Skip to main content

Vulnerabilities and Open Issues of Smart Contracts: A Systematic Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Abstract

Smart Contracts (SCs) are programs stored in a Blockchain to ensure agreements between two or more parties. The combination of factors like the newness of the field, with less than a decade of practical use, and a high and growing popularity in industry, leads to an increase in the possibility of severe security issues occurrence. Even though, systems based on Blockchain and SCs technologies inherit several benefits, like a tamper-proof decentralized ledger and anonymous transactions. This way, even with security issues, the trend is that its popularity will increase. Due the unchangeable essence of Blockchain, failures or errors in SCs become perpetual once published, being critical to mitigate them, since the involvement of huge economic assets are common. To handle this, the academic and industrial communities have been expanding their efforts in this field, with a growth in research publications similar to exponential. Aiming at reasoning about the current state-of-art in vulnerabilities and open issues over Blockchain SCs, we conducted a systematic literature mapping over 32 primary and 18 secondary selected articles. As contribution, this work discusses and relates the selected papers, identifying gaps that may lead to research topics for future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this text, for a question of space and simplicity, we differentiate among 0) regular references, 1) primary studies (denoted with #) and 2) secondary studies (written with @). Regular references are available at the end of the text. In order to have access to the aforementioned primary and secondary studies, the reader must check the list of papers in https://bit.ly/3tNkIG6 [11].

  2. 2.

    http://www.scopus.com.

  3. 3.

    The address https://swcregistry.io/ has an updated list of known vulnerabilities.

References

  1. Alharby, M., Aldweesh, A., van Moorsel, A.: Blockchain-based smart contracts: a systematic mapping study of academic research (2018). In: 2018 International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data and Blockchain (ICCBB), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alt, L., Reitwiessner, C.: SMT-based verification of solidity smart contracts. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11247, pp. 376–388. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03427-6_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Argañaraz, M., Berón, M., Pereira, M.J., Henriques, P.: Detection of vulnerabilities in smart contracts specifications in ethereum platforms. In: 9th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2020), vol. 83, pp. 1–16. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buterin, V., et al.: Ethereum: a next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/%5BEnglish%5D-White-Paper7 (2014)

  5. Gelvez, M.: Explaining the DAO exploit for beginners in solidity (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jalali, S., Wohlin, C.: Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 29–38. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ji, T., Wu, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, X., Wang, Z.: The coming era of alphahacking? A survey of automatic software vulnerability detection, exploitation and patching techniques. In: 2018 IEEE third international conference on data science in cyberspace (DSC), pp. 53–60. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kalra, S., Goel, S., Dhawan, M., Sharma, S.: Zeus: analyzing safety of smart contracts. In: Ndss, pp. 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keele, S., et al.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Tech. rep, Citeseer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Brereton, O.P.: Using mapping studies as the basis for further research-a participant-observer case study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(6), 638–651 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumura, G.d.S., dos Santos, L.B.R., da Conceição, A.F., Vijaykumar, N.L.: Resulting articles: selected primary and related secondary papers. https://bit.ly/3tNkIG6 (2021)

  12. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Tech. rep, Manubot (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nikolić, I., Kolluri, A., Sergey, I., Saxena, P., Hobor, A.: Finding the greedy, prodigal, and suicidal contracts at scale. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 653–663 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schueffel, P., Groeneweg, N., Baldegger, R.: The crypto encyclopedia. Growth publisher, Tech. rep. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shen, Z., Chen, S.: A survey of automatic software vulnerability detection, program repair, and defect prediction techniques. Security and Communication Networks v2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Szabo, N.: Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First monday (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tolmach, P., Li, Y., Lin, S.W., Liu, Y., Li, Z.: A survey of smart contract formal specification and verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02712 (2020)

  18. Wood, G., et al.: Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Pap. 151(2014), 1–32 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, P., Xiao, F., Luo, X.: A framework and dataset for bugs in ethereum smart contracts. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp. 139–150. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Luciana Brasil Rebelo dos Santos , Arlindo Flavio da Conceição or Nandamudi Lankalapalli Vijaykumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Sousa Matsumura, G., dos Santos, L.B.R., Conceição, A.F.d., Vijaykumar, N.L. (2021). Vulnerabilities and Open Issues of Smart Contracts: A Systematic Mapping. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12952. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86973-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86973-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86972-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86973-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics