Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Big Data and Blockchain for Service Operations Management pp 139–161Cite as

Big Data for Educational Service Management

Part of the Studies in Big Data book series (SBD,volume 98)

Abstract

With over 3.7 billion people using the Internet in 2018, the amount of data being generated has exceeded 2.5 quintillion bytes per day. This rapid increase in the generation of data has pushed the applications of big data to new heights. Like any other field, education must also have its share of applications. Large amounts of data generated in the education sector can be harvested for useful information that can improve the delivery of education inside and outside of classroom. This chapter presents a survey of the state-of-the-art applications of big data analytics in the field of educational services. Educational services consist of all the tasks and subtasks that support the education process and help it achieve its goals. The utilization of big data is expected to increase the satisfaction of all stakeholders of a higher education institute. Educational services are not limited to teaching and learning processes in the classroom, rather they include efficient registration and administrative process, library services, research activities, extracurricular activities, and overall development of faculty and students. This chapter explains how big data can help in improving the overall education services. It also describes the challenges that institutions face while implementing big data-based solutions. Finally. This chapter suggests the possible directions for future research that can be explored to maximize the benefits of big data in improving educational services.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Simeon, R. (2013). Working in the global economy: How to develop and manage your career across borders. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuzu, Ö. H., Gökbel, H., & Güleş, H. K. (2013). Developing sustainable relations with internal and external stakeholders in universities: Vision and mission views. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 281–289.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall, S. J., & Marshall, S. J. (2018). Internal and External Stakeholders in Higher Education. In Shaping the university of the future (pp. 77–102). Springer Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ishikiriyama, C. S., & Carlos Francisco Simoes, G. (2017). Big Data: A global overview. In A. Emrouznejad, & V. Charles, (Eds.), Big Data for the greater good (pp. 35–50). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laney, D. (2001). 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity and variety.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Furht, B., & Villanustre, F. (2016). Introduction to big data. In Big Data technologies and applications (pp. 3–11). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oussous, A., Benjelloun, F.-Z., Ait Lahcen, A., & Belfkih, S. (2018). Big Data technologies: A survey,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 431–448, Oct. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charles, V., & Gherman, T. (2013). Achieving Competitive Advantage Through Big Data. Strategic Implications. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 16(8), 1069–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shafer, T. (2017). The 42 V’s of Big Data and Data Science. Elder Research, Inc. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.kdnuggets.com/2017/04/42-vs-big-data-data-science.html.

  10. World Development Indicators|The World Bank. (2017). The World Bank. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/4.2.

  11. Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Ray, S. K., & Saeed, M. (2015). Mobile learning using social media platforms: An empirical analysis of users’ behaviours. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 9(3), 258–270.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah, D. (2018). By The Numbers: MOOCS in 2017—Class Central. Retrieved April 9, 2019, fromhttps://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2017.

  14. Atif, Y., Mathew, S. S., & Lakas, A. (2015). Building a smart campus to support ubiquitous learning. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 6(2), 223–238.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Junco, R., & Clem, C. (2015). Predicting course outcomes with digital textbook usage data. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 54–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Daniel, B.K., & Butson, R. (2013). Technology Enhanced Analytics (TEA) in Higher Education. In International conference on educational technologies (ICEduTech) (pp. 89–96).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rajabi, E., & Beheshti, A. (2016). Interlinking Big Data to Web of Data. In Ali, E. (Ed.), Big Data optimization: Recent developments and challenges (pp. 133–145). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Besbes, R., & Besbes, S. (2016). Cognitive dashboard for teachers professional development. In Qatar foundation annual research conference (pp. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 40(6), 601–618.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, S., & Fang, N. (2013). Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models. Computers & Education, 61, 133–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. LACE SoLAR Flare (OU, 2015) | Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR). Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.solaresearch.org/events/flare/lace-solar-flare-ou-2015/.

  22. M. Murphy, S. Redding, and J. S. Twyman (2016). Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools. In Center on Innovations in Learning, Temple University. 1301 Cecil B Moore Avenue Ritter Annex 422, Philadelphia, PA 19122. Tel: 215-204-3364; Fax: 215-204-5130; Web site: http://www.centeril.org.

  23. Romero-Zaldivar, V.-A., Pardo, A., Burgos, D., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2012). Monitoring student progress using virtual appliances: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1058–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kop, R. (2010). The Design and Development of a Personal Learning Environment: Researching the Learning Experience. In European Distance and E-learning Network annual Conference 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baker, R. S. J. d, & Siemens, G. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Learn. Anal. Knowl. - LAK ’12 (p. 252).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Santosh, R., & Mohammed, S. (2018). Applications of educational data mining and learning analytics in handling Big Data in higher education. In Mohammed, M., & Alani, O. A., Tawfik, H., Saeed, M. (Eds.), Applications of Big Data analytics: Trends, issues, and challenges ( pp. 135–160). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The Cisco Connected Learning Experience Strategies for Higher Education. (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Blikstein, P. (2011). Using learning analytics to assess students’ behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge - LAK ’11 (p. 110).

    Google Scholar 

  30. NetLogo. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.

  31. Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2009). Prediction of student’s mood during an online test using formula-based and neural network-based method. Computers & Education, 53(3), 644–652.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeong, H.-Y., Choi, C.-R., & Song, Y.-J. (2012). Personalized learning course planner with E-learning DSS using user profile. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2567–2577.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. Arrigo, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., & Kismihok, G. (2012). Meta-analyses from a collaborative project in mobile lifelong learning. British Educational Research Journal, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lin, C. F., Yeh, Y., Hung, Y. H., & Chang, R. I. (2013). Data mining for providing a personalized learning path in creativity: An application of decision trees. Computers & Education, 68, 199–210.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. Hsu, M.-H. (2008). A personalized English learning recommender system for ESL students. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 683–688.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Méndez, J. R., Fdez-Riverola, F., Iglesias, E. L., Díaz, F., & Corchado, J. M. (2006). Tracking concept drift at feature selection stage in spamhunting: an anti-spam instance-based reasoning system (pp. 504–518). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khaing, K. T. (2010). Enhanced features ranking and selection using recursive feature elimination ( RFE ) and k-nearest neighbor algorithms in support vector machine for intrusion detection system.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chien, C.-F., Wang, W.-C., & Cheng, J.-C. (2007). Data mining for yield enhancement in semiconductor manufacturing and an empirical study. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 192–198.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee, Y.-J. (2012). Developing an efficient computational method that estimates the ability of students in a Web-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 579–589.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  40. Abdous, M., He, W., & Yen, C.-J. (2012). Using Data Mining for Predicting Relationships between Online Question Theme and Final Grade.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lykourentzou, I., Giannoukos, I., Nikolopoulos, V., Mpardis, G., & Loumos, V. (2009). Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Computers & Education, 53(3), 950–965.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  42. Dekker, G. W., Pechenizkiy, M., & Vleeshouwers, J. M. (2009). Predicting students drop out: A case study. In The 2nd international conference on educational data mining (pp. 41–50).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge—LAK ’13. (p. 170).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285–292.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  45. He, W. (2013). Examining students’ online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 90–102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. Dejaeger, K., Goethals, F., Giangreco, A., Mola, L., & Baesens, B. (2012). Gaining insight into student satisfaction using comprehensible data mining techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(2), 548–562.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  47. Xing, W., Guo, R., Petakovic, E., & Goggins, S. (2015). Participation-based student final performance prediction model through interpretable Genetic Programming: Integrating learning analytics, educational data mining and theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 168–181.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  48. Zacharis, N. Z. (2015). A multivariate approach to predicting student outcomes in web-enabled blended learning courses. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 44–53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  49. Niemi, D., & Gitin, E. (2012). Using Big Data to predict student dropouts: Technology affordances for research. In IADIS International conference on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age (pp. 261–264).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mouri, K., Okubo, F., Shimada, A., & Ogata, H. (2016). Bayesian network for predicting students’ final grade using e-book logs in university education. In 2016 IEEE 16th international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT) (pp. 85–89).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kizilcec, R. F., Bailenson, J. N., & Gomez, C. J. (2015). The instructor’s face in video instruction: Evidence from two large-scale field studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 724–739.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  52. De Freitas, S. (2018). Education in computer generated environmentS. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gibson, D. C., Webb, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Challenges of Big Data in educational assessment. In 12th International conference on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age (pp. 92–100).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  55. Romero, C., Zafra, A., Luna, J. M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Association rule mining using genetic programming to provide feedback to instructors from multiple-choice quiz data. Expert Systems, 30(2), 162–172.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  56. Pechenizkiy, M., Calders, T., Vasilyeva, E., & De Bra, P. (2008). Mining the student assessment data: Lessons drawn from a small scale case study. In International conference on educational data mining (pp. 187–191).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2016). Recommending self-regulated learning strategies does not improve performance in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the third (2016) ACM conference on learning @ Scale - L@S ’16 (pp. 101–104).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rogers, T., & Feller, A. (2016). Discouraged by Peer excellence: exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting. Psychological Science, 27(3), 365–374.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  59. Kizilcec, R. F., & Brooks, C. (2017). Diverse Big Data and randomized field experiments in MOOCs. In Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 211–222).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Musto, C., Semeraro, G., De Gemmis, M., & Lops, P. (2015). Word embedding techniques for content-based recommender systems: An empirical evaluation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1441, 448–456.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ng, I. C. L., & Forbes, J. (2009). Education as service: The understanding of university experience through the service logic. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19(1), 38–64.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  62. Białoń, L. (2015). Creating marketing strategies for higher education institutions. Minib, 18(4), 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Teets, M., & Goldner, M. (2013). Libraries’ role in curating and exposing Big Data. Future Internet, 5(3), 429–438.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  64. Hoy, M. B. (2014). Big Data: An introduction for librarians. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 33(3), 320–326.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhan, M., & Widén, G. (2018). Public libraries: Roles in Big Data. The Electronic Library, 36(1), 133–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  66. Noh, Y. (2015). Imagining library 4.0: Creating a model for future libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 786–797.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  67. Shen, Y., & Varvel, V. E. (2013). Developing data management services at the johns hopkins university. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 552–557.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  68. Brooklyn Public Library. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.bklynlibrary.org/. [Accessed: 09-Apr-2019].

  69. Brooklyn Public Library saves time, money, and headcount with Tableau | Tableau Software. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.tableau.com/solutions/customer/brooklyn-public-library-saves-time-money-and-headcount-tableau.

  70. Tulasi, B. (2013). Significance of Big Data and analytics in higher education. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 68(14), 21–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  71. HomeCourt. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.homecourt.ai/.

  72. ORU students log 3 billion steps on Fitbit devices—Washington Times. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/20/oru-students-log-3-billion-steps-on-fitbit-devices/

  73. Baker, R., Dee, T., Evans, B., & John, J. (2018). Bias in online classes: Evidence from a field experiment (CEPA working paper no. 18-03). Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis, (18).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  75. Jones, S. J. (2012). Technology review: The possibilities of learning analytics to improve learner-centered decision-making. Community College Enterprise, 18(1), 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Charles, V., Tavana, M., & Gherman, T. (2015). The right to be forgotten—Is privacy sold out in the big data age? International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 7(4), 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Nielsen, K. (2017). Big Data and Sensitive Data. In Emrouznejad, A., & V. Charles (Eds.), Big Data for the greater good (pp. 183–204). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an ‘early warning system’ for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  79. A. Emrouznejad and M. Marra, “Big data: Who, what and where? Social, cognitive and journals map of big data publication,” in Big Data Optimization: Recent Developments and Challenges, A. Emrouznejad, Ed. Springer, 2017, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  80. V. Charles and A. Emrouznejad, “Big Data for the Greater Good: An Introduction,” in Big Data for the Greater Good, A. Emrouznejad and V. Charles, Eds. Springer, 2017, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  81. C. Boulton, “Big data on campus | CIO,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.cio.com/article/3121250/education/big-data-on-campus.html. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2018].

  82. Smarter Education with IBM Business Analytics. Smarter Analytics, 2012. Retrieved December 21, 2018, from ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/la/documents/gb/mx/Business_Analytics_for_Higher_Education.pdf.

  83. Kellen, V., Recktenwald, A., & Burr, S. (2013). Applying Big Data in higher education: A case study | cutter consortium. Retrieved December 21, 2018, from https://www.cutter.com/article/applying-big-data-higher-education-case-study-400836.

  84. Macfadyen, L. P. (2017). Overcoming barriers to educational analytics: How systems thinking and pragmatism can help. Educational Technology, 57, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Daniel, B. K. (2017). Big Data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101–113.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  86. Daniel, B. K. (2017). Big data and learning analytics in higher education: Current theory and practice. Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  87. “NMC Horizon Report > 2016 Higher Education Edition | The New Media Consortium.” [Online]. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2016-higher-education-edition/.

  88. R. C. Fogel (2010). The Education Cloud: Delivering Education as a Service. https://www.k12blueprint.com/sites/default/files/ITDM_education_cloud_final.pdf.

  89. Least Developed Countries on track to achieve SDG 9.c on universal and affordable Internet access by 2020. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/2018-PR02.aspx.

  90. Protalinski, E. (2019). Google Go launches globally on Android. Retrieved August 24, 2019, from https://venturebeat.com/2019/08/20/google-go-launches-globally-on-android/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of IT, Al Khawarizmi International College, Al Ain, UAE

    Santosh Kumar Ray

  2. School of Information Technology Administration and Security, Seneca College, Toronto, Canada

    Mohammed M. Alani

  3. College of Information Technology, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE

    Amir Ahmad

Authors
  1. Santosh Kumar Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammed M. Alani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed M. Alani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Surrey Business School, The University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

    Prof. Ali Emrouznejad

  2. Center for Value Chain Innovation, CENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru

    Prof. Vincent Charles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ray, S.K., Alani, M.M., Ahmad, A. (2022). Big Data for Educational Service Management. In: Emrouznejad, A., Charles, V. (eds) Big Data and Blockchain for Service Operations Management. Studies in Big Data, vol 98. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87304-2_5

Download citation

search

Navigation