Abstract
Cities are particularly exposed to risks arising from climate change, and therefore have to adapt continuously to changing conditions that affect citizens’ health and wellbeing. As the community level is where climate change impacts are most experienced, successful adaptation necessarily implies the broad support of affected communities, including the active involvement of citizens in assessing and responding to climate risks. Yet, many studies have confirmed that urban climate adaptation is in its early stages. Several obstacles have been found to hinder the successful governance of climate adaptation in cities, including the limited availability of site-specific information with high spatial and temporal resolution to support decision-making processes, lack of citizen engagement, and difficulties in communication between individuals and institutions. This chapter explores how an approach based on citizen sensing (CS), defined as citizens acting as sensors to collect and send information using e.g. mobile devices or participatory online platforms, can help to overcome these issues and contribute to the governance of urban climate adaptation. Drawing from the experience of the European research project Citizen Sensing, which has further developed the CS approach by proposing a digital two-way communication system between citizens and relevant institutions, we discuss how and to what extent CS can increase engagement by citizens, while enhancing the preparedness of authorities for taking effective risk management actions and strengthening communication to increase urban climate resilience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Afzalan N, Sanchez TW, Evans-Cowley J (2017) Creating smarter cities: considerations for selecting online participatory tools. Cities 67:21–30
André K, Järnberg L, Gerger Swartling Å, Berg P, Segersson D, Amorim JH, Strömbäck L (2021) Assessing the quality of knowledge for adaptation–experiences from co-designing climate services in Sweden. Front. Climate 3(11)
Araos M, Berrang L, Ford JD, Austin SE, Biesbroek R, Lesnikowski A (2016) Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: a systematic global assessment. Environ Sci Policy 66:375–382
Ballantyne AG, Glaas E, Neset T-S, Wibeck V (2018) Localizing climate change: Nordic homeowners’ interpretations of visual representations for climate adaptation. Environ Commun 12(5):638–652
Bellinson R, Chu E (2019) Learning pathways and the governance of innovations in urban climate change resilience and adaptation. J Environ Plann Policy Manage 21(1):76–89
Billger M, Thuvander L, Wästberg BS (2016) In search of visualization challenges: the development and implementation of visualization tools for supporting dialogue in urban planning processes. Environ Plann Bq2: Urban Anal City Sci 44(6):1012–1035
Bremer S, Haque MM, Aziz SB, Kvamme S (2019) ‘My new routine’: Assessing the impact of citizen science on climate adaptation in Bangladesh. Environ Sci Policy 94:245–257
Brink E, Wamsler C (2018) Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation: mapping citizen–municipality interactions. Environ Policy Gov 28(2):82–97
Collins K, Ison R (2009) Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ Policy Gov 19(6):358–373
Connors JP, Galletti CS, Chow WTL (2013) Landscape configuration and urban heat island effects: assessing the relationship between landscape characteristics and land surface temperature in Phoenix. Arizona Landscape Ecology 28(2):271–283
Cortekar J, Bender S, Brune M, Groth M (2016) Why climate change adaptation in cities needs customised and flexible climate services. Climate Serv 4:42–51
Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J (2006) Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 21(2):333–352
Domingues RB, Santos MC, de Jesus SN, Ferreira Ó (2018) How a coastal community looks at coastal hazards and risks in a vulnerable barrier island system (Faro Beach, southern Portugal). Ocean Coast Manag 157:248–256
Ertiö T-P (2015) Participatory apps for urban planning—space for improvement. Plan Pract Res 30(3):303–321
European Commission (2013) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: An EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2021) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Forging a climate-resilient Europe—the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change. European Commission, Brussels
Gago EJ, Roldan J, Pacheco-Torres R, Ordóñez J (2013) The city and urban heat islands: a review of strategies to mitigate adverse effects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:749–758
Glaas E, Hjerpe M, Karlson M, Neset T-S (2020) Visualization for citizen participation: user perceptions on a mainstreamed online participatory tool and its usefulness for climate change planning. Sustainability 12(2):705
Graça M, Cruz S, Monteiro A, Neset T-S (2021) Designing green spaces for climate adaptation: is evidence-based research aligned with practitioners’ needs? Manuscript submitted for publication
Hegger DLT, Mees HLP, Driessen PPJ, Runhaar HAC (2017) The roles of residents in climate adaptation: a systematic review in the case of the Netherlands. Environ Policy Gov 27(4):336–350
Hjerpe M, Glaas E, Storbjörk S (2018) Scrutinizing virtual citizen involvement in planning: ten applications of an online participatory tool. Politics and Governance 6(3):159–169
Hügel S, Davies AR (2020) Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature. WIREs Climate Change 11(4), e645
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Climate Change 2014—impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: part a: global and sectoral aspects: working group II contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report: volume 1: global and sectoral aspects (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jones L, Champalle C, Chesterman S, Cramer L, Crane TA (2017) Constraining and enabling factors to using long-term climate information in decision-making. Climate Policy 17(5):551–572
Kern K (2019) Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Environ Politics 28(1):125–145
Kiparsky M, Milman A, Vicuña S (2012) Climate and water: knowledge of impacts to action on adaptation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37(1):163–194
Klein J, Araos M, Karimo A, Heikkinen M, Ylä-Anttila T, Juhola S (2018) The role of the private sector and citizens in urban climate change adaptation: evidence from a global assessment of large cities. Glob Environ Chang 53:127–136
Madureira H, Monteiro A, Cruz S (2021) Where to go or where not to go—a method for advising communities during extreme temperatures. Climate 9(3)
Martins Van Jaarsveld G (2020) The effects of COVID-19 among the elderly population: a case for closing the digital divide. Frontiers Psychiatry 11(1211)
Meier F, Fenner D, Grassmann T, Otto M, Scherer D (2017) Crowdsourcing air temperature from citizen weather stations for urban climate research. Urban Climate 19:170–191
Mohajerani A, Bakaric J, Jeffrey-Bailey T (2017) The urban heat island effect, its causes, and mitigation, with reference to the thermal properties of asphalt concrete. J Environ Manage 197:522–538
Morss RE, Wilhelmi OV, Meehl GA, Dilling L (2011) Improving societal outcomes of extreme weather in a changing climate: an integrated perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36(1):1–25
Moser SC, Pike C (2015) Community engagement on adaptation: meeting a growing capacity need. Urban Climate 14:111–115
Munaretto S, Siciliano G, Turvani ME (2014) Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: a framework for climate adaptation governance. Ecol Soc 19(2)
Navarra C, Opach T, Vrotsou K, Joling A, Wilk J, Neset T S (2021) A progressive development of a visual analysis interface of climate-related VGI. Environmental Earth Sciences
Neset T-S, Wilk J, Cruz S, Graça M, Rød JK, Maarse M, Wallin P, Andersson L (2021) Co-designing a citizen science climate service. Manuscript under review
Räsänen A, Juhola S, Nygren A, Käkönen M, Kallio M, Monge A, Kanninen M (2016) Climate change, multiple stressors and human vulnerability: a systematic review. Reg Environ Change 16(8):2291–2302
Rød JK, Maarse MJ (2021) Using citizen sensing to identify heat-exposed neighbourhoods. Urban Sci 5(1)
Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Romero-Lankao P, Mehrotra S, Dhakal S, Ibrahim SA (2018) Climate change and cities: second assessment report of the urban climate change research network. Cambridge University Press
Sheppard SRJ, Shaw A, Flanders D, Burch S, Wiek A, Carmichael J et al (2011) Future visioning of local climate change: a framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures 43(4):400–412
Sheth A (2009) Citizen sensing, social signals, and enriching human experience. IEEE Internet Comput 13(4):87–92
Sun R, Chen L (2017) Effects of green space dynamics on urban heat islands: mitigation and diversification. Ecosyst Serv 23:38–46
Thomas K, Hardy RD, Lazrus H, Mendez M, Orlove B, Rivera-Collazo I, Winthrop R (2019) Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: a social science review. WIREs Climate Change 10(2), e565
Tompkins EL, Eakin H (2012) Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 22(1):3–11
Unger J (2004) Intra-urban relationship between surface geometry and urban heat island: review and new approach. Climate Res 27(3):253–264
United Nations (2018) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision, online edition. https://population.un.org/wup/
van der Heijden J, Patterson J, Juhola S, Wolfram M (2019) Special section: advancing the role of cities in climate governance—promise, limits, politics. J Environ Planning Manage 62(3):365–373
Vaughan C, Dessai S, Hewitt C (2018) Surveying climate services: what can we learn from a bird’s-eye view? Weather Climate Soc 10(2):373–395
Vincent K, Daly M, Scannell C, Leathes B (2018) What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production? Climate Services 12:48–58
Wamsler C (2016) From risk governance to city-citizen collaboration: capitalizing on individual adaptation to climate change. Environ Policy Gov 26(3):184–204
Wamsler C, Alkan J, Björn H, Falck H, Hanson H, Oskarsson T et al (2020) Beyond participation: when citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Clim Change 158(2):235–254
Wamsler C, Brink E (2014) Interfacing citizens’ and institutions’ practice and responsibilities for climate change adaptation. Urban Climate 7:64–91
Wibeck V (2014) Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change—some lessons from recent literature. Environ Educ Res 20(3):387–411
Wilby RL, Perry GLW (2006) Climate change, biodiversity and the urban environment: a critical review based on London, UK. Progress Phys Geogr Earth Environ 30(1):73–98
Wolfram M, van der Heijden J, Juhola S, Patterson J (2019) Learning in urban climate governance: concepts, key issues and challenges. J Environ Planning Policy Manage 21(1):1–15
Yang H, Lee T, Juhola S (2021) The old and the climate adaptation: Climate justice, risks, and urban adaptation plan. Sustain Cities Soc 67, 102755
Yuan X-C, Wei Y-M, Wang B, Mi Z (2017) Risk management of extreme events under climate change. J Clean Prod 166:1169–1174
Zhao L, Oleson K, Bou-Zeid E, Krayenhoff ES, Bray A, Zhu Q et al (2021) Global multi-model projections of local urban climates. Nat Clim Chang 11(2):152–157
Acknowledgements
This research is part of the project ‘Citizen Sensing–Urban Climate Resilience through Participatory Risk Management Systems’. Citizen Sensing is part of ERA4CS, an ERA-NET initiated by JPI Climate, and funded by FORMAS (Sweden, Grant no. 2017-01719), FCT (Portugal, Grant no. ERA4CS/0001/2016), RCN (Norway), NWO (The Netherlands) with co-funding by the European Union (Grant 690462).
This work was financially supported by ERA4CS/0001/2016—Citizen Sensing—Urban 419 Climate Resilience through a Participatory Risk Management System (CitiSense), funded by FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P.
Marisa Graça was financially supported as a post-doc researcher at CITTA/FEUP by ERA4CS/0001/2016—Citizen Sensing—Urban 419 Climate Resilience through a Participatory Risk Management System (CitiSense), funded by FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graça, M., Neset, TS., Juhola, S., Cruz, S. (2022). Supporting Urban Climate Adaptation Governance Through Citizen Sensing. In: Leal Filho, W., Vidal, D.G., Dinis, M.A.P., Dias, R.C. (eds) Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86304-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86304-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86303-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86304-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)