Skip to main content

Success and Hindrance Factors of AHA-Oriented Open Service Platforms

Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS,volume 1463)


In the past years, there has been a flourishing of platforms dedicated to Active Assisted Living (AAL) and Active and Healthy Ageing (AHA). Most of them feature as their core elements intelligent systems for the analysis of multisource and multimodal data coming from sensors of various nature inserted in suitable IoT ecosystems. While progress in signal processing and artificial intelligence has shown how these platforms may have a great potential in improving the daylife of seniors or frail subjects, there are still several technological and non-technological barriers that should be torn down before full uptake of the existing solutions. In this paper, we address specifically this issue describing the outcome and creation process of a methodology aimed at evaluating the successful uptake of existing platforms in the field of AHA. We propose a pathway (as part of an overarching methodology) to define and select for Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), taking into account an extensive amount of parameters related to success, uptake and evolution of platforms. For this, we contribute a detailed analysis structured along with the 4 main actions of mapping, observing, understanding, and defining. Our analysis focuses on Platforms, defined as operating environments, under which various applications, agents and intelligent services are designed, implemented, tested, released and maintained. By following the proposed pathway, we were able to define a practical and effective methodology for monitoring and evaluating the uptake and other success indicators of AHA platforms. Besides, by the same token, we were able to provide guidelines and best practices for the development of the next-generation platforms in the AHA domain.


  • AAL
  • AHA
  • Open service platforms
  • KPI Analysis
  • Data analysis

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88113-9_53
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-88113-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.


  1. Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, R., Vaupel, J.W.: Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 374(9696), 1196–1208 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciasullo, M., Cosimato, S., Storlazzi, A., Douglas, A.: Health care ecosystem: some evidence from the international consortium for health outcomes measurement (ichom) international conference on quality and service sciences (icqss). In: 19th Toulon-Verona International Conference Excellence in Services (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colantonio, S., et al.: An intelligent and integrated platform for supporting the management of chronic heart failure patients. In: 2008 Computers in Cardiology, pp. 897–900. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colantonio, S., et al.: Semeoticons-reading the face code of cardio-metabolic risk. In: 2015 International Workshop on Computational Intelligence for Multimedia Understanding (IWCIM), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Digital Health Europe: Online catalog - digital health Europe (2020).

  6. EHealth Hub: Ehealth hub platform (2020).

  7. Eivazzadeh, S., Berglund, J.S., Larsson, T.C., Fiedler, M., Anderberg, P.: Most influential qualities in creating satisfaction among the users of health information systems: study in seven European union countries. JMIR Med. Inform. 6(4), e11252 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Union: Top 25 influential ICT for active and healthy ageing projects (2020).

  9. Eurostat: Ageing Europe: Looking at the lives of older people in the EU, 2019 edition. eurostat (2019).

  10. Fazio, M., Celesti, A., Marquez, F.G., Glikson, A., Villari, M.: Exploiting the fiware cloud platform to develop a remote patient monitoring system. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC), pp. 264–270. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fernández, M.L.: Definición y diferencias de kpi y métricas (2020).

  12. Fico, G., et al.: Co-creating with consumers and stakeholders to understand the benefit of Internet of Things in Smart Living Environments for Ageing Well: the approach adopted in the Madrid Deployment Site of the ACTIVAGE Large Scale Pilot. In: EMBEC/NBC -2017. IP, vol. 65, pp. 1089–1092. Springer, Singapore (2018).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Georgiou, K., Larentzakis, A.V., Khamis, N.N., Alsuhaibani, G.I., Alaska, Y.A., Giallafos, E.J.: Can wearable devices accurately measure heart rate variability? A systematic review. Folia Med. 60(1), 7–20 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanke, S., et al: universaal-an open and consolidated AAL platform. In: Ambient assisted living, pp. 127–140. Springer, Cham (2011).

  15. Henriquez, P., et al.: Mirror mirror on the wall an unobtrusive intelligent multisensory mirror for well-being status self-assessment and visualization. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 19(7), 1467–1481 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, A.H., et al.: Developing a standard set of patient-centred outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease–an international, cross-disciplinary consensus. J. Crohn’s Colitis 12(4), 408–418 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O.P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(1), 7–15 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Marr, B.: Key Performance Indicators (KPI): The 75 measures every manager needs to know. Pearson UK (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marr, B.: 25 Need-to-know Key Performance Indicators. Pearson UK (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mubashir, M., Shao, L., Seed, L.: A survey on fall detection: principles and approaches. Neurocomputing 100, 144–152 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Nijagal, M.A., et al.: Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal. BMC Health Serv. Res. 18(1), 1–12 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Rockart, J.F.: Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Busin. Rev. 57(2), 81–93 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sopact: A guide for selecting monitoring and evaluation tools (2019).

  24. Torrenegra, A.: The best website kpi’s for three different website types (2019).

  25. Torrenegra, A.: Indicadores: performance indicators for online platforms (a template) (2020).

Download references


The work developed under this article was co-funded by the project, under the European Union’s Horizon H2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Grant Agreement n.875452.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Moroni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carboni, A. et al. (2021). Success and Hindrance Factors of AHA-Oriented Open Service Platforms. In: Wojtkiewicz, K., Treur, J., Pimenidis, E., Maleszka, M. (eds) Advances in Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1463. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88112-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88113-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)