Skip to main content

Imaging Modalities in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Computerized Tomography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pulmonary Embolism
  • 2079 Accesses

Abstract

Computerized tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is currently the imaging modality of choice for the workup of suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with high sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values. As such, CTPA is at the core of the pathway for the diagnosis and management of PE. Correct and timely performance, interpretation and reporting of CTPA studies is mandatory for successful management of patients with acute PE, and greatly depends on various elements, from the moment the patient is lying in the CT machine to the delivery of the report. In the following chapter, we systematically cover these elements along with multiple CT images of both normal and pathological appearance of pulmonary arteries, lungs and mediastinum. We review the main technical considerations for achieving high image quality and avoiding artifacts, thus reducing the number of indeterminate studies, while minimizing as much as possible radiation dose and contrast material volume. We present both normal and pathological CTPA appearance of the pulmonary arteries, including the classic appearances and signs of PE, common lung parenchyma findings and CT predictors of PE severity and clinical outcome. Recent technological developments have introduced new CTPA tools and capabilities, further improving diagnosis, risk assessment and timely reporting. Dual energy CT (DECT) enables to create perfusion maps of lung parenchyma, improving the ability to detect small subsegmental PE and to assess the effect of PE on lung parenchyma. By improving arterial enhancement, DECT improves PE detection, may salvage technically low quality studies and may enable reduction in contrast material volume and radiation dose. Another recent tool in use is artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for automatic PE detection. AI algorithms can improve inexperienced readers’ accuracy, can shorten CTPA reading times and can detect incidental PE in CT examinations performed for other indications in a non-CTPA protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Hull RD, Leeper KV Jr, Popovich J Jr, Quinn DA, Sos TA, Sostman HD, Tapson VF, Wakefield TW, Weg JG, Woodard PK; PIOPED II Investigators. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22):2317–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052367. PMID: 16738268.

  2. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ, Schoepf UJ. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(16):2012–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.16.2012. PMID: 15855435.

  3. Patel P, Patel P, Bhatt M, Braun C, Begum H, Wiercioch W, Varghese J, Wooldridge D, Alturkmani H, Thomas M, Baig M, Bahaj W, Khatib R, Kehar R, Ponnapureddy R, Sethi A, Mustafa A, Lim W, Le Gal G, Bates SM, Haramati LB, Kline J, Lang E, Righini M, Kalot MA, Husainat NM, Jabiri YNA, Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. Blood Adv. 2020;4(18):4296–311. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001052. PMID: 32915980; PMCID: PMC7509887.

  4. Wittram C. How I do it: CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1255–61. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1104 PMID: 17449768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bae KT, Tao C, Gürel S, Hong C, Zhu F, Gebke TA, Milite M, Hildebolt CF. Effect of patient weight and scanning duration on contrast enhancement during pulmonary multidetector CT angiography. Radiology. 2007;242(2):582–9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422052132 PMID: 17255426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones SE, Wittram C. The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology. 2005;237(1):329–37. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2371041520 PMID: 16183940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cademartiri F, van der Lugt A, Luccichenti G, Pavone P, Krestin GP. Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Jul-Aug;26(4):598–607. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200207000-00022. PMID: 12218827.

  8. Saade C, Bourne R, Wilkinson M, Brennan P. Contrast Medium Administration and Parameters Affecting Bolus Geometry in Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: An Overview. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2011 Sep;42(3):113-117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 27. PMID: 31051857

  9. Taslakian B, Latson LA, Truong MT, Aaltonen E, Shiau MC, Girvin F, Alpert JB, Wickstrom M, Ko JP. CT pulmonary angiography of adult pulmonary vascular diseases: Technical considerations and interpretive pitfalls. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Nov;85(11):2049-2063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Sep 16. PMID: 27776659

  10. Foti G, Silva R, Faccioli N, Fighera A, Menghini R, Campagnola A, Carbognin G. Identification of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of venous-phase dual-energy CT in comparison to pulmonary arteries CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1923-1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07286-7. Epub 2020 Sep 23. PMID: 32965572

  11. Andreou AK, Curtin JJ, Wilde S, Clark A. Does pregnancy affect vascular enhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography? Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2716-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1114-7. Epub 2008 Jul 24. PMID: 18651147

  12. Mortimer AM, Singh RK, Hughes J, Greenwood R, Hamilton MC. Use of expiratory CT pulmonary angiography to reduce inspiration and breath-hold associated artefact: contrast dynamics and implications for scan protocol. Clin Radiol. 2011 Dec;66(12):1159-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Sep 1. PMID: 21889766

  13. Bauer RW, Schell B, Beeres M, Wichmann JL, Bodelle B, Vogl TJ, Kerl JM. High-pitch dual-source computed tomography pulmonary angiography in freely breathing patients. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27(6):376–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e318250067e PMID: 22487993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shuman WP, Leipsic JA, Busey JM, Green DE, Pipavath SN, Hague CJ, Koprowicz KM. Prospectively ECG gated CT pulmonary angiography versus helical ungated CT pulmonary angiography: impact on cardiac related motion artifacts and patient radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2444-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.017. Epub 2011 Jun 23. PMID: 21703791

  15. Saade C, Bourne R, El-Merhi F, Somanathan A, Chakraborty D, Brennan P. An optimised patient-specific approach to administration of contrast agent for CT pulmonary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3205-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2919-6. Epub 2013 Jun 4. PMID: 23732690

  16. Marten K, Engelke C, Funke M, Obenauer S, Baum F, Grabbe E. ECG-gated multislice spiral CT for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism Clin Radiol. 2003;58(11):862–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00348-9 PMID: 14581010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palacio D, Benveniste MF, Betancourt-Cuellar SL, Gladish GW. Multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography pitfalls in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism with emphasis in technique. Semin Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;50(3):217-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 3. PMID: 26002242

  18. Moore AJE, Wachsmann J, Chamarthy MR, Panjikaran L, Tanabe Y, Rajiah P. Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Jun;8(3):225-243. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.12.01. PMID: 30057872; PMCID: PMC6039809

  19. Coche EE, Müller NL, Kim KI, Wiggs BR, Mayo JR. Acute pulmonary embolism: ancillary findings at spiral CT. Radiology. 1998;207(3):753–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.3.9609900 PMID: 9609900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah AA, Davis SD, Gamsu G, Intriere L. Parenchymal and pleural findings in patients with and patients without acute pulmonary embolism detected at spiral CT. Radiology. 1999;211(1):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap03147 PMID: 10189464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meinel FG, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ, Hoffmann VS, Thierfelder KM, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ, Bamberg F. Predictive Value of Computed Tomography in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2015 Jul;128(7):747-59.e2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Feb 11. PMID: 25680885

  22. Albrecht MH, Bickford MW, Nance JW Jr, Zhang L, De Cecco CN, Wichmann JL, Vogl TJ, Schoepf UJ. State-of-the-Art Pulmonary CT Angiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):495-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17202. Epub 2016 Nov 29. PMID: 27897042

  23. Kang DK, Ramos-Duran L, Schoepf UJ, Armstrong AM, Abro JA, Ravenel JG, Thilo C. Reproducibility of CT signs of right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1500–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3717 PMID: 20489089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ammari Z, Hasnie AA, Ruzieh M, Dasa O, Al-Sarie M, Shastri P, Ashcherkin N, Brewster PS, Cooper CJ, Gupta R. Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography Versus Echocardiography Derived Right to Left Ventricular Diameter Ratio in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Am J Med Sci. 2021 Apr;361(4):445-450. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Jul 8. PMID: 32753280

  25. Kang DK, Thilo C, Schoepf UJ, Barraza JM Jr, Nance JW Jr, Bastarrika G, Abro JA, Ravenel JG, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ. CT signs of right ventricular dysfunction: prognostic role in acute pulmonary embolism JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(8):841–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.04.013 PMID: 21835376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aviram G, Cohen D, Steinvil A, Shmueli H, Keren G, Banai S, Berliner S, Rogowski O. Significance of reflux of contrast medium into the inferior vena cava on computerized tomographic pulmonary angiogram. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 1;109(3):432-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.033. Epub 2011 Nov 9. PMID: 22074991

  27. François CJ, Schiebler ML. Imaging of Pulmonary Hypertension. Radiol Clin North Am. 2016 Nov;54(6):1133-1149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Aug 13. PMID: 27719980

  28. Collomb D, Paramelle PJ, Calaque O, Bosson JL, Vanzetto G, Barnoud D, Pison C, Coulomb M, Ferretti G. Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation using helical CT. Eur Radiol. 2003 Jul;13(7):1508-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1804-5. Epub 2003 Feb 7. PMID: 12835961

  29. Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Willems V, Lambermont B, Gerard P, D'Orio V, Gevenois PA, Dondelinger RF. Severe pulmonary embolism:pulmonary artery clot load scores and cardiovascular parameters as predictors of mortality. Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):884-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2392050075. Epub 2006 Apr 7. PMID: 16603659

  30. Staskiewicz G, Czekajska-Chehab E, Przegalinski J, Tomaszewski A, Torres K, Torres A, Trojanowska A, Maciejewski R, Drop A. Widening of coronary sinus in CT pulmonary angiography indicates right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jul;20(7):1615-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1702-1. Epub 2010 Jan 13. PMID: 20069425

  31. Zuin M, Rigatelli G, Turchetta S, Zonzin P, Zuliani G, Roncon L. Left atrial size measured on CT pulmonary angiography: another parameter of pulmonary embolism severity? A systematic review. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jul;50(1):181–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01994-8. PMID: 31754905.

  32. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Vieillard-Baron A, Joseph T, Mesurolle B, Oliva VL, Barré O, Bruckert F, Dubourg O, Lacombe P. New CT index to quantify arterial obstruction in pulmonary embolism: comparison with angiographic index and echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jun;176(6):1415-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761415. PMID: 11373204

  33. Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Masson P, Galland E, Delannoy V, Bauchart JJ, Remy J. Severity of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of a new spiral CT angiographic score in correlation with echocardiographic data. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1515-y. Epub 2002 Jun 19. PMID: 12541107

  34. Vedovati MC, Germini F, Agnelli G, Becattini C. Prognostic role of embolic burden assessed at computed tomography angiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(12):2092–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12429. PMID: 24134450

  35. McCollough CH, Boedeker K, Cody D, Duan X, Flohr T, Halliburton SS, Hsieh J, Layman RR, Pelc NJ. Principles and applications of multienergy CT: Report of AAPM Task Group 291. Med Phys. 2020;47(7):e881–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14157. Epub 2020 May 28. PMID: 32215937.

  36. Apfaltrer P, Bachmann V, Meyer M, Henzler T, Barraza JM, Gruettner J, Walter T, Schoepf UJ, Schoenberg SO, Fink C. Prognostic value of perfusion defect volume at dual energy CTA in patients with pulmonary embolism: correlation with CTA obstruction scores, CT parameters of right ventricular dysfunction and adverse clinical outcome. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3592–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Apr 9. PMID: 22495202.

  37. Bauer RW, Frellesen C, Renker M, Schell B, Lehnert T, Ackermann H, Schoepf UJ, Jacobi V, Vogl TJ, Kerl JM. Dual energy CT pulmonary blood volume assessment in acute pulmonary embolism—correlation with D-dimer level, right heart strain and clinical outcome. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(9):1914-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2135-1. Epub 2011 Apr 30. PMID: 21533631.

  38. Weikert T, Winkel DJ, Bremerich J, Stieltjes B, Parmar V, Sauter AW, Sommer G. Automated detection of pulmonary embolism in CT pulmonary angiograms using an AI-powered algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(12):6545–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06998-0. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PMID: 32621243

  39. Malhamé I, Tagalakis V, Dayan N. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: synthesis of current guidelines and new evidence. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(12):1546–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PMID: 32723607.

  40. Tester J, Hammerschlag G, Irving L, Pascoe D, Rees M. Investigation and diagnostic imaging of suspected pulmonary embolism during pregnancy and the puerperium: A review of the literature. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020;64(4):505–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13027. Epub 2020 Apr 20. PMID: 32307898.

  41. Tromeur C, van der Pol LM, Le Roux PY, Ende-Verhaar Y, Salaun PY, Leroyer C, Couturaud F, Kroft LJM, Huisman MV, Klok FA. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica. 2019;104(1):176–88. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.196121. Epub 2018 Aug 16. PMID: 30115658; PMCID: PMC6312023.

  42. van Mens TE, Scheres LJ, de Jong PG, Leeflang MM, Nijkeuter M, Middeldorp S. Imaging for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1(1):CD011053. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011053.pub2. PMID: 28124411; PMCID: PMC6464730.

  43. Armstrong L, Gleeson F, Mackillop L, Mutch S, Beale A. Survey of UK imaging practice for the investigation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(8):696–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 May 22. PMID: 28545681.

  44. Gillespie C, Foley S, Rowan M, Ewins K, NiAinle F, MacMahon P. The OPTICA study (Optimised Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Pregnancy Quality and Safety study): Rationale and design of a prospective trial assessing the quality and safety of an optimised CTPA protocol in pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2019;177:172–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 13. PMID: 30921536.

  45. Ridge CA, Mhuircheartaigh JN, Dodd JD, Skehan SJ. Pulmonary CT angiography protocol adapted to the hemodynamic effects of pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(5):1058–63. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5385. PMID: 22021496.

  46. Halpenny D, Park B, Alpert J, Latson L Jr, Kim N, Babb J, Shiau M, Ko J. Low dose computed tomography pulmonary angiography protocol for imaging pregnant patients: Can dose reduction be achieved without reducing image quality? Clin Imaging. 2017;44:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Apr 7. PMID: 28500985.

  47. McDermott S, Otrakji A, Flores EJ, Kalra MK, Shepard JO, Digumarthy SR. Should dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography replace single-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum patients? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000655. PMID: 28786905.

  48. Tonkopi E, Manos D, Ross A. Foes the use of contemporary CT scanners alter the radiation dose debate in the imaging work up for pulmonary embolism? Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019;187(3):353–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz174. PMID: 31411698

  49. Sauter AP, Shapira N, Kopp FK, Aichele J, Bodden J, Knipfer A, Rummeny EJ, Noël PB. CTPA with a conventional CT at 100 kVp vs. a spectral-detector CT at 120 kVp: Comparison of radiation exposure, diagnostic performance and image quality. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;7:100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100234. PMID: 32420413; PMCID: PMC7215101.

  50. Jones JG, Mills CN, Mogensen MA, Lee CI. Radiation dose from medical imaging: a primer for emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13(2):202–10. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.11.6804. PMID: 22900113; PMCID: PMC3415811.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cohen, D., Shaham, D. (2022). Imaging Modalities in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Computerized Tomography. In: Herzog, E. (eds) Pulmonary Embolism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87090-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87090-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87089-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87090-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics