Skip to main content

Experimenting Human Resource Design in Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Resource Design

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

  • 397 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter includes the participatory action research carried out to frame and test the Human Resource Design framework or parts of it. You will first find the scheme through which each project is showcased. Some of the categories reflect the variables emerged during the preliminary research phase and used for the observational studies (Sect. 2.2). Then, each paragraph contains the story of one project and the elements of the framework that have been formulated or tested for the project itself. At the end of the chapter, you can find all the lessons learnt from the projects that led to the final configuration of the framework, presented in the next chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auricchio V, Rossi M, Dezza G, Peretti Griva P (2018) Service design and human resource consulting: an integrated vision. In: Proceedings of the service design and innovation conference, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman SL, Barry M (2007) Innovation as a learning process: embedding design thinking. Calif Manage Rev 50(1):25–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ST, Villado AJ, Lukasik MA, Belau L, Briggs AL (2011) Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: a meta-analysis. J Manag 37:709–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeable (2017) Designing behaviour change toolkit—a guide to using behavioural economics with service design (s.d.). Retrieved from https://toolkit.bridgeable.com/

  • Bryson J (1995) Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations (rev. edn). Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, CA. Latest edition strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (Bryson on Strategic Planning)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper-Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Isaacs D, the World Cafe Community (2005) The world cafe: shaping our futures through conversations that matter. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A (1998) The Inmates are running the Asylum, Sams

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono E (1985) Six thinking hats: an essential approach to business management. Little, Brown, & Company. ISBN 0-316-17791-1 (hardback) and 0316178314 (paperback)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deserti A, Rizzo F (2014) Design and the cultures of enterprises. Des Issues 30(1):36–56. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Design Council (2014) The design process: what is the Double Diamond? Retrieved from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond

  • Eden C, Ackermann F (1998) Making strategy: the journey of strategic management. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC, Harvey J-F (2018) Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Hum Resour Manag Rev 28(4):347–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald B, Menning A, Nicolai C, Weinberg U (2019) Emotions along the design thinking process. In: Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research, pp 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97082-0_3

  • George JM, King EB (2007) Potential pitfalls of affect convergence in teams: functions and dysfunctions of group affective tone. In: Mannix EA, Neale MA, Anderson CP (eds) Research on managing groups and teams, vol 10. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 97–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin K (2009) Designing for the digital age: how to create human-centered products and services. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaner S (2014) Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making, 3rd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayes AB, Christopher Kayes D, Kolb D (2005) Experiential learning in teams. Simul Gaming 36(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JM, Choi JN, Park OS (2012) Intuitiveness and creativity in groups: cross-level interactions between group conflict and individual cognitive styles. Soc Behav Pers 40(9):1419–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter JP (2012) Accelerate! Harvard Bus Rev (November 2012). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2012/11/accelerate

  • Lawrence PR, Nohria N (2002) Driven: how human nature shapes our choices. Jossey Bass, San Fransisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Hum Relat 1:5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long F (2009) Real or imaginary: the effectiveness of using personas in product design, research paper published in the Irish Ergonomics Review. In: Proceedings of the IES conference 2009, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelow AL (1981) Environmental scanning—the impact of the stakeholder concept. In: ICIS 1981 proceedings, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Meroni A, Selloni D, Rossi M (2018) Massive codesign, a proposal for a collaborative design framework. Franco Angeli Design International Series, Milan, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • The Behavioural Insights Team (2014) EAST. Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A (2014) Value proposition design: how to create products and services customers want. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ (2014) Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sario PD (2017) Il facilitatore dei gruppi. Guida pratica per la facilitazione esperta in azienda e nel sociale. Milan: Franco Angeli (Group facilitator. Practical guide for expert facilitation within companies and social contexts—Title translated by author)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1987) Process consultation

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclavi M (2008) An Italian Lady Goes to the Bronx. IPOC Italian paths of culture, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y (2014) Positive group affect and team creativity. Small Group Res 45(3):337–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star SL (1989) The structure of Ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Gasser L, Huhns M (eds) Distributed artificial intelligence, vol 2. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco Cal, pp 37–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stickdorn M, Hormess ME, Lawrence A, Schneider J (2018) This is service design doing

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschepe S (2018) Warm-ups in design thinking—more than just a game. https://uxdesign.cc/warm-ups-in-design-thinking-more-than-just-a-game-7f755fcc8497

  • van Dijk H, van Engen ML, van Knippenberg D (2012) Defying conventional wisdom: a meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 119:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Stamm B (2003) Managing innovation, design and creativity. Wiley, West Sussex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker CJ (2010) Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? J Posit Psychol 5(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Rossi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rossi, M. (2021). Experimenting Human Resource Design in Practice. In: Human Resource Design. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87612-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics