Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Urban Regeneration Processes and Social Impact: A Literature Review to Explore the Role of Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12954))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

From urban regeneration to social regeneration up to culture-led regeneration, the concept of urban regeneration evolves from the idea of the physical transformation of cities to a more complex vision of changing able to improve the inhabitants’ quality of life. At the same time, the social dimension of the recognised impacts, from a factor juxtaposed to the regenerative processes, becomes central to build new models of “impact economy” with long-term sustainable effects. In this change of perspective, the driver is the repositioning of culture, the community's centrality and involvement, and the reuse of abandoned cultural heritage spaces. In urban regeneration processes, evaluation has thus assumed a decisive role in guiding strategic choices, empowering the communities involved, supporting decision-makers and attracting new funding. Starting from the keywords “urban regeneration” and “social impact”, the paper integrates the literature review with bibliometric maps through the VOSviewer tool to investigate the role of evaluation in a broader framework to feed the contemporary debate on the impacts of urban regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Evans, G., Shaw, P.: The contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: a review of evidence: a report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Santos, F.M.: A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ethics 111(3), 335–351 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-012-1413-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartling, B., Weber, R., Yao, L.: -T. Q. J. of and undefined 2015, Do markets erode social responsibility?, academic.oup.com, https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-85623

  4. Vanclay, F.: International principles for social impact assessment: their evolution. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 21(1), 3–4 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doucet, B.: Global flagships, local impacts. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Des. Plan. 162(3), 101–107 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ginsburg, N.: Putting the social into urban regeneration policy. Local Econ. 14(1), 55–71 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, G., Campbell, J., Brown, U.: The contribution of childcare to local employment: poor work or work for the poor? Local Econ. 16(3), 187–197 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawless, P., Else, P., Farnell, R., Furbey, R., Lund, S., Wishart, B.: Community based initiative and state urban policy: the Church Urban Fund. Reg. Stud. 32(2), 161–174 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, M.: Combating the social exclusion of housing estates. Hous. Stud. 13(6), 819–832 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodriguez, A., Martinez, E., Guenaga, G.: Uneven redevelopment: new urban policies and socio-spatial fragmentation in metropolitan Bilbao. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 8(2), 161–178 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, G.: Cultural Planning: An Urban Renaissance? Routledge, London (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlsen, J., Millan, A.: The links between mega events and urban renewal: the case of the Manchester 2002 Commonwealth Games (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia, B.: Deconstructing the city of culture: the long-term cultural legacies of Glasgow 1990. Urban Stud. 42(5–6), 841–868 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Calderini, M., Chiodo, V., Michelucci, F.V.: The social impact investment race: toward an interpretative framework. Eur. Bus. Rev. 30(1), 66–81 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2016-0134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coscia, C., Rubino, I.: Fostering New Value Chains and Social Impact-Oriented Strategies in Urban Regeneration Processes: What Challenges for the Evaluation Discipline? In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds.) NMP 2020. SIST, vol. 178, pp. 983–992. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_92

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Alijani, S., Karyotis, C.: I. B. and Finance, and undefined 2019, Coping with impact investing antagonistic objectives: A multistakeholder approach, Elsevier. Accessed 14 Jul 2021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531917306281

  17. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2), 523–538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: VOSviewer Manual. Univeristeit Leiden, Leiden, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–53 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Audit Commission for Local Authorities in England: Urban Regeneration and Economic Development: The Local Government Dimension. HM Stationery Office (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ofori, S.C.: Urban policy and environmental regeneration in two Scottish peripheral housing estates. Environmentalist 14(4), 283–295 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hubbard, P.: Re-imaging the city: the transformation of Birmingham's urban landscape, Geography 26–36 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Skelcher, C., McCabe, A., Lowndes, V., Joseph Rowntree Foundation: Community Networks in Urban Regeneration: ‘ItAll Depends Who You Know. Policy Press, United Kingdom, York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garside, P.L.: The significance of post-war London reconstruction plans for east end industry. Plan. Perspect. 12(1), 19–36 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/026654397364762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nevin, B., Shiner, P.: Community regeneration and empowerment: a new approach to partnership. Local Econ. 9(4), 308–322 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Commission on Social Justice: Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal. Vintage, Report of the Commission on Social Justice. London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.Y.: Making Democracy Work. Princeton University Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoatson, L., Grace, M.: Public housing redevelopment: opportunity for community regeneration? Urban Policy Res. 20(4), 429–441 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stollberg-Barkley, D.: The impact of socio-economic changes on the housing estate Leipzig-Grunau, Germany. Int. J. Hous. Its Appl. 31(1), 43–54 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parkin, S.: Sustainable development: the concept and the practical challenge. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.-Civil Eng. 138(6), 3–8 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. McKay, S., Murtagh, B.: Evaluating the social effects of the EU URBAN Community initiative programme. Eur. Plan. Stud. 11(2), 193–211 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sairinen, R., Kumpulainen, S.: Assessing social impacts in urban waterfront regeneration. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 26(1), 120–135 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hutton, T.A.: The new economy of the inner city. Cities 21(2), 89–108 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future. London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. SEU: Bringing national strategy for neighbourhood renewal. Social Exclusion Unit, HMSO, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scott, A.J.: The Cultural Economy of Cities: Essays on the Geography of Image-Producing Industries. Sage (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Byrne, D.: Industrial culture in a post-industrial world: the case of the North East of England. City 6(3), 279–289 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Florida, R.: The Rise of the Creative Class (2004 Paperback ed.) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Florida, R.: Cities and the Creative Class. Routledge, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Robson, B.: Culture and the city: a view from the “Athens of the North.” Built Environ. 30(3), 246–255 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.3.246.54298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Geddes, M.: Tackling social exclusion in the European Union? The limits to the new orthodoxy of local partnership. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 24(4), 782–800 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Haugh, H.M., Pardy, W.: Community entrepreneurship in north east Scotland, Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hamdi, N., Goethert, R.: Action Planning for Cities: A Guide to Community Practice. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor, M.: Unleashing the Potential: Bringing Residents to the Centre of Regeneration. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Barber, A., Hall, S.: Birmingham: whose urban renaissance? Regeneration as a response to economic restructuring. Policy Stud. 29(3), 281–292 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Raco, M., Henderson, S.: Flagship regeneration in a global city: the re-making of Paddington Basin. Urban Policy Res. 27(3), 301–314 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Darchen, S., Ladouceur, E.: Social sustainability in urban regeneration practice: a case study of the Fortitude Valley Renewal Plan in Brisbane. Aust. Plan. 50(4), 340–350 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2013.764909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Domšic, L.: Attitudes and perceptions of young local residents about the social impacts of the Špancirfest festival in Varaždin. Informatologia 48(3–4), 185–197 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  48. UNESCO: The UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, 2011. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002150/215084e.pdf#page=52. Accessed 20 Jun 2021

  49. Council of Europe: Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Faro, Portugal (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bullen, P.A., Love, P.E.D.: Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Struct. Surv. 29, 411–421 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Reed, R.G., Wilkinson, S.J.: The business case for incorporating sustainability in office buildings: the adaptive reuse of existing buildings. In: PRRES 2008: Investing in Sustainable Real Estate Environment: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society, pp. 1–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bullen, P.A., Love, P.E.D.: Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: learning from the experiences of Los Angeles, Struct. Surv. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Paiola, M.: Cultural events as potential drivers of urban regeneration: an empirical illustration. Ind. Innov. 15(5), 513–529 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Colantonio, A.: Social sustainability: an exploratory analysis of its definition, assessment methods metrics and tools (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  55. UN General Assembly: Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2021

  56. Fung, A., Wright, E.O.: Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, vol. 4. Verso (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cleaver, F.: Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4

  58. Pollock, V.L., Sharp, J.: Real participation or the tyranny of participatory practice? Public art and community involvement in the regeneration of the Raploch, Scotland. Urban Stud. 49(14), 3063–3079 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012439112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cerreta, M.: Thinking through complex values. In: Making Strategies in Spatial Planning. Springer, pp. 381–404 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kenter, J.O., et al.: Shared values and deliberative valuation: future directions. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 358–371 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cerreta, M., Panaro, S.: From perceived values to shared values: a multi-stakeholder spatial decision analysis (M-SSDA) for resilient landscapes. Sustainability 9(7), 1113 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Colantonio, A.: Urban social sustainability themes and assessment methods. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 163(2), 79–88 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2010.163.2.79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Glasson, J., Wood, G.: Urban regeneration and impact assessment for social sustainability. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 27(4), 283–290 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yusuf, S.A., Georgakis, P., Nwagboso, C.: Fuzzy logic based built environment impact assessment for urban regeneration simulation. In: 2009 Second International Conference in Visualisation, pp. 90–95 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ferilli, G., Sacco, P.L., Tavano Blessi, G.: Cities as creative hubs: From instrumental to functional values of culture-led local development, Sustain. City Creat. Farnham Ashgate, 245–270 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Boston, J.: The challenge of evaluating systemic change: the case of public management reform. Int. public Manag. J. 3(1), 23–46 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. United Nations: Draft Outcome Document of the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III), New York, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Srakar, A., Vecco, M.: Culture as a Fourth Dimension of Sustainable Development? A Statistical Analysis (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Fusco Girard, L.: Toward a smart sustainable development of port cities/areas: the role of the ‘historic urban landscape’ approach, Sustain 5(10), pp. 4329–4348 (2013), https://doi.org/10.3390/SU5104329

  70. Nocca, F., Fusco Girard, L.: Towards an integrated evaluation approach for cultural urban landscape conservation/regeneration, Region 5(1), 33–51 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Dalmas, L., Geronimi, V., Noël, J.-F., Sang, J.T.K.: Economic evaluation of urban heritage: an inclusive approach under a sustainability perspective. J. Cult. Herit. 16(5), 681–687 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Cerreta, M., Poli, G., Regalbuto, S., Mazzarella, C.: A Multi-dimensional Decision-Making Process for Regenerative Landscapes: A New Harbour for Naples (Italy). In: Misra, S., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2019. LNCS, vol. 11622, pp. 156–170. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  73. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: A multi-dimensional evaluation model for the historic urban landscape (HUL). In: ICOMOS International Conference Heritage and Landscape as Human Values. Conference Proceedings. Florence (Italy), pp. 302–306 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  74. ICOMOS: Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments for Cultural World Heritage properties, Paris (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Cerreta, M., Elefante, A., La Rocca, L.: A creative living lab for the adaptive reuse of the Morticelli Church: the SSMOLL project. Sustainability 12(24), 10561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ostrom, E.: Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Resour. J. 32 (1990). https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=4xg6oUobMz4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=elinor+ostrom&ots=aP5uBGlIWj&sig=T9o2yvZRGdgcuqoKZwmalAEfPYw. Accessed 18 Jul 2021

  77. Mangialardo, A., Micelli, E.: Social capital and public policies for commons: bottom-up processes in public real estate property valorisation. Elsevier 223, 175–180 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Putnam, R.D., Cartocci, R.: Capitale sociale e individualismo: crisi e rinascita della cultura civica in America. il Mulino (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Roberts, D., Woods, C.: Changing the World on a Shoestring: The Concept of Social Entrepreneurship,” Univ. Auckl. Bus. Rev. 7(1), 45–51 (2005). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242320433_Changing_the_World_on_a_Shoestring_The_Concept_of_Social_Entrepreneurship. Accessed 18 Jul 2021

  80. Venturi, P., Zandonai, F.: Imprese ibride: Modelli d’innovazione sociale per rigenerare valori. EGEA spa (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Duarte Alonso, A., Kok, S. K., O'Brien, S., O'Shea, M.: The significance of grassroots and inclusive innovation in harnessing social entrepreneurship and urban regeneration, Eur. Bus. Rev. 32(4), 667–686 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-05-2019-0102

  82. Ferilli, G., Sacco, P.L., Tavano Blessi, G., Forbici, S.: Power to the people: when culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not). Eur. Plan. Stud. 25(2), 241–258 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lichfield, N.: Community impact evaluation: principles and practice (2005). https://books.google.com/books?hl=it&lr=&id=mfaNAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=9nJvqxP7-O&sig=zR3VAhhQAQd4mt8oXmmcu4amfYg. Accessed 18 Jul 2021

  84. de Jonge, G., Sprij, A.: 10. In: 36 zieke kinderen, pp. 39–42. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-8424-2_10

  85. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M.: Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (2005). https://books.google.com/books?hl=it&lr=&id=YqmvlTiMNqYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=Figueira,+J.,+Greco,+S.,+%26+Ehrgott,+M.+(2005).+Multiple+criteria+decision+analysis:+State+of+the+art+surveys.+Boston,+Dordrecht,+London:+Springer+Verlag.&ots=34EX15mb1p&sig=77kCs. Accessed 18 Jul 2021

  86. Bielinskas, V., Burinskienė, M., Podviezko, A.: Choice of abandoned territories conversion scenario according to MCDA methods. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 24(1), 79–92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3846/JCEM.2018.303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Lee, J.: Spatial ethics as an evaluation tool for the long-term impacts of mega urban projects: an application of spatial ethics multi-criteria assessment to canning town regeneration projects, London. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 13(4), 541–555 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N4-541-555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. García, B.: Cultural policy and urban regeneration in western European cities: lessons from experience, prospects for the future. Local Econ. 19(4), 312–326 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0269094042000286828

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, via Toledo 402, 80134, Naples, Italy

    Maria Cerreta & Ludovica La Rocca

Authors
  1. Maria Cerreta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ludovica La Rocca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C. and L.L.R.; methodology, M.C. and L.L.R.; validation, M.C.; formal analysis, L.L.R.; investigation, L.L.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.R.; writing—review and editing, M.C. and L.L.R.; visualization, L.L.R.; supervision, M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cerreta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  4. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Chiara Garau

  5. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Ivan Blečić

  6. Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    David Taniar

  7. Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  8. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A. C. Rocha

  9. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Eufemia Tarantino

  10. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Carmelo Maria Torre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cerreta, M., La Rocca, L. (2021). Urban Regeneration Processes and Social Impact: A Literature Review to Explore the Role of Evaluation. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12954. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86978-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86979-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation