Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation Strategies for Strategic Entrepreneurship in Ever-Increasing Turbulent Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Entrepreneurship

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Strategic entrepreneurship is an activity that enables the firms to take advantage of important opportunities or to cope with consequential environmental threats. Innovation is one of the critical elements of strategic entrepreneurship that supports strategies of firms to achieve and/or sustain competitive advantage in turbulent markets. This contribution presents different innovation strategies for strategic entrepreneurship to increase and/or sustain competitiveness and performance of firms in markets, and also to clarify how strategic entrepreneurship could be accompanied by crisis management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2629308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L., & Rovin, S. (2003). Redesigning society. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R. (2002). When are technologies disruptive: A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., & Zemsky, P. (2005). Disruptive technologies and the emergence of competition. The Rand Journal of Economics, 36(2), 229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardito, L., Coccia, M., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2021). Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID-19 outbreaks. R&D Management, 51(4), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12455

  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. (2005). How we compete: What companies around the world are doing to make it today’s global economy. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, J., Pfarrer, M. D., Short, C. E., & Coombs, W. T. (2017). Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1661–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316680030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, G., Coccia, M., & Rolfo, S. (2005). Strategy and market management of new product development: Evidence from Italian SMEs. International Journal of Product Development, 2(1–2), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2005.006675

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2005a). A taxonomy of public research bodies: A systemic approach. Prometheus, 23(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902042000331322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2005b). Measuring Intensity of technological change: The seismic approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2014a). Converging scientific fields and new technological paradigms as main drivers of the division of scientific labour in drug discovery process: The effects on strategic management of the R&D corporate change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(7), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.882501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2014b). Steel market and global trends of leading geo-economic players. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2014.058714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2015). Spatial relation between geo-climate zones and technological outputs to explain the evolution of technology. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 4(1–2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIS.2015.074642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2016a). Radical innovations as drivers of breakthroughs: Characteristics and properties of the management of technology leading to superior organizational performance in the discovery process of R&D labs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1095287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2016b). The relation between price setting in markets and asymmetries of systems of measurement of goods. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 14(Part B), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2016.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2017a). Varieties of capitalism’s theory of innovation and a conceptual integration with leadership-oriented executives: The relation between typologies of executive, technological and socioeconomic performances. International Journal Public Sector Performance Management, 3(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.084672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2017b). The Fishbone diagram to identify, systematize and analyze the sources of general purpose technologies. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v4i4.1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2017c). Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(9), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1268682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2017d). Sources of disruptive technologies for industrial change. L’industria –Rivista di economia e politica industriale, 38(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1430/87140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2017e). Disruptive firms and industrial change. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 4(4), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1453/jest.v4i4.1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2018a). Disruptive firms and technological change. Quaderni IRCrES-CNR, 3(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.23760/2499-6661.2018.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2018b). Theorem of not independence of any technological innovation. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 5(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v5i1.1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2018c). The origins of the economics of Innovation. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 5(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1453/jest.v5i1.1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019a). A theory of classification and evolution of technologies within a generalized Darwinism. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(5), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1523385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019b). The theory of technological parasitism for the measurement of the evolution of technology and technological forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019c). Comparative theories of the evolution of technology. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3841-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019d). Comparative institutional changes. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1277-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019e). Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technology in Society, 59, 101124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019f). Metabolism of public research organizations: How do laboratories consume state subsidies? Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 19(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0421-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019g). Intrinsic and extrinsic incentives to support motivation and performance of public organizations. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 6(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v6i1.1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020a). Multiple working hypotheses for technology analysis. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 7(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v7i2.2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020b). Comparative concepts of technology for strategic management. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3970-1. ISBN: 978-3-319-20927-2, online ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020c). Destructive technologies for industrial and corporate change. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3972-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020d). Comparative hypotheses for technology analysis. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3973-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020e). Comparative critical decisions in management. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3969-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020f). Deep learning technology for improving cancer care in society: New directions in cancer imaging driven by artificial intelligence. Technology in Society, 60(February), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020g). The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: Dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics. Scientometrics, 124, 451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020h). How does science advance? Theories of the evolution of science. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 7(3), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1453/jest.v7i3.2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020i). Asymmetry of the technological cycle of disruptive innovations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32, 1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1785415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020j). Factors determining the diffusion of COVID-19 and suggested strategy to prevent future accelerated viral infectivity similar to COVID. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2020k). An index to quantify environmental risk of exposure to future epidemics of the COVID-19 and similar viral agents. Theory and Practice. Environmental Research, 191, 110155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M. (2021). The relation between length of lockdown, numbers of infected people and deaths of Covid-19, and economic growth of countries: Lessons learned to cope with future pandemics similar to Covid-19. Science of The Total Environment, 775, article n. 145801, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145801

  • Coccia M. (2021a). Technological Innovation. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Edited by George Ritzer and Chris Rojek. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeost011.pub2

  • Coccia M. (2021b). Pandemic Prevention: Lessons from COVID-19. Encyclopedia 2021, 1, 433–444. MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, Encyclopedia of COVID-19, open access journal, https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1020036

  • Coccia M. (2022). Preparedness of countries to face covid-19 pandemic crisis: Strategic positioning and underlying structural factors to support strategies of prevention of pandemic threats, Environmental Research, vol. 203, n. 111678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111678

  • Coccia M., Bellitto M. (2018). Human progress and its socioeconomic effects in society. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 5(2), 160–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v5i2.1649

  • Coccia, M., & Finardi, U. (2012). Emerging nanotechnological research for future pathway of biomedicine. International Journal of Biomedical Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2(3–4), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBNN.2012.051223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M., & Finardi, U. (2013). New technological trajectories of non-thermal plasma technology in medicine. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 11(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBET.2013.055665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M., & Cadario E. (2014). Organisational (un)learning of public research labs in turbulent context. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 15(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2014.059756

  • Coccia, M., & Wang, L. (2015). Path-breaking directions of nanotechnology-based chemotherapy and molecular cancer therapy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94(May), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M., & Wang, L. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(8), 2057–2061. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510820113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M., & Watts, J. (2020). A theory of the evolution of technology: Technological parasitism and the implications for innovation management. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55, 101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2011). Global shift (6th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S., Stern, S., & Wu, J. (2019). Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 40(5), 736–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Simpson, B., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). The emergence of novelty in organizations. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D. A., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005). Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management Journal, 26(8), 691–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2002). Bounded rationality. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Ecological rationality: The normative study of heuristics. In G. Gerd, M. Todd Peter, & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world (pp. 487–497). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. (2003). The disruption opportunity. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2006). The innovator’s dilemma as a problem of organizational competence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2002). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Sirmon, D. G., & Trahms, C. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating value for individuals, organizations and society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (1988). Exploring corporate strategy. Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2002). Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge-based perspective. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 173–199). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilkki, K., Mäntylä, M., Karhu, K., Hämmäinen, H., & Ailisto, H. (2018). A disruption framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. A. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Ablex Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship: Exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship: A critical challenge for educators and researchers. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. M. (1995). The reorganization of the British Council: Management improvisation and policy uncertainty. Public Administration (London), 75(3), 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linstone, H. A. (1999). Decision making for technology executives. Using multiple perspectives to improve performance. Artech House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, B., Kearins, K., & Verreynne, M.-L. (2011). Developing a conceptual framework of strategic entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(3), 314–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzei, M. J. (2018). Strategic entrepreneurship: Content, process, context, and outcomes. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0512-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. I., & Taylor, M. J. (1982). Industrial organisation and localization. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, D., & Fiedrich, F. (2006). Training for improvisation in emergency management: Opportunities and limits for information technology. International Journal of Emergency Management, 3(4), 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. D., & Heppard, K. (Eds.). (2000). Entrepreneurship as strategy: Competing on the entrepreneurial edge (Entrepreneurship and the management of growing enterprises). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation (2nd ed.). Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, T. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2020). Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Management Journal, 41(12), 2275–2314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, R., & Gurtner, S. (2018). The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 268–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbusch, N., Rauch, A., & Bausch, A. (2013). The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task environment–performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(3), 633–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuelke-Leech, B.-A. (2018). A model for understanding the orders of magnitude of disruptive technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, M. W., Sellno, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization and crisis. Communication Yearbook, 21, 231–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkansky, I., & Zalmanovitch, Y. (2000). Improvisation in public administration and policy making in Israel. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P., Mitroff, I. I., Miller, D., & Miclani, A. (1988). Understanding industrial crises. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00038.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si, S., Zahra, S. A., Wu, X., & Jeng, D. J.-F. (2020). Disruptive innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economics. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 58, 101601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics., 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., & Fox, B. C. (2017). (Meta-)framing strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Organization, 15(4), 504–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. H., & Gumpert, D. E. (1985). The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, T. J. (2002). Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 451–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A., & Garud, R. (1994). The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation. In J. A. Baum & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 425–443). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchiato, R. (2017). Disruptive innovation, managerial cognition, and technology competition outcomes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116(2017), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venette, S. J. (2003). Risk communication in a high reliability organization: APHIS PPQ’s inclusion of risk in decision making. UMI Proquest Information and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster (pp. 628–652). Administrative Science Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNR – National Research Council of Italy, Torino, Italy

    Mario Coccia

Authors
  1. Mario Coccia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Coccia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cambridge, MA, USA

    Nezameddin Faghih

  2. Shiraz, Iran

    Amir Forouharfar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Coccia, M. (2022). Innovation Strategies for Strategic Entrepreneurship in Ever-Increasing Turbulent Markets. In: Faghih, N., Forouharfar, A. (eds) Strategic Entrepreneurship. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86032-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation