Skip to main content

The KL-Divergence Between a Graph Model and its Fair I-Projection as a Fairness Regularizer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track (ECML PKDD 2021)

Abstract

Learning and reasoning over graphs is increasingly done by means of probabilistic models, e.g. exponential random graph models, graph embedding models, and graph neural networks. When graphs are modeling relations between people, however, they will inevitably reflect biases, prejudices, and other forms of inequity and inequality. An important challenge is thus to design accurate graph modeling approaches while guaranteeing fairness according to the specific notion of fairness that the problem requires. Yet, past work on the topic remains scarce, is limited to debiasing specific graph modeling methods, and often aims to ensure fairness in an indirect manner.

We propose a generic approach applicable to most probabilistic graph modeling approaches. Specifically, we first define the class of fair graph models corresponding to a chosen set of fairness criteria. Given this, we propose a fairness regularizer defined as the KL-divergence between the graph model and its I-projection onto the set of fair models. We demonstrate that using this fairness regularizer in combination with existing graph modeling approaches efficiently trades-off fairness with accuracy, whereas the state-of-the-art models can only make this trade-off for the fairness criterion that they were specifically designed for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In our proposed framework, we require these constraints to be satisfied exactly in order for p to be fair. However, prior work has also allowed for a percentage-wise deviation [34].

  2. 2.

    The distribution that results from the reverse KL-divergence formulation is much less practical to compute and was therefore not further considered for this work.

  3. 3.

    A table with the results in text format is provided in the Appendix.

  4. 4.

    All experiments were conducted using half the hyperthreads on a machine equipped with a 12 Core Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold processor and 256 GB of RAM.

References

  1. Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pp. 36–43 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, A., Beygelzimer, A., Dudík, M., Langford, J., Wallach, H.: A reductions approach to fair classification. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 60–69. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alghamdi, W., Asoodeh, S., Wang, H., Calmon, F.P., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K.N.: Model projection: theory and applications to fair machine learning. In: 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), pp. 2711–2716. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bose, A., Hamilton, W.: Compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 715–724 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R.: Practical use of the information-theoretic approach. In: Model selection and inference, pp. 75–117. Springer, New York (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7_3

  6. Buyl, M., De Bie, T.: DeBayes: a Bayesian method for debiasing network embeddings. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1220–1229. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calmon, F.P., Wei, D., Vinzamuri, B., Ramamurthy, K.N., Varshney, K.R.: Optimized pre-processing for discrimination prevention. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3995–4004 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cotter, A., et al.: Optimization with non-differentiable constraints with applications to fairness, recall, churn, and other goals. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20(172), 1–59 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cover, T.M.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, Hoboken (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Csiszár, I.: I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. Annals Prob. 146–158 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Csiszár, I., Matus, F.: Information projections revisited. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 49(6), 1474–1490 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Bie, T.: Maximum entropy models and subjective interestingness: an application to tiles in binary databases. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 23(3), 407–446 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamilton, W.L., Ying, R., Leskovec, J.: Representation learning on graphs: methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05584 (2017)

  15. Hardt, M., Price, E., Srebro, N.: Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3323–3331 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hofstra, B., Corten, R., Van Tubergen, F., Ellison, N.B.: Sources of segregation in social networks: a novel approach using Facebook. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82(3), 625–656 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, H., Nachum, O.: Identifying and correcting label bias in machine learning. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 702–712. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kang, B., Lijffijt, J., De Bie, T.: Conditional network embeddings. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karimi, F., Génois, M., Wagner, C., Singer, P., Strohmaier, M.: Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks. Sci. Reports 8(1), 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kipf, T.N., Welling, M.: Variational graph auto-encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.07308 (2016)

  21. Laclau, C., Redko, I., Choudhary, M., Largeron, C.: All of the fairness for edge prediction with optimal transport. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1774–1782. PMLR (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, P., Wang, Y., Zhao, H., Hong, P., Liu, H.: On dyadic fairness: exploring and mitigating bias in graph connections. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liben-Nowell, D., Kleinberg, J.: The link-prediction problem for social networks. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(7), 1019–1031 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martínez, V., Berzal, F., Cubero, J.C.: A survey of link prediction in complex networks. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 49(4), 1–33 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Masrour, F., Wilson, T., Yan, H., Tan, P.N., Esfahanian, A.: Bursting the filter bubble: fairness-aware network link prediction. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 841–848 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McAuley, J., Leskovec, J.: Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 539–547 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09635 (2019)

  29. Rahman, T., Surma, B., Backes, M., Zhang, Y.: Fairwalk: towards fair graph embedding. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2019, pp. 3289–3295. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., Lusher, D.: An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29(2), 173–191 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K.N., Calmon, F.: Optimized score transformation for fair classification. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1673–1683. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Woodworth, B., Gunasekar, S., Ohannessian, M.I., Srebro, N.: Learning non-discriminatory predictors. In: Conference on Learning Theory, pp. 1920–1953. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., Philip, S.Y.: A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 32, 4–24 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Zafar, M.B., Valera, I., Rogriguez, M.G., Gummadi, K.P.: Fairness constraints: mechanisms for fair classification. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 962–970. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, M., Chen, Y.: Link prediction based on graph neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5171–5181 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the ERC under the EU’s 7th Framework and H2020 Programmes (ERC Grant Agreement no. 615517 and 963924), the Flemish Government (AI Research Program), the BOF of Ghent University (PhD scholarship BOF20/DOC/144), and the FWO (project no. G091017N, G0F9816N, 3G042220).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten Buyl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Buyl, M., De Bie, T. (2021). The KL-Divergence Between a Graph Model and its Fair I-Projection as a Fairness Regularizer. In: Oliver, N., Pérez-Cruz, F., Kramer, S., Read, J., Lozano, J.A. (eds) Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track. ECML PKDD 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12976. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86520-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86520-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86519-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86520-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics