Skip to main content

Anonymity as a Threat to Academic Freedom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Academic Freedom in the European Context

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical University Studies ((PCU))

  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the threat posed to academic freedom by the use of anonymous judgments in the governance of science. In fact, most of the procedures that affect the day-to-day existence in academia are based on judgments or opinions expressed behind the cloak of anonymity. The latter has developed into a default rule whenever an assessment is required to inform decisions and actions in today’s academic system. Based on a thorough reading of Immanuel Kant the author shows how anonymous judgments violate the very nature and purpose of scientific dialogue and how anonymity operates as an instrument of control from inside the scientific dialogue and academic interchange. Its unquestioned adoption in the governance of science makes possible unprecedented, methodical, and systematic attacks to academic freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is at least the practice in Italy. See the example discussed below, Sect. 4.

  2. 2.

    By “academic existence” I mean simply a form of human existence devoted to knowledge and education.

  3. 3.

    “[W]e can reduce all acts of understanding to judgments, so that understanding may be represented as the faculty of judging. For it is, according to what has been said above, a faculty of thought.” (Kant 1781 A 69, 1787 B 84; translation mine). To judge means to connect a predicate to a subject in the form “S is P.” The truth of the thought corresponds to the correctness of the judgment.

  4. 4.

    “[…] for unless the surveyor’s judgment were first seen to be in perfect agreement with the judgment of all the other talented men who are working diligently in this field, even mathematics would not be exempt from the fear of falling into error somewhere along the line” (p. 11 in Kant (1798) 1974).

  5. 5.

    “By ‘public use of one’s reason’ I mean that use which each individual, as a scholar, makes of it before the reading public. I call ‘private use’ that which the individual can make of his reason in a civic position that has been entrusted to him” (see p. 55 in Kant (1784) 1964; translation mine).

  6. 6.

    Isaac Newton famously paraphrased Aristotle’s dictum into: Amicus Plato amicus Aristoteles magis amica veritas (“Plato is my friend, Aristotle is my friend, but my greatest friend is truth”). The sentence appears as exergue to the set of notes known as Quæstiones quædam Philosophiæ (text available from The Newton Project by the University of Oxford, http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk). A discussion of the transition of the meaning of “friendship” and “truth” from the Greek (Aristotelian) to the Modern (Newtonian) period is beyond the scope of this chapter. It suffices here to note the contentious continuity of the reference to truth among the philosophical and scientific traditions.

  7. 7.

    In the United States, it is now a widespread practice to hold “undergraduate conferences” (scholarly conferences open only to undergraduate students). In the United Kingdom, every university department must now have its own Student Review, with much the same apparatus of scientific journals, including peer review (anonymous, of course), open to students only.

  8. 8.

    “Credit” is easily translated into numerical and thus evaluative terms (n citations = X value = position Y in the scholarly community).

  9. 9.

    Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 10: “Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him”.

  10. 10.

    Guidelines on the prosecutor’s role in applications for Witness Anonymity Orders available at https://www.gov.uk.

  11. 11.

    Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person”.

  12. 12.

    In the History of the Common Law of England (1793), Sir Matthew Hale contrasted the English practice of taking evidence in public to the secrecy of the Spanish Inquisition. One of the reasons why public trials serve justice better than private or secret hearings is that “if the Judge be partial, his Partiality and Injustice will be evident to all By-standers” (cited at p. 28 in Nettheim 1984).

  13. 13.

    Famous examples in English literature include Jonathan Swift, Lewis Carroll, and Daniel Defoe. See Griffin (2003). Use of a pseudonym is not necessarily a sign of the desire to conceal one’s identity. There is none of this intention, for example, in the writings in which Kierkegaard uses the aliases “Climacus” and “Anti-Climacus”, or in Hölderlin’s so-called “tower poems”, which the poet signed as “Scardanelli” or “Salvator Rosa”.

  14. 14.

    For an overview of the AI systems currently used to “assist” peer-review, see Thelwall (2019). For an example of an AI system to evaluate “teaching performance” see Lieberman (2018).

References

  • Alcoholics Anonymous. 2011. Understanding Anonymity. https://www.aa.org/pages/en_us/understanding-anonymity. Accessed 2 February 2021.

  • Biagioli, Mario. 2002. From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review. Emergences. Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures 12 (1): 11–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Lynn Z. 2008. The Seven Faces of Anonymity in Academe. symplokē 16 (1/2): 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coroners and Justice Act. 2009. Part 3, Chapter 2. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/part/3/chapter/2. Accessed 2 February 2021.

  • De Gennaro, Ivo, and Gino Zaccaria. 2011. La dittatura del valore. L’insegnamento e la ricerca nell’università planetaria. / The Dictatorship of Value. Teaching and Research in the Planetary University. Milan: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR). Article 9. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-9-gdpr/. Accessed 2 February 2021.

  • Griffin, Robert J., ed. 2003. The Faces of Anonymity: Anonymous and Pseudonymous Publication from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. (1784) 1964. Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? In Werkausgabe. Band XI: Schriften zur Anthropologie, Geschichtsphilosophie, Politik und Pädagogik 1, ed. Wilhelm Weischedel, 53–61. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (1786) 1964. Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren? In Werkausgabe. Band V: Schriften zur Metaphysik und Logik 1, ed. Wilhelm Weischedel, 265–283. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (1781) (A), (1787) (B), 1964. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In Werkausgabe. Bände III/IV, ed. Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (1798) 1974. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Mary J. Gregor. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Mark. 2018. AI + Student Evaluations = the Future? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/03/07/hubert-ai-helps-instructors-sort-and-process-student-evaluation. Accessed 2 February 2021.

  • Muller, Jerry Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nettheim, Garth. 1984. The Principle of Open Justice. University of Tasmania Law Review 8: 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac. Quæstiones quædam Philosophiæ (“Certain Philosophical Questions”, MS Add. 3996, Cambridge University Library). The Newton Project. University of Oxford. http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00092. Accessed 2 February 2021.

  • Suls, Jerry, and René Martin. 2009. The Air We Breathe. A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4 (1): 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, Mike. 2019. Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Peer Review. JISC. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7614. Accessed 2 February 2021.

  • Tommaseo, Niccolò, and Giovanni Pietro Vieusseux. 1956. Carteggio inedito. Edited by Raffaele Ciampini and Petre Ciureanu (Storia e letteratura. Raccolta di studi e testi 61). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e letteratura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed 2 February 2021.

  • Weil, Simone. 1952. The Need for Roots. Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind. Translated by Arthur Wills. With a Preface by T.S. Eliot. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. On the Abolition of All Political Parties. Translated by Simon Leys. Melbourne: Black Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Borghi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borghi, M. (2022). Anonymity as a Threat to Academic Freedom. In: De Gennaro, I., Hofmeister, H., Lüfter, R. (eds) Academic Freedom in the European Context. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86931-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86931-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86930-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86931-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics