Abstract
This chapter uses the results of the past two assessments of basin-wide water resource development scenarios to analyze potential benefits for economic development to meet the ambitious goal of the Lower Mekong Basin (LMB) countries for poverty reduction and, at the same time, analyze risks of potential trans-boundary trade-offs which will require appropriate mechanism to be in place. The scenario assessment results present both opportunities and risks associated with different levels of water resource development in the Mekong countries and its implications of the water diplomacy for both Lower and Upper Mekong basin. Each of the scenario results presents the trans-boundary trade-off which requires appropriate skills, capacities of the LMB riparian countries, and water diplomacy to discuss and negotiate for the solutions. Finally, this chapter provides some suggestions and policy implications for sustainable water resource development in the Mekong region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For further details, see Basist and Williams (2020).
- 2.
Three sub-scenarios for 2040 were developed to explore the interactions between water resources development and changes in climate. Comparisons between scenarios M3 and CC2, for instance, measure the effect of water resources development at the level of 2040 under a climate that is even wetter than mean projections.
References
ADB (2003), Water for All: The Water Policy of the Asian Development Bank. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Bainbridge, A. and S. Vimonsuk (2020), ‘China’s Mekong River Dams Are Generating Renewable Energy, but Are Costing Locals Their Livelihoods’, ABC News, 19 January. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-01-20/china-mekong-river-plan-creates-renewable-energy-but-costs-jobs/11872640 (accessed 2 June 2020).
Basist, A. and C. Williams (2020), Monitoring the Quantity of Water Flowing Through the Upper Mekong Basin Under Natural (Unimpeded) Conditions. Bangkok: Sustainable Infrastructure Partnership.
Bosba, D. (2018),‘Dynamics of Cooperation Mechanisms in the Mekong”, Khmer Times, 23 October, https://www.khmertimeskh.com/50543025/dynamics-of-cooperation-mechanisms-in-the-mekong/ (accessed 2 June 2020 ).
East–West Center and The Stimson Center Southeast Asia Program (2020), ‘The Mekong Matters for America/America Matters for the Mekong’. Washington, DC: East–West Center.
GMS Secretariat (2017), ‘How Risk Financing Can Help Mekong Farmers Cope with Disasters’, 2 October. https://greatermekong.org/how-risk-financing-can-help-mekong-farmers-cope-disasters (accessed 2 June 2020).
GMS Secretariat (2018), ‘Joint Summit Declaration: Leveraging 25 Years of Cooperation for a Sustainable, Integrated and Prosperous GMS’, Sixth GMS Summit, Ha Noi, 31 March.
Han Phoumin, Shigeru Kimura and Cecilya, Malik (2019) Energy Outlook and Saving Potential in the East Asia Region: Main Report. Ed (Shigeru and Han, 2019). Jakarta. ERIA. Downloadable at: https://think-asia.org/handle/11540/9786.
Hung, P.T. and A. Kenny (2017), ‘Application of Principles of Sustainable Development in the Mekong Dispute Settlement’, in M.-C. Cordonier Segger with C.G. Weeramantry (eds.) Sustainable Development Principles in the Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals: 1992–2012, Oxon: Routledge, pp.702–20.
Lancang–Mekong Cooperation China Secretariat (2018), Five-Year Plan of Action on Lancang-Mekong Cooperation (2018–2022). Beijing: Lancang–Mekong Cooperation China Secretariat.
Mekong Water Data Initiative (n.d.), https://www.mekongwater.org/about-us (accessed 9 April 2020).
MRC (2003a), MRC Navigation Strategy. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission.
MRC (2003b), Procedures for Notification, Prior Consultation and Agreement. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission.
MRC (2003c), Public Participation Strategy. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission.
MRC (2009), Communication Strategy and Disclosure Policy. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.
MRC (2010a), Strategic Environmental Assessment of Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream: Summary of the Final Report. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission.
MRC (2010b) Assessment of Basin-wide development scenarios (BDP, 2010).
MRC (2017), The Council Study: The Study on the Sustainable Management and Development of the Mekong River Basin including the Impacts of Mainstream Hydropower Projects. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.
MRC (2018a), Fisheries. http://www.mrcmekong.org/topics/fisheries/ (accessed 2 June 2020).
MRC (2018b), Short Technical Note: Mekong Sediment from the Mekong River Commission Study. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.
MRC (n.d.), MRC Data and Information Services. https://portal.mrcmekong.org/home (accessed 13 April 2020).
Hoang Nam (2020), ‘Các nước sông Mekong kêu gọi đập Xayaburi chia sẻ dữ liệu’, 24 February. http://khoahocphattrien.vn/thoi-su-quoc-te/cac-nuoc-song-mekong-keu-goi-dap-xayaburi-chia-se-du-lieu/20200221045830774p882c919.htm (accessed 2 June 2020).
Parameswaran, P. (2017), ‘Mekong Disaster Drills Highlight US-ASEAN Subregional Cooperation’, The Diplomat, 14 December. https://thediplomat.com/2017/12/mekong-disaster-drills-highlight-us-asean-subregional-cooperation/ (last accessed on 2 June 2020).
Schmeier, S. (2013), Governing International Watercourses: River Basin Organizations and the Sustainable Governance of Internationally Shared Rivers and Lakes. Oxon: Routledge.
Sotheary, P. (2019), ‘Taking a Closer Look at the MRC’s Prior Consultation Process’, Khmer Times, Blog, 6 November. https://www.khmertimeskh.com/50657344/taking-a-closer-look-at-the-mrcs-prior-consultation-process/ (last accessed on 2 June 2020).
Sovacool, B.K. (2011), ‘An International Comparison of Four Polycentric Approaches to Climate and Energy Governance’, Energy Policy, 39(6), 3832–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.014 (last accessed on 2 June).
Statista (2018), ‘Principal Rice Exporting Countries Worldwide in 2017/2018 (in 1,000 metric tons)’, https://www.statista.com/statistics/255947/top-rice-exporting-countries-worldwide-2011/ (accessed 2 June 2020).
Thu, T. and L. Tinh (2019), ‘Vietnam and Mekong Cooperative Mechanisms’, in D. Singh and M. Cook (eds.), Southeast Asian Affairs 2019. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, 395–411.
To Minh Thu and Vu Thi Thanh Tu (2019), 'The Lower Mekong Initiative: 10-year Retrospect and Future Prospects’, International Studies, 41.
Vannarith, C. (2019), ‘Water Security in the Mekong Region and Policy Interventions’, CSCAP Regional Security Outlook 2020. Hanoi: Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific.
Vietnam Disaster Management Authority (2020), ‘MARD Report on the Drought and Saltwater Intrusion in Mekong River Delta’, 19 February. http://phongchongthientai.mard.gov.vn/en/Pages/mard-report-on-the-drought-and-saltwater-intrusion-in-mekong-river-delta.aspx?item=/en/Pages/mard-report-on-the-drought-and-saltwater-intrusion-in-mekong-river-delta.aspx (accessed 2 June 2020).
WWF (2020), ‘Mekong Deforestation’. https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/deforestation_fronts2/deforestation_in_greater_mekong/ (accessed 8 May 2020).
Yoshida, Y. et al. (2020), ‘Impacts of Mainstream Hydropower Dams on Fisheries and Agriculture in Lower Mekong Basin’, Sustainability, 12, 2408. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2408/pdf (accessed 2 June 2020).
Acknowledgement
The authors express their gratitude to the Mekong River Commission Secretariat (MRCS) for providing access to the results of its Council Study, basin-wide scenario assessment, and the most up-to-date information on Mekong water resources development and cooperation, as the basis of data/information to write the chapter on water resources development in the Mekong as part of the contribution of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) to Viet Nam’s 2020 ASEAN Chairmanship deliverable. Special thanks go to An Pich Hatda, the Chief Executive Officer of the MRCS, who granted us permission, made these documents available, and provided guidance on sensitivity and water politics in the Mekong countries. This chapter draws from a study originally published as an ERIA Discussion Paper (No. 339) in September 2020.
Disclaimer
Any view expressed in this chapter is solely the responsibility of the authors, not reflected the views of the organizations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phoumin, H., Thu, T.M., Ly, T. (2022). Sustainable Water Resource Development in the Lower Mekong Basin: Synergies and Trade-Offs across Borders and Sectors. In: Antoniades, A., Antonarakis, A.S., Kempf, I. (eds) Financial Crises, Poverty and Environmental Sustainability: Challenges in the Context of the SDGs and Covid-19 Recovery. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87417-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87417-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87416-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87417-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)