Abstract
Current evidence states that urban green spaces (UGS) increase the quality of urban settings, enhance local resilience and promote sustainable lifestyles, being recognized as an effective nature-based-solution. The socioecological research, by combining social and ecological variables, is useful to fully explore Humans-Nature interactions. The direct observation of behaviours is a mobilized technique in socioecological research. However, two particular aspects of this technique should be further explored: the relationship of individuals with the UGS and the mapping of the behaviours that configure this relationship. The present work describes the methodological steps of the Behavioural Mapping (BM) application in a public garden located in the city of Porto regarding users’ behaviours. Preliminary findings identified that the poor quality of both urban furniture and maintenance of natural elements in the garden strongly discouraged a full enjoyment of the UGS. Also, warm areas with trees are usually preferred by users. The absence of well-maintained natural elements does not allow full fruition of the UGS. Based on these findings, BM can be useful for both socioecological research and supporting people-centred and place-based public policies. BM can support landscape planners and decision-makers with empirical evidence on the relationship between space design and its uses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott A (2020) The Chicago school and city planning. Civ Sociol 1:14106. https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.14106
Alves S (2012) The patterns of unemployment and the geography of social housing. Int J Soc Hum Sci Eng 6:259–267
Alves S (2016) Spaces of inequality: It’s not differentiation, it is inequality! A socio-spatial analysis of the City of Porto. Port J Soc Sci 15:409–431. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.15.3.409_1
Barker R (1968) Ecological psychology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California
Bloor M, Wood F (2006) Theoretical saturation. Keywords in qualitative methods. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, pp 165–166
Catton WR, Dunlap RE (1980) A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. Am Behav Sci 24:45–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276428002400103
Cooper Marcus C, Francis C (1998) People places: design guidelines for urban open space, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Toronto
Cosco NG, Moore RC, Islam MZ (2010) Behavior mapping: a method for linking preschool physical activity and outdoor design. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:513–519. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181cea27a
Cox A, Loebach J, Little S (2018) Understanding the Nature Play Milieu: using behavior mapping to investigate children’s activities in outdoor play spaces. Child Youth Environ 28:232–261. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.28.2.0232
Dai P, Zhang S, Chen Z et al (2019) Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban parks based on social network data. Sustain 11:5386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195386
Elands B, Peters K, de Vries S (2018) Promoting social cohesion—increasing well-being. In: van den Bosch M, Bird W (eds) Oxford textbook of nature and public health: the role of nature in improving the health of a population. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 116–122
Fernandes CT (2017) Aspetos do Comportamento Humano no Jardim Botânico do Porto [Aspects of Human Behaviour in the Botanical Garden of Porto]. Faculty of Sciences of th University of Porto
Ferret MP (2020) Infancia, Naturaleza y Confinamiento [Childhood, Nature and Lock-Down]. Finisterra Rev Port Geogr 55:169–174. https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis20352
Fitzhugh B, Butler VL, Bovy KM, Etnier MA (2019) Human ecodynamics: a perspective for the study of long-term change in socioecological systems. J Archaeol Sci Reports 23:1077–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.03.016
Goličnik B, Ward Thompson C (2010) Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 94:38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.016
Gouveia LM da S (2016) Vivências de idosos num jardim público do Porto—processos de socialização e de aprendizagem em torno do jogo da sueca [Experiences of the elderly in a public garden in Porto—socialization and learning processes around the Swedish game]. University of Porto
Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett ST, Redman CL (2008) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. In: Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Endlicher W et al (eds) Urban ecology. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 123–141
Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J et al (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:E1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
Haines-Young R, Potschin MB (2018) Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) V5.1 and guidance on the application of the revised structure. Nottingham
Innes C, Anand M, Bauch CT (2013) The impact of human-environment interactions on the stability of forest-grassland mosaic ecosystems. Sci Rep 3:2689. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02689
Ittelson WH, Rivlin LG, Proshansky H (1970) The use of behavioural maps in environmental psychology. In: Prohansky HM, Ittelson WH, Rivlin LG (eds) Environmental psychology: man and his physical setting. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY, pp 658–668
Jacobson AP, Riggio J, Tait A, Baillie J (2019) Global areas of low human impact (‘Low Impact Areas’) and fragmentation of the natural world. Sci Rep 9:14179 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50558-6
Jennings V, Bamkole O (2019) The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: an avenue for health promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030452
Klein C, Kuhnen A, Felippe ML, Silveira BB (2018) Place-centered or person-centered? Considerations about the behavioral mapping approach. Trends Psychol 26:593–616
Kluger LC, Gorris P, Kochalski S et al (2020) Studying human–nature relationships through a network lens: a systematic review. People Nat 2:1100–1116. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10136
Maraja R, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T (2016) Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosyst Serv 17:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007
Martins LPS (1995) Do passeio público ao “Jogo de Cartas”—Apontamentos sobre os espaços ajardinados do Porto [From the public walk to the “Card Game”—Notes on the landscaped spaces of Porto]. In: Colóquio VI (ed) Universidade do Porto. Ibérico de Geografia - Atas. Universidade do Porto e Instituto de Geografia da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal, pp 627–640
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Our human Planet. Island Press, Washington, DC
Monteiro A, Sousa C, Fonseca L et al (2013) Atlas da saúde e da doença—vulnerabilidades climáticas e socioeconómicas na Grande Área Metropolitana do Porto e Concelho do Porto [Atlas of health and disease—climatic and socioeconomic vulnerabilities in the Greater Metropolitan Area of Porto and the municipality of Porto]. CHERG, Porto
Ng CF (2015) Behavioral mapping and tracking. In: Gifford R (ed) Research methods for environmental psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Nova Jersey, pp 29–51
Olmos-Martínez E, Ortega-Rubio A (2020) Socioecology. In: Ortega-Rubio A (ed) Socio-ecological studies in natural protected areas. Springer, Cham, pp 3–17
Park RE (1915) The city: suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment. Am J Soc 20:577–612
Petrosillo I, Aretano R, Zurlini G (2015) Socioecological Systems. In: Fath B (ed) Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences—encyclopedia of ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 419–425
Pinheiro JQ, Elali GA, Fernandes OS (2008) Observando a interação pessoa-ambiente: Vestígios ambientais e mapeamento comportamental [Observing the person-environment interaction: environmental traces and behavioral mapping]. In: Pinheiro JQ, Günther H (eds) Métodos de pesquisa nos estudos pessoa-ambiente. Casa do Psicólogo, São Paulo, SP, pp 75–104
Pordata (2020) Environmental pollution and climate. https://www.pordata.pt/en/Search/averagetemperature. Accessed 18 Feb 2021
Preiser R, Biggs R, De Vos A, Folke C (2018) Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecol Soc 23:46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10558-230446
Rodrigues FMA (2015) Da Especificidade do Parque Português Contemporâneo [Specificity of the Park Portuguese Contemporary]. Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto
Sanoff H, Coates G (1971) Behavioral mapping: an ecological analysis of activities in a residential setting. Environ Stud 2:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207237108709471
Skandrani Z (2016) Considering the socio-ecological co-construction of nature conceptions as a basis for urban environmental governance. J Geogr Nat Disasters 06:5–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0587.1000153
Smaniotto Costa C, Šuklje Erjavec I, Kenna T et al (2019) CyberParks—the interface between people, places and technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Sommer R, Sommer B (2002) Mapping and trace measures. In: Sommer R, Sommer B (eds) A practical guide to behavioural research: tools and techniques, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 63–79
Tilman D, Lehman C (2001) Human-caused environmental change: impacts on plant diversity and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5433–5440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091093198
Vidal DG, Fernandes CO, Viterbo LMF et al (2021) Combining an evaluation grid application to assess ecosystem services of urban green spaces and a socioeconomic spatial analysis. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 28(4):291–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1808108
Vidal DG, Fernandes CO, Viterbo LMF et al (2021) Usos e Perceções sobre Jardins e Parques Públicos Urbanos: Resultados Preliminares de um Inquérito na Cidade Do Porto (Portugal) [Uses and perceptions about public urban gardens and parks: preliminary results of a survey in the City of Porto (Portugal)]. Finisterra—Rev Port Geogr 56(116):137–157. https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis19813
Ward Thompson C (2013) Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. J Environ Psychol 34:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.003
Weiss RS, Boutourline S (1962) Fairs, pavilions, exhibits, and their audiences. Publisher not identified, Place of publication not identified
York R, Mancus P (2009) Critical human ecology: historical materialism and natural laws. Sociol Theory 27:122–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01340.x
Zacharias J, Stathopoulos T, Wu H (2001) Microclimate and downtown open space activity. Environ Behav 33:296–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916501332008
Zacharias J, Stathopoulos T, Wu H (2004) Spatial behavior in San Francisco’s Plazas: the effects of microclimate, other people, and environmental design. Environ Behav 36:638–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503262545
Acknowledgements
Ricardo Cunha Dias would like to thank to Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, I.P.) through the Doctoral Grant SFRH/BD/143238/2019. Diogo Guedes Vidal, Nelson Barros and Rui Leandro Maia would like to thank to UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), funded by FCT, I.P, in the scope of FCT Project UID/Multi/04546/2019.
Funding
Diogo Guedes Vidal was funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, I.P.) through the Doctoral Grant SFRH/BD/143238/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vidal, D.G. et al. (2022). Behavioural Mapping of Urban Green Spaces Users: Methodological Procedures Applied to Corujeira Garden (Porto, Portugal). In: Leal Filho, W., Vidal, D.G., Dinis, M.A.P., Dias, R.C. (eds) Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86304-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86304-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86303-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86304-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)