Skip to main content

Nanomaterials to Improve Bio-Oil from Biomass Pyrolysis: State-Of-Art and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Applications of Nanomaterials

Part of the book series: Engineering Materials ((ENG.MAT.))

  • 604 Accesses

Abstract

Catalytic pyrolysis is a thermochemical conversion process that has emerged as a suitable technology for converting biomass into energy vectors. Among the energy vectors, the production of bio-oil stands out, which can represent an intermediate product of great value for industry, in particular for biorefineries, where it can be integrated in co-processing for the synthesis of liquid fuels, or in the synthesis of others chemical products of commercial interest. However, the feasibility of biomass pyrolysis is conditioned by the limited efficiency and quality of the bio-oils obtained, especially by the formation of corrosive oxygen compounds and the high water content. Therefore, it is essential to explore pyrolysis technologies and catalytic pyrolysis concepts, with low cost catalysts, in order to increase oil yield and suppress the formation of undesirable compounds. Thus, the development and application of different catalytic materials have been explored with the objective of promoting the improvement of yield and quality of bio-oil. Among the methods applied, the catalytic cracking of biomass pyrolysis vapors stands out. The influence of catalysts on the composition and yield of pyrolysis products, particularly bio-oil, is directly related to the characteristics of the catalytic materials. For example, specific surface area, number of active sites, pore size, particle size are among the characteristics that most influence the performance of the material catalytic activity. Therefore, particular attention is focused on materials with improved properties, such as nanomaterials. In this context, this chapter presents a review on the development and application of several classes of materials in catalytic pyrolysis processes and technology, their properties and its influence on the bio-oil production and characteristics, with particular emphasis on nanomaterials. Relevant aspects on challenges and future perspectives in the development and application of nanomaterials as catalysts in pyrolysis processes are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACBS:

Aesculus chinesis Bunge Seed

BBNs:

Biochar-based nanocatalysts

BTX:

Benzene, tuluene, xylene

CFB:

Circulating fluidized bed

DSC:

Diferential Scanning Calometry

ENSYN:

Ensyn Technologies, Inc.

FeHC@hydrochar:

Ferro rice husk hydrochar

FeHC+WI@hydrochar:

Ferro rice husk hydrochar wet impregnation

FeWI@biochar:

Ferro wet impregnation biochar

FP:

Fast pyrolysis

GC–MS:

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

HTC:

Hydrothermal carbonization

HDO:

Hydrodeoxygenation

IP:

Intermediate pyrolysis

Nm:

Nanometer

NREL:

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

SP:

Slow pyrolysis

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

TG-FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

wt:

Weight

References

  1. Roy, P., Dias, G.: Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 77, 59–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.136

  2. Qureshi, K.M., Kay Lup, A.N., Khan, S., Abnisa, F., Wan Daud, W.M.A.: A technical review on semi-continuous and continuous pyrolysis process of biomass to bio-oil. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 131, 52–75 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.02.010

  3. Meier, D., van de Beld, B., Bridgwater, A.V., Elliott, D.C., Oasmaa, A., Preto, F.: State-of-the-art of fast pyrolysis in IEA bioenergy member countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 20, 619–641 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.061.

  4. Dhyani, V., Bhaskar, T.: A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew. Energy 129, 695–716 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.035

  5. Mattos, C., Veloso, M.C.C., Romeiro, G.A., Folly, E.: Biocidal applications trends of bio-oils from pyrolysis: characterization of several conditions and biomass, a review. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 139, 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.12.029s

  6. Cantrell, K.B., Hunt, P.G., Uchimiya, M., Novak, J.M., Ro, K.S.: Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 107, 419–428 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.084

  7. Bhoi, P.R., Ouedraogo, A.S., Soloiu, V., Quirino, R.: Recent advances on catalysts for improving hydrocarbon compounds in bio-oil of biomass catalytic pyrolysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 121, 109676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109676

  8. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D.H., Zheng, C.: Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86(12), 1781–1788 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013

  9. Hu, X., Gholizadeh, M.: Biomass pyrolysis: a review of the process development and challenges from initial researches up to the commercialisation stage. J. Energy Chem. 39, 109–143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.024.

  10. Garcia-Nunez, J.A.: Historical developments of pyrolysis reactors: a review. Energy Fuels 31(6), 5751–5775 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00641.

  11. Homagain, K., Shahi, C., Luckai, N., Sharma, M.: Biochar-based bioenergy and its environmental impact in Northwestern Ontario Canada: a review. J. For. Res. 25(4), 737–748 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0522-6

  12. Kan, T., Strezov, V., Evans, T.J.: Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57, 1126–1140 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185.

  13. Bridgwater, A.V.: Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 91(2), 87–102 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00142-0.

  14. Isahak, W.N.R.W., Hisham, M.W.M., Yarmo, M.A., Yun Hin, T.-Y.: A review on bio-oil production from biomass by using pyrolysis method. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(8), 5910–5923 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.039.

  15. No, S.-Y.: Application of bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass to transportation, heat and power generation—a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 40, 1108–1125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.127

  16. Yang, Z., Kumar, A., Huhnke, R.L.: Review of recent developments to improve storage and transportation stability of bio-oil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50, 859–870 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.025.

  17. Mortensen, P.M., Grunwaldt, J.-D., Jensen, P.A., Knudsen, K.G., Jensen, A.D.: A review of catalytic upgrading of bio-oil to engine fuels. Appl. Catal. A General 407(1), 1–19 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.046.

  18. Scholze, B., Meier, D.: Characterization of the water-insoluble fraction from pyrolysis oil (pyrolytic lignin). Part I. PY–GC/MS, FTIR, and functional groups. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 60(1), 41–54 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00110-8

  19. Zhang, Q., Chang, J., Wang, T., Xu, Y.: Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energy Conv. Manage. 48(1), 87–92 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.010

  20. Rezaei, P.S., Shafaghat, H., Daud, W.M.A.W.: Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic cracking of oxygenate compounds derived from biomass pyrolysis: a review. Appl. Catal. A General 469, 490–511 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.09.036

  21. Lu, Q., Li, W.-Z., Zhu, X.-F.: Overview of fuel properties of biomass fast pyrolysis oils. Energy Conv. Manage. 50(5), 1376–1383 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.01.001

  22. Shihadeh, A., Hochgreb, S.: Impact of biomass pyrolysis oil process conditions on ignition delay in compression ignition engines. Energy Fuels 16(3), 552–561 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef010094d

  23. Zhang, H., et al.: Biomass fast pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor under N2, CO2, CO, CH4 and H2 atmospheres. Biores. Technol. 102(5), 4258–4264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.075

  24. Oasmaa, A., Kuoppala, E.: Fast pyrolysis of forestry residue. 3. Storage stability of liquid fuel. Energy Fuels 17(4), 1075–1084 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef030011o

  25. Wang, J.-J., Chang, J., Fan, J.: Upgrading of bio-oil by catalytic esterification and determination of acid number for evaluating esterification degree. Energy Fuels 24(5), 3251–3255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1000634.

  26. Mendes, M.J., Santos, O.A.A., Jordão, E., Silva, A.M.: Hydrogenation of oleic acid over ruthenium catalysts. Appl. Catal. A General 217(1), 253–262 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00613-5

  27. Chen, X., et al.: Recent developments in lignocellulosic biomass catalytic fast pyrolysis: strategies for the optimization of bio-oil quality and yield. Fuel Process. Technol. 196, 106180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106180.

  28. Özsin, G.: Pütün, A.E.: A comparative study on co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene, and polyvinyl chloride: Synergistic effects and product characteristics. J. Cleaner Prod. 205, 1127–1138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.134

  29. Jamil, F., Ahmad, M.M., Yusup, S., Abdullah, B.: Upgrading of bio-oil from palm kernel shell by catalytic cracking in the presence of HZSM-5. Int. J. Green Energy 13(4), 424–429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.966370

  30. Stefanidis, S.D., Kalogiannis, K.G., Lappas, A.A.: Co-processing bio-oil in the refinery for drop-in biofuels via fluid catalytic cracking. WIREs Energy and Environ. 7(3), e281 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.281

  31. Furimsky, E.: Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation. Appl. Catal. A General 199(2), 147–190 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00555-4

  32. Cheng, Y.-T., Wang, Z., Gilbert, C.J., Fan, W., Huber, G.W.: Production of p-Xylene from biomass by catalytic fast pyrolysis using ZSM-5 catalysts with reduced pore openings. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51(44), 11097–11100 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201205230

  33. Bridgwater, A.V.: Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 38, 68–94 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048

  34. Wang, K., Dayton, D.C., Peters, J.E., Mante, O.D.: Reactive catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass to produce high-quality bio-crude. Green Chem 19(14), 3243–3251 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7GC01088E

  35. Artetxe, M., Lopez, G., Amutio, M., Elordi, G., Bilbao, J., Olazar, M.: Light olefins from HDPE cracking in a two-step thermal and catalytic process. Chem. Eng. J. 207–208, 27–34 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.105

  36. Aguado, J., Serrano, D.P., San Miguel, G., Castro, M.C., Madrid, S.: Feedstock recycling of polyethylene in a two-step thermo-catalytic reaction system. J.Analyt. Appl. Pyroly. 79(1), 415–423 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2006.11.008

  37. Bezerra, F.A., Figueiredo, A.L., de Araujo, A.S., de Guedes, A.P.M.A.: Pirólise catalítica do PEBD usando como catalisador a vermiculita modificada TT—Catalytic pyrolysis of LDPE using modified vermiculite as a catalyst. Polímeros 26(spe), 55–59, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.1761

  38. Jae, J., et al.: Investigation into the shape selectivity of zeolite catalysts for biomass conversion. J. Catal. 279(2), 257–268 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.01.019

  39. Tan, S., Zhang, Z., Sun, J., Wang, Q.: Recent progress of catalytic pyrolysis of biomass by HZSM-5. Chinese J. Catal. 34(4), 641–650 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60531-2

  40. Zheng, A., et al.: Effect of crystal size of ZSM-5 on the aromatic yield and selectivity from catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 383–384, 23–30 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2013.11.005

  41. Dai, G., Wang, S., Zou, Q., Huang, S.: Improvement of aromatics production from catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose over metal-modified hierarchical HZSM-5. Fuel Process. Technol. 179, 319–323 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.07.023

  42. Liu, C., Wang, H., Karim, A.M., Sun, J., Wang, Y.: Catalytic fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(22), 7594–7623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60414D

  43. Wang, K., Ho Kim, K., Brown, R.C.: Catalytic pyrolysis of individual components of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 16(2), 727–735 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3GC41288A

  44. Sun, L., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Zhao, B., Yang, S., Xie, X.: Comparision of catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass to aromatic hydrocarbons over ZSM-5 and Fe/ZSM-5 catalysts. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 121, 342–346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.08.015

  45. Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Lou, H.: In situ catalytic conversion of biomass fast pyrolysis vapors on HZSM‑5. J. Energy Chem. 25(3), 427–433 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.03.014

  46. Hu, C., Xiao, R., Zhang, H.: Ex-situ catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass over HZSM-5 in a two-stage fluidized-bed/fixed-bed combination reactor. Biores. Technol. 243, 1133–1140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.011

  47. Stefanidis, S.D., et al.: Natural magnesium oxide (MgO) catalysts: A cost-effective sustainable alternative to acid zeolites for the in situ upgrading of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 196, 155–173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.031

  48. Wang, D., Xiao, R., Zhang, H., He, G.: Comparison of catalytic pyrolysis of biomass with MCM-41 and CaO catalysts by using TGA–FTIR analysis. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 89(2), 171–177 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.008

  49. Chen, X., Chen, Y., Yang, H., Chen, W., Wang, X., Chen, H.: Fast pyrolysis of cotton stalk biomass using calcium oxide. Biores. Technol. 233, 15–20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.070

  50. Deoxygenation of bio-oil during pyrolysis of biomass in the presence of CaO in a fluidized-bed reactor | energy & fuels. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ef1009605. Acessado 21 Mar 2021

  51. Pütün, E.: Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: effects of pyrolysis temperature, sweeping gas flow rate and MgO catalyst. Energy 35(7), 2761–2766 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.024

  52. Sun, L., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Zhao, B., Yang, S., Xie, X.: Effects of Fe contents on fast pyrolysis of biomass with Fe/CaO catalysts. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 119, 133–138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.03.008

  53. Zhang, X., et al.: Comparison of catalytic upgrading of biomass fast pyrolysis vapors over CaO and Fe(III)/CaO catalysts. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 108, 35–40 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.05.020

  54. Ozbay, N., Yargic, A.S., Yarbay Sahin, R.Z.: Tailoring Cu/Al2O3 catalysts for the catalytic pyrolysis of tomato waste. J. Energy Inst. 91(3), 424–433 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.01.010

  55. Torri, C., Reinikainen, M., Lindfors, C., Fabbri, D., Oasmaa, A., Kuoppala, E.: Investigation on catalytic pyrolysis of pine sawdust: catalyst screening by Py-GC-MIP-AED. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 88(1), 7–13 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.02.005

  56. Oasmaa, A., Czernik, S.: Fuel oil quality of biomass pyrolysis oilsstate of the art for the end users. Energy Fuels 13(4), 914–921 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef980272b

  57. Persson, H., Duman, I., Wang, S., Pettersson, L.J., Yang, W.: Catalytic pyrolysis over transition metal-modified zeolites: a comparative study between catalyst activity and deactivation. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 138, 54–61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.12.005

  58. Moud, P.H., Kantarelis, E., Andersson, K.J., Engvall, K.: Biomass pyrolysis gas conditioning over an iron-based catalyst for mild deoxygenation and hydrogen production. Fuel 211, 149–158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.062

  59. Olcese, R.N., Francois, J., Bettahar, M.M., Petitjean, D., Dufour, A.: Hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol, a surrogate of lignin pyrolysis vapors, over iron based catalysts: kinetics and modeling of the lignin to aromatics integrated process. Energy Fuels 27(2), 975–984 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301971a

  60. Sonoyama, N., et al.: Production of chemicals by cracking pyrolytic tar from Loy Yang coal over iron oxide catalysts in a steam atmosphere. Fuel Process. Technol. 92(4), 771–775 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.09.036

  61. Campelo, J.M., Luna, D., Luque, R., Marinas, J.M., Romero, A.A.: Sustainable preparation of supported metal nanoparticles and their applications in catalysis. ChemSusChem 2(1), 18–45 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.200800227

  62. Wang, Y., De, S., Yan, N.: Rational control of nano-scale metal-catalysts for biomass conversion. Chem. Commun. 52(37), 6210–6224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CC00336B

  63. Mintova, S., Jaber, M., Valtchev, V.: Nanosized microporous crystals: emerging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00210a

  64. Li, Y., et al.: Pyrolysis of Aesculus chinensis Bunge Seed with Fe2O3/NiO as nanocatalysts for the production of bio-oil material. J. Hazard. Mater. 126012 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126012

  65. Balasubramanian, S., Wang, P., Schaller, R.D., Rajh, T., Rozhkova, E.A.: High-Performance bioassisted nanophotocatalyst for hydrogen production. Nano Lett. 13(7), 3365–3371 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4016655

  66. Carenco, S., et al.: Nickel phosphide nanocatalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of alkynes. Nano Today 7(1), 21–28 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2011.12.003

  67. Sudarsanam, P., Peeters, E., Makshina, E.V., Parvulescu, V.I., Sels, B.F.: Advances in porous and nanoscale catalysts for viable biomass conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48(8), 2366–2421 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00452H

  68. Gökdai, Z., Sınağ, A., Yumak, T.: Comparison of the catalytic efficiency of synthesized nano tin oxide particles and various catalysts for the pyrolysis of hazelnut shell. Biomass Bioenergy 34(3), 402–410 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.12.003

  69. Ngo, H.L., Nuñez, A., Lin, W., Foglia, T.A.: Zeolite-catalyzed isomerization of oleic acid to branched-chain isomers. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 109(3), 214–224 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600246

  70. Li, J., Xiao, B., Du, L., Yan, R., Liang, T.D.: Preparation of nano-NiO particles and evaluation of their catalytic activity in pyrolyzing cellulose. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 36(1), 42–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(08)60010-9

  71. Wang, D., Yang, P., Ma, Q., Cao, Y., Zhang, A., Huang, B.: Micro- and nano-structures of iron oxide with tunable morphologies fabricated via solvothermal process. CrystEngComm 15(44), 8959–8965 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CE41085D

  72. Tosoni, S., Chen, H.-Y. T., Ruiz Puigdollers, A., Pacchioni, G.: TiO2 and ZrO2 in biomass conversion: why catalyst reduction helps. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 376(2110), 20170056 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0056

  73. Rogers, K.A., Zheng, Y.: Selective Deoxygenation of Biomass-derived bio-oils within hydrogen-modest environments: a review and new insights. ChemSusChem 9(14), 1750–1772 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600144

  74. Decostanzi, M., Auvergne, R., Boutevin, B., Caillol, S.: Biobased phenol and furan derivative coupling for the synthesis of functional monomers. Green Chem. 21(4),724–747 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8GC03541E

  75. Lu, Q., Dong, C., Zhang, X., Tian, H., Yang, Y., Zhu, X.: Selective fast pyrolysis of biomass impregnated with ZnCl2 to produce furfural: analytical Py-GC/MS study. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 90(2), 204–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.12.007

  76. Mian, M.M., Liu, G.: Sewage sludge-derived TiO2/Fe/Fe3C-biochar composite as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for degradation of methylene blue. Chemosphere 215, 101–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.027.

  77. Wang, F., et al.: Simultaneous phase and size control of upconversion nanocrystals through lanthanide doping. Nature 463(7284), 1061–1065 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08777

  78. Bai, X., et al.: Preparation of furfural by catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose based on nano Na/Fe-solid acid. Fuel 258, 116089 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116089

  79. Guo, F., Jia, X., Liang, S., Zhou, N., Chen, P., Ruan, R.: Development of biochar-based nanocatalysts for tar cracking/reforming during biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Biores. Technol. 298, 122263 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122263

  80. Védrine, J.C.: Heterogeneous catalysis on metal oxides. Catalysts 7(11), (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7110341

  81. Dong, Y. et al.: Application of low-cost Fe-based catalysts in the microwave-assisted pyrolysis of macroalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for the upgradation of bio-oil. Fuel 300, 120944 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120944

  82. Murata, K., Kreethawate, L., Larpkiattaworn, S., Inaba, M.: Evaluation of Ni-based catalysts for the catalytic fast pyrolysis of jatropha residues. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 118, 308–316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.02.014.

  83. Murata, K., Khongwong, W., Larpkattaworn, S., Liu, Y., Inaba, M., Takahara, I.: Evaluation of PtPd-modified zeolite catalysts (ZSM-5, beta, USY) for pyrolysis of Jatropha Waste. J. Jpn. Pet. Inst. 57(3), 133–145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1627/jpi.57.133

  84. Lu, Q. et al.: Experimental study on catalytic pyrolysis of biomass over a Ni/Ca-promoted Fe catalyst. Fuel 263, 116690 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116690

  85. Dai, L. et al.: Synthesis of iron nanoparticles-based hydrochar catalyst for ex-situ catalytic microwave-assisted pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to renewable phenols. Fuel 279, 118532 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118532

  86. Guo, F., Peng, K., Liang, S., Jia, X., Jiang, X., Qian, L.: One-step synthesis of biomass activated char supported copper nanoparticles for catalytic cracking of biomass primary tar. Energy 180, 584–593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.115

  87. Donar, Y.O., Sınağ, A.: Catalytic effect of tin oxide nanoparticles on cellulose pyrolysis. J. Analyt. Appl. Pyrol. 119, 69–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.03.016

  88. Atanda, L., et al.: Hybridization of ZSM-5 with spinel oxides for biomass vapour upgrading. ChemCatChem 12(5), 1403–1412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201902023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhang, H., Xiao, R., Jin, B., Xiao, G., Chen, R.: Biomass catalytic pyrolysis to produce olefins and aromatics with a physically mixed catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 140, 256–262. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.094

  90. Che, Q. et al.: Aromatics production with metal oxides and ZSM-5 as catalysts in catalytic pyrolysis of wood sawdust. Fuel Process. Technol. 188, p. 146–152, jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.02.016.

  91. Abu-Dief, A.M., Abdel-Fatah, S.M.: Development and functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles as powerful and green catalysts for organic synthesis. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 7(1), 55–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2017.05.008

  92. Zhang, Z., Li, K., Ma, S., Cui, M., Lu, Q., Yang, Y.: Fast pyrolysis of biomass catalyzed by magnetic solid base catalyst in a hydrogen atmosphere for selective production of phenol. Ind. Crops Prod. 137, 495–500 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.066

  93. Tripathy, A., Nine, M.J., Silva, F.S.: Biosensing platform on ferrite magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, functionalization, mechanism and applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 290, 102380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102380.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Human Resources Program of the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (PRH-ANP 13.1; grant number 042319) and the Coordination for Improvement in Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the financial support. Thanks are due to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)/Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (MCTES) for the financial support to CESAM (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020), through national funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hauschild, T., da Cruz Tarelho, L.A., Bergmann, C.P., Basegio, T.M. (2022). Nanomaterials to Improve Bio-Oil from Biomass Pyrolysis: State-Of-Art and Challenges. In: Kopp Alves, A. (eds) Environmental Applications of Nanomaterials. Engineering Materials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86822-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics