Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to International Relations ((CIR))

  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

It was not only Afghanistan that suffered from the USA’s vengeful bombing for the 9/11 attack, but also Iraq, despite the fact that Saddam Hussein’s regime had absolutely nothing to do with the attack, nor with al-Qaeda, to which Saddam was strongly opposed. Deluded as to Saddam’s involvement, on 18 March 2003, President Bush authorised the invasion of Iraq as being consistent with the policy of the USA to take action against those who ‘aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001’ [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Letter from President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, March 18, 2003 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/03/print/20030319-1

  2. Arendt, Hannah,’ ‘The Human Condition’ (University of Chicago (1958) p.241

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  4. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/re/eases/2002/

  5. Salmond,Alex,Hansard,26th Feb 2003,Column 323

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Independent 30 November 2001

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke,Kenneth,Hansard,26th February 2003 Column 293

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Daily Telegraph, 30th September 2002

    Google Scholar 

  10. Norton-Taylor,Richard, ‘Church leaders petition No 10’, www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/aug/07/uk.religion

  11. Norton-Taylor,Richard, ‘Church leaders petition No 10’, www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/aug/07/uk.religion

  12. The Guardian 29th September 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Independent 22nd June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  14. Casualties in Iraq. Antiwar.com

  15. Bellasco,Amy:The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and other Global War on Terror Operations since 9/11.Congressional Research Service, March 29, 2011. www.crs.gov

  16. BBC World News,21st Jul 2010 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10637526

  17. Daily Mail 21st June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  18. ‘Al-Qaeda leaders have proclaimed Iraq a major front in their global terrorist campaign’. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, USA,July 9,2005

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zarqawi pledges allegiance to Osama Dawn October 18 2004

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Times April 21st 2015

    Google Scholar 

  21. Caerusassociates.com/news 23 September 2014/Who the US Should Really Hit in ISIS –see also: www.vox.com/2014/6/20/5824480/why-the-iraqi-army-cant-defeat-isis.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wells, A. (2022). Iraq 2003: Deluded Revenge. In: The Importance of Forgiveness and the Futility of Revenge. Contributions to International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87552-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics