Skip to main content

The Dark Side of Individualization at Work: Idiosyncratic Deal Exploitation and the Creation of Elite Workers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Idiosyncratic Deals at Work

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to critically analyse the taken-for-granted assumptions underpinning the notion of idiosyncratic deals (or i-deals). This chapter argues that i-deals promote individualized arrangements at work which are likely to create precarity, inequality, competition and alienation among workers. We look more closely at the operationality of i-deals, their underlying mechanisms and role in subjecting individuals to labour processes that (re)produce individuality, power-relations and dominance. In so doing, we employ the works of the French philosopher, Michel Foucault, to explore the implications of promoting individuality at work. By positioning individualized work arrangements as modes of neoliberal governmentality  and a consequence of individualization of society, our chapter should be read as a critique of i-deals which produce  discourses that portray the individual as agile and less recalcitrant. In what follows, we discuss how neoliberalism serves to individualize work and exert control over the labour processes by means of individuation and individualization. This is followed by our quest to reinstate and situate subjectivity in the backdrop of literature on work and organizational psychology. Once subjectivity is reinstated, we discuss the possibility of idiosyncratic exploitation of individuals and the creation of elite workers through processes of othering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Robertson, M. (2006). The best and the brightest: The construction, significance and effects of elite identities in consulting firms. Organization, 13(2), 195–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., Hu, J., Liden, R. C., & Vidyarthi, P. R. (2011). Leader-member exchange: Recent research findings and prospects for the future. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 311–325). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., Hu, J., Vidyarthi, P., & Liden, R. C. (2018). Leader-member exchange as a linking pin in the idiosyncratic deals-Performance relationship in workgroups. Leadership Quarterly, 29(6), 698–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2010). Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: Idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 970–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bal, M., & Lub, X. D. (2015). Individualization of work arrangements. In M. Bal & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Idiosyncratic deals between employees and organizations: Conceptual issues, applications and the role of co-workers (pp. 9–23). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bal, P. M., & Dóci, E. (2018). Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 536–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballout, H. I. (2007). Career success: The effects of human capital, person-environment fit and organizational support. Journal of Managerial Psychology., 22(8), 741–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2009). Losing the traditional: Individualization and ‘precarious freedoms.’ In A. Elliott & P. du Gay (Eds.), Identity in question (pp. 13–36). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Social exchange theory. Retrieved September, 3(2007), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowring, F. (2002). Post-Fordism and the end of work. Futures, 34(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewis, J. (2005). Othering organization theory: Marta Calás and Linda Smircich. Sociological review, 53 (1_suppl), 80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Heller, D., & Keeping, L. M. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzykcy, A. Z., Boehm, S. A., & Baldridge, D. C. (2019). Fostering sustainable careers across the lifespan: The role of disability, idiosyncratic deals and perceived work ability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1982). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1990). The politics of production (p. 193). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, B. (2009). Flexicurity as a moderator of the relationship between job insecurity and psychological well-being. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(3), 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. S., Farh, J., Chang, H., & Hsu, W. (2002). Guanxi, zhongcheng, competence and managerial behavior in Chinese context. Journal of Chinese Psychology, 44(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., & Sun, F. (2011). Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costea, B., Amiridis, K., & Crump, N. (2012). Graduate employability and the principle of potentiality: An aspect of the ethics of HRM. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, N., & Dundon, T. (2006). The psychological contract: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. (2001). Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (2003). The employment relationship and the field of industrial relations. Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, 2, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J., Mieg, H. A., & Felt, U. (2006). Professionalization, scientific expertise, and elitism: A sociological perspective. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A .M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 105–123). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, H. S., & Western, B. (2001). Accounting for the decline of unions in the private sector, 1973–1998. Journal of Labor Research, 22(3), 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973). Wahnsinn und Gesellschaft: Eine Geschichte des Wahns im Zeitalter der Vernunft. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller Et Punir. Paris, 1, 192–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978 [1980]). The eye of power. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, In Colin Gordon et al. (Ed., Trans.) (pp. 146–165).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings by Michel Foucault, 1972–77. In C. Gordon (Ed.). Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory and Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2003). From discipline to flexibilization? Rereading Foucault in the shadow of globalization. Constellations, 10(2), 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gane, N. (2012). The governmentalities of neoliberalism: Panopticism, post-panopticism and beyond. Sociological Review, 60(4), 611–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A., & Heath, L. E. (1976). Rational choice and social exchange: A critique of exchange theory. CUP Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herod, A., & Lambert, R. (2016). Neoliberalism, precarious work and remaking the geography of global capitalism. In R. Lambert & A. Herod (Eds.), Neoliberal capitalism and precarious work (pp. 1–42). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick, W. P., & Boje, D. M. (1992). Organization and the body: Post-Fordist dimensions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(1), 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, V. T., & Tekleab, A. G. (2016). A model of idiosyncratic deal-making and attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), 642–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., & Glaser, J. (2008). Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, E. (2019). Becoming a Neoliberal Subject. Ephemera, 19(3), 615–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: Alternative perspectives on economic and political change? Economy and Society, 24(3), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., Bottorff, J. L., Browne, A. J., Grewal, S., Hilton, B. A., & Clarke, H. (2004). Othering and being othered in the context of health care services. Health Communication, 16(2), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. (1990). Subjectivity, power and the labour process. In D. Knights & H. Willmott (Eds.), Labour process theory (pp. 297–335). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Collinson, D. (1987). Disciplining the shopfloor: A comparison of the disciplinary effects of managerial psychology and financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(5), 457–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & McCabe, D. (2000). Ain’t misbehavin’? Opportunities for resistance under new forms of quality’ management. Sociology, 34(3), 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12(2), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23(4), 535–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (1990). Labour Process Theory. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, D. T., Ho, V. T., & Garg, S. (2020). Employee and coworker idiosyncratic deals: Implications for emotional exhaustion and deviant behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, K. M. (2016). The rise of the “Gig Economy” and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., & Ambrose, M. L. (1992). Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 212–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, L., Rousseau, D. M., & Chang, K. T. T. (2009). Idiosyncratic deals: Coworkers as interested third parties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Las Heras, M., Rofcanin, Y., Matthijs Bal, P., & Stollberger, J. (2017). How do flexibility i-deals relate to work performance? Exploring the roles of family performance and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1280–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C., Wayne, S. J., & Rousseau, D. M. (2016). Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S9–S29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T., & Berger, P. (1964). Social mobility and personal identity. European Journal of Sociology/archives Européennes De Sociologie/europäisches Archiv Für Soziologie, 5(2), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marescaux, E., De Winne, S., & Rofcanin, Y. (2021). Co-worker reactions to i-deals through the lens of social comparison: The role of fairness and emotions. Human Relations, 74(3), 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marescaux, E., De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2019). Idiosyncratic deals from a distributive justice perspective: Examining co-workers’ voice behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (2007). Individualization at work? Subjectivity, team working and anti-unionism. Organization, 14(2), 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, T. (1995). Barriers to women’s career success: Human capital, career choices, structural determinants, or simply sex discrimination. Applied Psychology, 44(4), 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2013). Riding the waves of change. Imaginization Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neirotti, P. (2020). Work intensification and employee involvement in lean production: New light on a classic dilemma. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(15), 1958–1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, T. (1998). Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian studies? Organization Studies, 19(3), 415–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Idiosyncratic deals and voice behavior. Journal of Management, 41(3), 893–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, D., & Willmott, H. (2001). Debating labour process theory: The issue of subjectivity and the relevance of poststructuralism. Sociology, 35(2), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pereboom, D. (2006). Living without free will. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., & Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on chaos: Handbook for a management revolution (p. 561). Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffnsøe, S., Gudmand-Høyer, M., & Thaning, M. S. (2016). Foucault’s dispositive: The perspicacity of dispositive analytics in organizational research. Organization, 23(2), 272–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. I. (2018). Elites, professions, and the neoliberal state: Critical points of intersection and contention. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(3), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud, E. (1983). Holy virility: The social construction of masculinity. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. E. (1978). Neoclassicism, marxism, and collective action. Journal of Economic Issues, 12(1), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., Bal, M., van der Heijden, B., & Erdogan, D. (2018). A trickle-down model of task and developmental I-deals. Human Relations, 71(11), 1508–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rofcanin, Y., Kiefer, T., & Strauss, K. (2017). What seals the I-deal? Exploring the role of employees’ behaviours and managers’ emotions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., Slater, D. J., Chang, C. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2013). Let’s make a deal: Development and validation of the ex post i-deals scale. Journal of Management, 39(3), 709–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. (2001). Flexibility versus fairness? Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (2005). I-Deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. M.E. Sharpe. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Hornung, S., & Kim, T. G. (2009). Idiosyncratic deals: Testing propositions on timing, content, and the employment relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 338–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, M., Holden, D., Schrock, D., Godwin, S., Thompson, S., & Wolkomir, M. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79(2), 419–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). Rational choice theory. Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present, 129, 671–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacek, T. (2011). Economics of good and evil: The quest for economic meaning from Gilgamesh to Wall Street. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). Someone to watch over me’: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2), 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D. (2013). Foucault, subjectivity and ethics: Towards a self-forming subject. Organization, 20(6), 904–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. G. (2017). The micro-foundations of international relations theory: Psychology and behavioral economics. International Organization, 71, (S1_Suppl.), S249–S263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1985). The means of management control. Sociology, 19(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. (2008). Economic common sense and the depoliticization of the economic. Political Research Quarterly, 61(1), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., & Smith, C. (2000). Follow the redbrick road: Reflections on pathways in and out of the labor process debate. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(4), 40–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B. (1998). Beyond good and evil: Depth and division in the management of human resources. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organization theory (pp. 191–210). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2015). Classificatory struggles: Class, culture and inequality in neoliberal times. The Sociological Review, 63(2), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidyarthi, P. R., Singh, S., Erdogan, B., Chaudhry, A., Posthuma, R., & Anand, S. (2016). Individual deals within teams: Investigating the role of relative i-deals for employee performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y. Y., & Wu, L. Z. (2010). Political skill, supervisor-subordinate guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, R., & Loacker, B. (2006). Snake’s coils are even more intricate than a mole’s burrow: Individualisation and subjectification in post-disciplinary regimes of work. Management Revue, 17(4), 395–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 515–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, R. D. (1992). Talking the post‐fordist talk... but Walking the post‐industrial walk. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(2), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farooq Mughal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mughal, F., Wang, S., Zafar, A. (2022). The Dark Side of Individualization at Work: Idiosyncratic Deal Exploitation and the Creation of Elite Workers. In: Anand, S., Rofcanin, Y. (eds) Idiosyncratic Deals at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88516-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics