Abstract
Empathy is a fundamental competency for daily communication, interaction, and teamwork, and thus most relevant for future jobs. Nevertheless, educational organizations are limited in providing the necessary conditions for students to develop empathy skills, due to traditional large-scale and distance-learning scenarios. In this paper, we present insights on how to design an adaptive learning tool that helps students to develop their ability to react to other people’s observed experiences through individual feedback independent of an instructor, time and location. Based on theoretical insights of 110 papers and 28 user interviews, we propose preliminary design principles for an adaptive empathy learning tool. Moreover, we evaluate the design principles as an instantiated prototype in a proof-of-concept evaluation with 25 students. The results indicate that an empathy learning tool based on the presented design knowledge seems to be a promising approach to help students to improve their empathy skills in different learning scenarios.
Keywords
- Empathy learning
- Adaptive skill learning
- Cognitive dissonance theory
- Design science research
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options



Notes
- 1.
- 2.
References
OECD: The Future of Education and Skills - Education 2030 (2018). 2018-06-15
Davis, M.H.: Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44, 113–126 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.113
Luca, J., Tarricone, P.: Does emotional intelligence affect successful teamwork? In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, pp. 367–376 (2001)
Poser, M., Bittner, E.A.C.: Hybrid teamwork: consideration of teamwork concepts to reach naturalistic interaction between humans and conversational agents. In: WI2020. GITO Verlag (2020). https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_a6-poser
Konrath, S.H., O’Brien, E.H., Hsing, C.: Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 15, 180–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395
Lok, B., Foster, A.E.: Can virtual humans teach empathy? In: Foster, A.E., Yaseen, Z.S. (eds.) Teaching Empathy in Healthcare, pp. 143–163. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29876-0_9
Seaman, J.E., Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: Higher Education Reports - Babson Survey Research Group (2018)
Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of Feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 81–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1980)
Wambsganss, T., Söllner, M., Leimeister, J.M.: Design and evaluation of an adaptive dialog-based tutoring system for argumentation skills. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Hyderabad, India (2020)
Wambsganss, T., Rietsche, R.: Towards designing an adaptive argumentation learning tool. In: 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019), pp. 1–9. Munich (2020)
Gerdes, K.E., Segal, E.A., Jackson, K.F., Mullins, J.L.: Teaching empathy: a framework rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. J. Soc. Work Educ. 47, 109–131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900085
Santos, B.S., Junior, M.C., De Souza, J.G.: An experimental evaluation of the neuromessenger: a collaborative tool to improve the empathy of text interactions. In: Proceedings. 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, 2018 June, pp. 573–579 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2018.8538442
Zierau, N., Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., Schöbel, S., Leimeister, J.M.: The anatomy of user experience with conversational agents : a taxonomy and propositions of service clues. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp. 1–17 (2020)
Landolt, S., Wambsganss, T., Matthias, S.: A taxonomy for deep learning in natural language processing. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2021)
Buechel, S., Buffone, A., Slaff, B., Ungar, L., Sedoc, J.: Modeling empathy and distress in reaction to news stories. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2018), pp. 4758–4765 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1507
Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 1–6 (2007)
Festinger, L.: Cognitive dissonance. Sci. Am. 207, 93–106 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Des. Sci. IS Res. MIS Q. 28, 75 (2004)
Wambsganss, T., et al.: An adaptive learning support system for argumentation skills. In: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2020)
Peterson, R.T., Limbu, Y.: The convergence of mirroring and empathy: communications training in business-to-business personal selling persuasion efforts. J. Bus.-to-bus. Mark. 16, 193–219 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10517120802484551
vom Brocke, J., Maaß, W., Buxmann, P., Maedche, A., Leimeister, J.M., Pecht, G.: Future work and enterprise systems. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(4), 357–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0544-2
Decety, J., Jackson, P.L.: The functional architecture of human empathy (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
Lawrence, E.J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., David, A.S.: Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychol. Med. 34, 911–919 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001624
Spreng, R.N., McKinnon, M.C., Mar, R.A., Levine, B.: The Toronto empathy questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J. Pers. Assess. 91, 62–71 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381
Bell, H.: Creative interventions for teaching empathy in the counseling classroom. J. Creat. Ment. Heal. 13, 106–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2017.1328295
Hen, M., Goroshit, M.: Emotional competencies in the education of mental health professionals. Soc. Work Educ. 30, 811–829 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.515680
Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Lundblad, N., Jin, M.: The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. J. Learn. Sci. 7, 102–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793141
Weis, S., Süß, H.-M.: Social intelligence—a review and critical discussion of measurement concepts. In: Schulze, R., Roberts, R.D. (eds.) Emotional Intelligence. An International Handbook, pp. 203–230. Gottingen, Hogrefe (2005)
Sadler, D.R.: Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr. Sci. 18, 119–144 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Kralicek, D., Von Rabenau, L., Shelar, S., Blikstein, P.: Inside out: teaching empathy and social-emotional skills. In: IDC 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 525–528. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3213525
Elliot, A.J., Devine, P.G.: On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: dissonance as psychological discomfort. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 382–394 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
Piaget, J., Brown, T., Thampy, K.J.: The equilibration of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development. Am. J. Educ. 94, 574–577 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1086/443876
Gläser, J., Laudel, G.: Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. VS Verlag für Sozialwiss (2010)
Gregor, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S.: The anatomy of a design principle. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (Forthcoming, 2020)
Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25, 77–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36
Cooper, H.M.: Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowl. Soc. 1, 104–126 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177550
vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 205–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03709
Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., Hay, K.E.: Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions 1, 36–48 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/174809.174813
Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P.: Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 285–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3
Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied For Agile Software Development (2004)
Wambsganss, T., Niklaus, C., Söllner, M., Handschuh, S., Leimeister, J.M.: A corpus for argumentative writing support in German. In: 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling) (2020)
Wambsganss, T., Molyndris, N., Söllner, M.: Unlocking transfer learning in argumentation mining: a domain-independent modelling approach. In: 15th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. , Potsdam, Germany (2020). https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_c9-wambsganss
Wambsganss, T., Winkler, R., Schmid, P., Söllner, M.: Unleashing the potential of conversational agents for course evaluations: empirical insights from a comparison with web surveys. In: Twenty-Eighth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2020), pp. 1–18. , Marrakesh, Morocco (2020)
Wambsganss, T., Winkler, R., Schmid, P., Söllner, M.: Designing a conversational agent as a formative course evaluation tool. In: 15th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Potsdam, Germany (2020)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wambsganss, T., Weber, F., Söllner, M. (2021). Designing an Adaptive Empathy Learning Tool. In: Ahlemann, F., Schütte, R., Stieglitz, S. (eds) Innovation Through Information Systems. WI 2021. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86789-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86790-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)