Abstract
The terms that constitute Ideality in TRIZ are extremely appropriate to characterize the conflicting prerogatives of value/functionality, and environmental sustainability and human wellbeing. In a system perspective, the latter are mostly ascribable to harmful functions and consumption of resources. The paper introduces a classification of sustainable design initiatives based on the variations of the factors that contribute to Ideality. The classification urges designers to think of possible win-win solutions in which functionalities are not jeopardized by the search for more environmental-friendly solutions. Combining ideality and sustainability is a trigger towards making sustainable solutions more accepted, and, consequently, more effective in preserving the environment. In particular, the individuation of classes of sustainable design endeavors lay bare that the potential reduction of harmful effects is not a sufficient precondition to create sustainable products. Overall, TRIZ, along with its underlying theory and constructs, has proven to provide an effective key of reading for approaching the eco-design field in terms of the extent to which new products and solutions are promising.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brundtland, G.H.: World commission on environment and development. Environ. Policy Law 14(1), 26–30 (1985)
Schmidheiny, S., Timberlake, L.: Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Livotov, P., Sekaran, A.P.C., Law, R., Reay, D., Sarsenova, A., Sayyareh, S.: Eco-innovation in process engineering: contradictions, inventive principles and methods. Therm. Sci. Eng. Progress 9, 52–65 (2019)
Russo, D., Schöfer, M., Bersano, G.: Supporting ECO-innovation in SMEs by TRIZ Eco-guidelines. Procedia Eng. 131, 831–839 (2015)
Russo, D., Rizzi, C., Spreafico, C.: How to build guidelines for eco-improvement. In: Campana, G., Howlett, R.J., Setchi, R., Cimatti, B. (eds.) SDM 2017. SIST, vol. 68, pp. 879–887. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_82
Russo, D., Spreafico, C.: TRIZ-based guidelines for eco-improvement. Sustainability 12(8), 3412 (2020)
Tyl, B., Legardeur, J., Millet, D., Vallet, F.: A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools. J. Eng. Des. 25(10–12), 325–345 (2014)
Bogatyrev, N., Bogatyreva, O.: BioTRIZ: a win-win methodology for eco-innovation. In: Azevedo, S.G., Brandenburg, M., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V. (eds.) Eco-innovation and the Development of Business Models. GINS, vol. 2, pp. 297–314. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05077-5_15
Bocken, N.M.P., Allwood, J.M., Willey, A.R., King, J.M.H.: Development of an eco-ideation tool to identify stepwise greenhouse gas emissions reduction options for consumer goods. J. Clean. Prod. 19(12), 1279–1287 (2011)
López-Forniés, I., Sierra-Pérez, J., Boschmonart-Rives, J., Gabarrell, X.: Metric for measuring the effectiveness of an eco-ideation process. J. Clean. Prod. 162, 865–874 (2017)
Russo, D., Serafini, M., Rizzi, C.: Is TRIZ an ecodesign method? In: Setchi, R., Howlett, R.J., Liu, Y., Theobald, P. (eds.) Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2016. SIST, vol. 52, pp. 525–535. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32098-4_45
Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y., Rotini, F.: Sustainability as a value-adding concept in the early design phases? Insights from stimulated ideation sessions. In: Campana, G., Howlett, R.J., Setchi, R., Cimatti, B. (eds.) SDM 2017. SIST, vol. 68, pp. 888–897. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_83
Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y.: Investigating the value perception of specific TRIZ solutions aimed to reduce product’s environmental impact. In: Benmoussa, R., De Guio, R., Dubois, S., Koziołek, S. (eds.) TFC 2019. IAICT, vol. 572, pp. 282–294. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32497-1_23
Borgianni, Y., Cardillo, A., Cascini, G., Rotini, F.: Systematizing new value proposition through a TRIZ-based classification of functional features. Procedia Eng. 9, 103–118 (2011)
Petrov, V., Seredinski, A.: Progress and ideality. In: TRIZ Future Conference, pp. 1–8 (2005)
Russo, D.: TRIZ-driven eco-design and Innovation. In: ICORD 2009: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research into Design, Bangalore, India, pp. 105–112. Design Society, Glasgow (2009)
Russo, D., Regazzoni, D., Montecchi, T.: Eco-design with TRIZ laws of evolution. Procedia Eng. 9, 311–322 (2011)
Becattini, N., Cascini, G., Rotini, F.: Correlations between the evolution of contradictions and the law of identity increase. Procedia Eng. 9, 236–250 (2011)
Borgianni, Y., Rotini, F.: Predicting the competitive advantage of design projects to dynamically support decisions in product development. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 20(5), 355–381 (2015)
Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y., Pigosso, D.C.: Can the choice of eco-design principles affect products’ success?. Des. Sci. 5, e25 (2019)
Kim, W.C., Mauborgne, R.A.: Blue Ocean Strategy, Expanded Edition: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press, Brighton (2014)
Cascini, G.: TRIZ-based anticipatory design of future products and processes. J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci. 16(3), 29–63 (2012)
Maccioni, L., Bietresato, M., Borgianni, Y.: From the extraction of currently fulfilled requirements to value curves: a case study in the field of harvesting machines for shell fruits and lessons learnt in engineering design. Appl. Sci. 10(11), 3809 (2020)
Feniser, C., Burz, G., Mocan, M., Ivascu, L., Gherhes, V., Otel, C.C.: The evaluation and application of the TRIZ method for increasing eco-innovative levels in SMEs. Sustainability 9(7), 1125 (2017)
Borgianni, Y., Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F.S., Rotini, F.: The process for individuating TRIZ inventive principles: deterministic, stochastic or domain-oriented?. Des. Sci. 7, e12 (2021)
Acknowledgements
The research is conducted within the project “fine-tuning new and smart ECO-design guidelines” (“few sECOnds”), funded by the Free University of Bozen/Bolzano (RTD 2019 call). The authors would like to thank Davide Russo and Christian Spreafico for their initial insights on the present work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y. (2021). An Ideality-Based Map to Describe Sustainable Design Initiatives. In: Borgianni, Y., Brad, S., Cavallucci, D., Livotov, P. (eds) Creative Solutions for a Sustainable Development. TFC 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 635. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86614-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86614-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86613-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86614-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)