Abstract
Clear formulation and communication of learning goals is an acknowledged best practice in instruction at all levels. Typically, in curricula and course management systems, dedicated places for specifying learning goals at course-level exist. However, even in higher education, learning goals are typically formulated in a very heterogeneous manner. They are often not concrete enough to serve as guidance for students to master a lecture or to foster self-regulated learning. In this paper, we present a systematics for formulating learning goals for university courses, and a web-based widget that visualises these learning goals within a university’s learning management system. The systematics is based on the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives by Anderson and Krathwohl. We evaluated both the learning goal systematics and the web-based widget in three lectures at our university. The participating lecturers perceived the systematics as easy-to-use and as helpful to structure their course and the learning content. Students’ perceived benefits lay in getting a quick overview of the lecture and its content as well as clear information regarding the requirements for passing the exam. By analysing the widget’s activity log data, we could show that the widget helps students to track their learning progress and supports them in planning and conducting their learning in a self-regulated way. This work highlights how theory-based best practice in teaching can be transferred into a digital learning environment; at the same time it highlights that good non-technical systematics for formulating learning goals positively impacts on teaching and learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bloom, B.S., et al.: Taxonomy of educational objectives. vol. 1: cognitive domain. New York: McKay 20, 24 (1956)
Brusilovsky, P., Hsiao, I.-H., Folajimi, Y.: QuizMap: open social student modeling and adaptive navigation support with TreeMaps. In: Kloos, C.D., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6964, pp. 71–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_7
Brusilovsky, P., Sosnovsky, S., Shcherbinina, O.: QuizGuide: increasing the educational value of individualized self-assessment quizzes with adaptive navigation support. In: E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. pp. 1806–1813. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2004)
Casey, R.J., Gentile, P., Bigger, S.W.: Teaching appraisal in higher education: an Australian perspective. High. Educ. 34(4), 459–482 (1997)
Cushion, C.J., Townsend, R.C.: Technology-enhanced learning in coaching: a review of literature. Educ. Rev. 71(5), 631–649 (2019)
DeLong, M., Winter, D., Yackel, C.A.: Mental maps and learning objectives: the fast-slo algorithm for creating student learning objectives. Probl. Resour. Issues Math. Undergr. Stud. 15(4), 307–338 (2005)
DeLong, M., Winter, D., Yackel, C.A.: Student learning objectives and mathematics teaching. Probl. Resour. Issues Math. Undergr. Stud. 15(3), 226–258 (2005)
Fessl, A., Blunk, O., Prilla, M., Pammer, V.: The known universe of reflection guidance: a literature review. Int. J. TEL 9(2–3), 103–125 (2017)
Fessl, A., Bratic, M., Pammer, V.: Continuous learning with a quiz for stroke nurses. Int. J. TEL 6(3), 265–275 (2014)
Fulkerth, R.: A case study from golden gate university: using course objectives to facilitate blended learning in shortened courses. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 13(1), 43–54 (2009)
Gagne, R.M., Leslie, J.: Briggs, Wagner, W.W.: principles of instructional design (1992)
Gagne, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.C., Keller, J.M., Russell, J.D.: Principles of instructional design (2005)
Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Somyurek, S., Brusilovsky, P.: An intelligent interface for learning content: combining an open learner model and social comparison to support self-regulated learning and engagement. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 152–163 (2016)
Hadwin, A.F., Webster, E.A.: Calibration in goal setting: examining the nature of judgments of confidence. Learn. Instr. 24, 37–47 (2013)
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Aston, R.: What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Stud. High. Educ. 42(8), 1567–1579 (2017)
Ivanović, M., Xinogalos, S., Pitner, T., Savić, M.: Technology enhanced learning in programming courses-international perspective. Educ. Inf. Technol. 22(6), 2981–3003 (2017)
Kirkwood, A., Price, L.: Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn. Media Technol. 39(1), 6–36 (2014)
Krathwohl, D.R., Anderson, L.W.: Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of bloom’s taxonomy. Educ. Psychol. 45(1), 64–65 (2010)
Mager, R.F.: Preparing instructional objectives (1962)
Marzano, R.J.: Designing & Teaching Learning Goals & Objectives. Solution Tree Press (2010)
McCardle, L., Webster, E.A., Haffey, A., Hadwin, A.F.: Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: goal properties and patterns. Stud. High. Educ. 42(11), 2153–2169 (2017)
Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C.: What do students want? Making sense of student preferences in technology-enhanced learning. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 8(1), 26–39 (2017)
Stronge, J.H.: Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD (2018)
Towns, M.H.: Developing learning objectives and assessment plans at a variety of institutions: examples and case studies. J. Chem. Educ. 87(1), 91–96 (2010)
Winne, P., Hadwin, A.: Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Studying As Self-regulated Learning, pp. 277–304 (1998)
Winne, P.H., Jamieson-Noel, D.: Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 27(4), 551–572 (2002)
Zhou, M., Winne, P.H.: Modeling academic achievement by self-reported versus traced goal orientation. Learn. Instr. 22(6), 413–419 (2012)
Acknowledgement
The ‘TEL Marketplace’ innovation program and ‘Learning Goal Widget’ pilot is funded within the project ‘Digitale TU Graz’ of the vice rectorate for ‘Digitisation and Change Management’ and ‘Teaching’ of Graz University of Technology. The iDev40 project has received funding from the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No. 783163. The Know-Center is funded within the Austrian COMET Program – Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies – under the auspices of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth and by the State of Styria. COMET is managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fessl, A., Maitz, K., Dennerlein, S., Pammer-Schindler, V. (2021). The Impact of Explicating Learning Goals on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Evaluating a Learning Goal Visualization. In: De Laet, T., Klemke, R., Alario-Hoyos, C., Hilliger, I., Ortega-Arranz, A. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning for a Free, Safe, and Sustainable World. EC-TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86435-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86436-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)