Abstract
We investigate an iterative deliberation process for an agent community wishing to make a joint decision. We develop a general model consisting of a community of n agents, each with their initial ideal point in some metric space (X, d), such that in each iteration of the iterative deliberation process, all agents move slightly closer to the current winner, according to some voting rule \(\mathcal {R}\). For several natural metric spaces and suitable voting rules for them, we identify conditions under which such an iterative deliberation process is guaranteed to converge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Indeed, the result of such deliberation may be the opposite – that the right-winger would be radicalized; we do not focus on such cases, but mention them in Sect. 8.
- 2.
Indeed, for some sparse spaces these two constraints may not be always satisfiable, as agents moving towards the current winner may need to jump “too far”. In the metric spaces we consider in this paper there is always at least a specific \(\epsilon \) for which these constraints are indeed satisfiable.
- 3.
We use “T” and not the standard “d”, as “d” is taken by the metric space (X, d).
References
Arrow, K.: Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Austen-Smith, D., Feddersen, T.: Deliberation and voting rules. In: Austen-Smith, D., Duggan, J. (eds.) Social Choice and Strategic Decisions. SCW, pp. 269–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27295-X_11
Austen-Smith, D., Feddersen, T.J.: Deliberation, preference uncertainty, and voting rules. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 209–217 (2006)
Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Procaccia, A.D., Lang, J.: Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Bulteau, L., Shahaf, G., Shapiro, E., Talmon, N.: Aggregation over metric spaces: proposing and voting in elections, budgeting, and legislation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 70, 1413–1439 (2021)
Cohen, J., Bohman, J., Rehg, W.: Deliberation and democratic legitimacy, 1997, pp. 67–92 (1989)
Elkind, E., Grossi, D., Shapiro, E., Talmon, N.: United for change: deliberative coalition formation to change the status quo. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2021, vol. 35, pp. 5339–5346 (2021)
Fain, B., Goel, A., Munagala, K., Sakshuwong, S.: Sequential deliberation for social choice. In: Devanur, N.R., Lu, P. (eds.) WINE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10660, pp. 177–190. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_13
Faliszewski, P., Gonen, R., Kouteckỳ, M., Talmon, N.: Opinion diffusion and campaigning on society graphs. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2018, pp. 219–225 (2018)
Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A., Szufa, S., Talmon, N.: How similar are two elections? In: Proceedings of AAAI 2019, vol. 33, pp. 1909–1916 (2019)
Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A., Szufa, S., Talmon, N.: Isomorphic distances among elections. In: Proceedings of CSR 2020, pp. 64–78 (2020)
Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A., Talmon, N.: Multiwinner voting: a new challenge for social choice theory. Trends Comput. Soc. Choice 74, 27–47 (2017)
Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A., Talmon, N.: Multiwinner rules with variable number of winners. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2020 (2020)
Garg, N., Kamble, V., Goel, A., Marn, D., Munagala, K.: Iterative local voting for collective decision-making in continuous spaces. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 64, 315–355 (2019)
Grandi, U.: Social choice and social networks. Trends Comput. Soc. Choice, 169–184 (2017)
Hogrebe, T.: Complexity of distances in elections: doctoral consortium. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2019, pp. 2414–2416 (2019)
Lang, J., Xia, L.: Voting in combinatorial domains. In: Handbook of Computational Social Choice, pp. 197–222. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Lizzeri, A., Yariv, L.: Sequential deliberation (2010). SSRN 1702940
Meir, R.: Iterative voting. Trends in Comput. Soc. Choice, 69–86 (2017)
Acknowledgments
Nimrod Talmon and Eyal Leizerovich were supported by the Israel Science Foundation (ISF; Grant No. 630/19).
Most importantly, we thank the Hoodska Explosive for years of fun.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zvi, G.B., Leizerovich, E., Talmon, N. (2021). Iterative Deliberation via Metric Aggregation. In: Fotakis, D., Ríos Insua, D. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87756-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87756-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87755-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87756-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)