., & Porter, L. (2020). Are they paying attention, or are they shoe-shopping? Evidence from online learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 5(1), 200–209.
Stommel, J. (2012). Hybridity, pt. 2: What is hybrid pedagogy? 2012. https://hybridpedagogy.org/hybridity-pt-2-what-is-hybrid-pedagogy/
Superville, D. R. (2020). Hybrid school schedules: More flexibility; big logistical challenges. Education Week, June 30. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/hybrid-school-schedules-more-flexibility-big-logistical-challenges/2020/06
Szeto, E. (2014). A comparison of online/face-to-face students’ and Instructor’s experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4250–4254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.926
Wang, Qingqi, & Rasmussen, A. (2020). CO-VID-EO: Resilient hybrid learning strategies to explicitly teach team skills in undergraduate students. [Preprint]. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159526771.13374879
Wang, Q., Quek, C. L., & Hu, X. (2017). designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment: An educational design research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034
Wiederhold, B. K. (2020). Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Avoiding “zoom fatigue”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 23(7), 437–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkw
Yang, X., Li, D., Liu, X., & Tan, J. (2020). Learner behaviors in synchronous online prosthodontic education during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, S0022391320304315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.004
Yeoman, P., & Wilson, S. (2019). Designing for situated learning: Understanding the relations between material properties, designed form and emergent learning activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2090–2108. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12856
Zydney, J. M., McKimmy, P., Lindberg, R., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Here or there instruction: Lessons learned in implementing innovative approaches to blended synchronous learning. TechTrends, 63(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z
Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678
Editors and Affiliations
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bülow, M.W. (2022). Designing Synchronous Hybrid Learning Spaces: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Gil, E., Mor, Y., Dimitriadis, Y., Köppe, C. (eds) Hybrid Learning Spaces. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88520-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88519-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88520-5