Abstract
This work aims to develop a Machine Learning framework to predict voting behaviour. Data resulted from longitudinally collected variables during the Portuguese 2019 general election campaign. Naïve Bayes (NB), and Tree Augmented Naïve Bayes (TAN) and three different expert models using Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN) predict voting behaviour systematically for each moment in time considered using past information. Even though the differences found in some performance comparisons are not statistically significant, TAN and NB outperformed DBN experts’ models. The learned models outperformed one of the experts’ models when predicting abstention and two when predicting right-wing parties vote. Specifically, for the right-wing parties vote, TAN and NB presented satisfactory accuracy, while the experts’ models were below 50% in the third evaluation moment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dalton, R.J., Wattenberg, M.P.: Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)
Rahat, G., Sheafer, T.: The personalizations of politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Polit. Commun. 24(1), 65–80 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739
Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., Stanyer, J.: The personalization of mediated political communication: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism 13(2), 203–220 (2012)
Langer, A.I.: A historical exploration of the personalisation of politics in the print media: the British prime ministers (1945–1999). Parliam. Aff. 60(3), 371–387 (2007)
Adam, S., Maier, M.: Personalization of politics a critical review and agenda for research. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 34(1), 213–257 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101
Spisak, B.R., Van Der Laken, P.A., Doornenbal, B.M.: Finding the right fuel for the analytical engine: expanding the leader trait paradigm through machine learning? Leadersh. Q. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.005
Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Elsevier, San Francisco (2014)
Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian network classifiers. Mach. Learn. 29(2), 131–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007465528199
Gama, J., Ferreira, A.C.P.D.L., Carvalho, D., Faceli, K., Lorena, A.C., Oliveira, M.: Extração de conhecimento de dados: data mining. Edições Sílabo (2015)
Needham, C.J., Bradford, J.R., Bulpitt, A.J., Westhead, D.R.: A primer on learning in Bayesian networks for computational biology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3(8), 1409–1416 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030129
Duan, Z., Wang, L.: K-dependence Bayesian classifier ensemble. Entropy 19(12), 651 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120651
Heintzman, N., Kleinberg, S.: Using uncertain data from body-worn sensors to gain insight into type 1 diabetes. J. Biomed. Inform. 63, 259–268 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.08.022
Yu, K., Li, J., Liu, L.: A review on algorithms for constraint-based causal discovery, pp. 1–17 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.03977
Murphy, K., Mian, S.: Modeling gene expression data using dynamic Bayesian networks. BT-Technical Report, Computer Science Division. University of California, Berkeley (1999)
Zhu, S., Wang, Y.: Hidden markov induced dynamic Bayesian network for recovering time evolving gene regulatory networks. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17841
Jia, Y., Huan, J.: Constructing non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks with a flexible lag choosing mechanism. BMC Bioinformatics 11(Suppl. 6), 1–13 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-27
Uusitalo, L.: Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecol. Model. 203(3–4), 312–318 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033
Marcot, B.G., Holthausen, R.S., Raphael, M.G., Rowland, M.M., Wisdom, M.J.: Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement. For. Ecol. Manage. 153(1–3), 29–42 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00452-2
Martín De Santa Olalla, F.J., Domínguez, A., Artigao, A., Fabeiro, C., Ortega, J.F.: Integrated water resources management of the hydrogeological unit ‘Eastern Mancha’ using Bayesian belief networks. Agric. Water Manag. 77(1–3), 21–36 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.029.
Dagum, P., Galper, A., Horvitz, E.: Dynamic network models for forecasting. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligent, pp. 41–48 (1992)
Demšar, J.: Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 1–30 (2006)
Iman, R.L., Davenport, J.M.: Approximations of the critical region of the fbietkan statistic. Commun. Stat. Methods 9(6), 571–595 (1980)
García, S., Herrera, F.: An extension on ‘statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets’ for all pairwise comparisons. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2677–2694 (2008)
Shaffer, J.P.: Modified sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(395), 826–831 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478341
da Silva, F.F., Costa, P.: Do we need warm leaders? Exploratory study of the role of voter evaluations of leaders’ traits on turnout in seven European countries. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 58(1), 117–140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12273
Silver, B.D., Anderson, B.A., Abramson, P.R.: Who overreports voting? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80(2), 613–624 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/1958277
Kuhn, M., Johnson, K.: Applied Predictive Modeling, vol. 26, Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3
Henderson, J.A.: Hookworm eradication as a natural experiment for schooling and voting in the American South. Polit. Behav. 40(2), 467–494 (2018)
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by national funds through FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project PACTO – “The impact of Political leaders’ Attributes and Campaign TOne on voting behaviour: a multimodal perspective” (PTDC/CPO-CPO/28886/2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Costa, P., Nogueira, A.R., Gama, J. (2021). Modelling Voting Behaviour During a General Election Campaign Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks. In: Marreiros, G., Melo, F.S., Lau, N., Lopes Cardoso, H., Reis, L.P. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12981. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86230-5_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86230-5_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86229-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86230-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)