Skip to main content

The Impact of Explicating Learning Goals on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Evaluating a Learning Goal Visualization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology-Enhanced Learning for a Free, Safe, and Sustainable World (EC-TEL 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12884))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Clear formulation and communication of learning goals is an acknowledged best practice in instruction at all levels. Typically, in curricula and course management systems, dedicated places for specifying learning goals at course-level exist. However, even in higher education, learning goals are typically formulated in a very heterogeneous manner. They are often not concrete enough to serve as guidance for students to master a lecture or to foster self-regulated learning. In this paper, we present a systematics for formulating learning goals for university courses, and a web-based widget that visualises these learning goals within a university’s learning management system. The systematics is based on the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives by Anderson and Krathwohl. We evaluated both the learning goal systematics and the web-based widget in three lectures at our university. The participating lecturers perceived the systematics as easy-to-use and as helpful to structure their course and the learning content. Students’ perceived benefits lay in getting a quick overview of the lecture and its content as well as clear information regarding the requirements for passing the exam. By analysing the widget’s activity log data, we could show that the widget helps students to track their learning progress and supports them in planning and conducting their learning in a self-regulated way. This work highlights how theory-based best practice in teaching can be transferred into a digital learning environment; at the same time it highlights that good non-technical systematics for formulating learning goals positively impacts on teaching and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://moodle.com/de/.

  2. 2.

    https://atutor.github.io/.

  3. 3.

    https://olat.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://docs.moodle.org/310/en/Outcomes.

  5. 5.

    https://moodle.org/plugins/block_learning_plan.

References

  1. Bloom, B.S., et al.: Taxonomy of educational objectives. vol. 1: cognitive domain. New York: McKay 20, 24 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brusilovsky, P., Hsiao, I.-H., Folajimi, Y.: QuizMap: open social student modeling and adaptive navigation support with TreeMaps. In: Kloos, C.D., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6964, pp. 71–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brusilovsky, P., Sosnovsky, S., Shcherbinina, O.: QuizGuide: increasing the educational value of individualized self-assessment quizzes with adaptive navigation support. In: E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. pp. 1806–1813. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casey, R.J., Gentile, P., Bigger, S.W.: Teaching appraisal in higher education: an Australian perspective. High. Educ. 34(4), 459–482 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cushion, C.J., Townsend, R.C.: Technology-enhanced learning in coaching: a review of literature. Educ. Rev. 71(5), 631–649 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLong, M., Winter, D., Yackel, C.A.: Mental maps and learning objectives: the fast-slo algorithm for creating student learning objectives. Probl. Resour. Issues Math. Undergr. Stud. 15(4), 307–338 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeLong, M., Winter, D., Yackel, C.A.: Student learning objectives and mathematics teaching. Probl. Resour. Issues Math. Undergr. Stud. 15(3), 226–258 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fessl, A., Blunk, O., Prilla, M., Pammer, V.: The known universe of reflection guidance: a literature review. Int. J. TEL 9(2–3), 103–125 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fessl, A., Bratic, M., Pammer, V.: Continuous learning with a quiz for stroke nurses. Int. J. TEL 6(3), 265–275 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fulkerth, R.: A case study from golden gate university: using course objectives to facilitate blended learning in shortened courses. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 13(1), 43–54 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gagne, R.M., Leslie, J.: Briggs, Wagner, W.W.: principles of instructional design (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gagne, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.C., Keller, J.M., Russell, J.D.: Principles of instructional design (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Somyurek, S., Brusilovsky, P.: An intelligent interface for learning content: combining an open learner model and social comparison to support self-regulated learning and engagement. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 152–163 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hadwin, A.F., Webster, E.A.: Calibration in goal setting: examining the nature of judgments of confidence. Learn. Instr. 24, 37–47 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Aston, R.: What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Stud. High. Educ. 42(8), 1567–1579 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ivanović, M., Xinogalos, S., Pitner, T., Savić, M.: Technology enhanced learning in programming courses-international perspective. Educ. Inf. Technol. 22(6), 2981–3003 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkwood, A., Price, L.: Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn. Media Technol. 39(1), 6–36 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krathwohl, D.R., Anderson, L.W.: Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of bloom’s taxonomy. Educ. Psychol. 45(1), 64–65 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mager, R.F.: Preparing instructional objectives (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marzano, R.J.: Designing & Teaching Learning Goals & Objectives. Solution Tree Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCardle, L., Webster, E.A., Haffey, A., Hadwin, A.F.: Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: goal properties and patterns. Stud. High. Educ. 42(11), 2153–2169 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C.: What do students want? Making sense of student preferences in technology-enhanced learning. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 8(1), 26–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stronge, J.H.: Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Towns, M.H.: Developing learning objectives and assessment plans at a variety of institutions: examples and case studies. J. Chem. Educ. 87(1), 91–96 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Winne, P., Hadwin, A.: Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Studying As Self-regulated Learning, pp. 277–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winne, P.H., Jamieson-Noel, D.: Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 27(4), 551–572 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, M., Winne, P.H.: Modeling academic achievement by self-reported versus traced goal orientation. Learn. Instr. 22(6), 413–419 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The ‘TEL Marketplace’ innovation program and ‘Learning Goal Widget’ pilot is funded within the project ‘Digitale TU Graz’ of the vice rectorate for ‘Digitisation and Change Management’ and ‘Teaching’ of Graz University of Technology. The iDev40 project has received funding from the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No. 783163. The Know-Center is funded within the Austrian COMET Program – Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies – under the auspices of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth and by the State of Styria. COMET is managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Fessl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fessl, A., Maitz, K., Dennerlein, S., Pammer-Schindler, V. (2021). The Impact of Explicating Learning Goals on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Evaluating a Learning Goal Visualization. In: De Laet, T., Klemke, R., Alario-Hoyos, C., Hilliger, I., Ortega-Arranz, A. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning for a Free, Safe, and Sustainable World. EC-TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86435-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86436-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics