Skip to main content

Can Antitrust Trust Blockchain?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Algorithmic Antitrust

Part of the book series: Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship ((EALELS,volume 12))

Abstract

Although blockchain is decentralized by designed, today this technology is in practice in the hands of few corporations—antitrust can be crucial in restoring blockchain’s decentralization. Having provided a toolkit to navigate into the blockchain ecosystem of Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT), Section 3 investigates the relation between competition and blockchain. Is blockchain the real game-changer for today’s centralized digital markets? Section 3 explores the exploitation of DLT as a tool to enforce antitrust principles more efficiently in today’s tech-digital economy. In particular, it will be analyzed if blockchain and DLT, in general, can be considered as revolutionary progress also in the context of antitrust. Section 4 bears the question as to whether blockchain raises antitrust concerns and how to deal with them. Technologies are not the driver of anticompetitive conduct, but forms of government surveillance, such as antitrust, are fundamental for keeping people’s trust in new advanced technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Massarotto (2019a).

  2. 2.

    Massarotto (2019b, 2020a).

  3. 3.

    Id.

  4. 4.

    Massarotto (2019b); Werbach (2018).

  5. 5.

    Massarotto (2020b).

  6. 6.

    Tasca and Tessone (2019).

  7. 7.

    Wright and De Filippi (2018).

  8. 8.

    May (1994).

  9. 9.

    May (1988).

  10. 10.

    Id.

  11. 11.

    May (1994).

  12. 12.

    Ou (2017).

  13. 13.

    Bashir (2017).

  14. 14.

    Nakamoto (2008).

  15. 15.

    Massarotto (2019b).

  16. 16.

    Nakamoto (2008), p. 3.

  17. 17.

    Massarotto (2020a); UCL CBT (2019).

  18. 18.

    UCL CBT Supply Chain Report (2019); Hyperledger (2019).

  19. 19.

    Tapscott and Tapscott (2016).

  20. 20.

    Tasca and Tessone (2019).

  21. 21.

    European Commission (2019).

  22. 22.

    Eichholz (2017).

  23. 23.

    R3 (2020); Bashir (2017).

  24. 24.

    Schneier (2019b).

  25. 25.

    Xu et al. (2019), p. 7.

  26. 26.

    Clack et al. (2016).

  27. 27.

    Xu et al. (2019), p. 7.

  28. 28.

    2019 Dapp Market Report (2020).

  29. 29.

    Kolber (2018).

  30. 30.

    Tapscott and Tapscott (2016).

  31. 31.

    Shilov (2019).

  32. 32.

    Hassani et al. (2019).

  33. 33.

    PwC and Crypto Valley (2019).

  34. 34.

    Poon and Dryja (2016).

  35. 35.

    Id, p. 4.

  36. 36.

    What is Bitcoin’s (2018).

  37. 37.

    Bashir (2017).

  38. 38.

    Werbach (2018).

  39. 39.

    Massarotto (2020a).

  40. 40.

    Massarotto (2019b).

  41. 41.

    Statista (2020a).

  42. 42.

    Statista (2020b).

  43. 43.

    Massarotto (2018).

  44. 44.

    Massarotto (2018); Bhageshpur (2019).

  45. 45.

    Massarotto (2020b).

  46. 46.

    Submarine Cable Network (2020).

  47. 47.

    Massarotto (2020c).

  48. 48.

    Massarotto (2020a).

  49. 49.

    Catalini and Tucker (2018); Lianos (2018).

  50. 50.

    Dujmovic (2018).

  51. 51.

    Massarotto (2019b).

  52. 52.

    Massarotto (2020a).

  53. 53.

    Id.

  54. 54.

    Massarotto (2020c).

  55. 55.

    Massarotto (2019b).

  56. 56.

    Licklider and Taylor (1968).

  57. 57.

    Id.

  58. 58.

    Yu (2007).

  59. 59.

    Massarotto (2020a).

  60. 60.

    Canellis (2019).

  61. 61.

    Kolber (2018); Werbach and Cornell (2019).

  62. 62.

    Sung (2018).

  63. 63.

    Sidak (2013).

  64. 64.

    Blair and Sokol (2017).

  65. 65.

    Thumm and Gabison (2016).

  66. 66.

    Massarotto (2016).

  67. 67.

    Bessen and Meurer (2014); Bharadwaj et al. (2018).

  68. 68.

    Lianos (2018).

  69. 69.

    Halpin (2017).

  70. 70.

    Massarotto (2019a); OECD (2018).

  71. 71.

    FTC (2010).

  72. 72.

    Id.

  73. 73.

    Massarotto (2019a).

  74. 74.

    Dingman et al. (2019).

  75. 75.

    Massarotto (2020c).

  76. 76.

    Massarotto (2020c).

  77. 77.

    Nakamoto (2008).

  78. 78.

    Schneier (2019b).

  79. 79.

    Massarotto (2020a).

  80. 80.

    Puthal et al. (2018).

  81. 81.

    Werbach (2018).

  82. 82.

    Schneier (2019b).

  83. 83.

    Catalini and Tucker (2018), p. 8.

  84. 84.

    Kolber (2018).

  85. 85.

    Leising (2017).

  86. 86.

    Planet Compliance (n.d.).

  87. 87.

    Hern (2013); BBC (2013).

  88. 88.

    Schneier (2019a).

  89. 89.

    Schneier (2019a).

  90. 90.

    Zak (2017); Massarotto (2020a).

  91. 91.

    Massarotto (2020a).

  92. 92.

    Catalini and Tucker (2018); Lianos (2018).

  93. 93.

    Fehér (2019).

  94. 94.

    Ou (2017).

  95. 95.

    Lianos (2018).

  96. 96.

    Schneier (2019b).

  97. 97.

    Jacobs (2018).

  98. 98.

    Massarotto (2019b).

  99. 99.

    Cong and He (2019), p. 1755.

  100. 100.

    OECD (2018).

  101. 101.

    Cohen et al. (2016).

  102. 102.

    Ren and Ward (2019).

  103. 103.

    Bashir (2017); Cong et al. (2018).

  104. 104.

    Bashir (2017).

  105. 105.

    Ren and Ward (2019).

  106. 106.

    Stylianou (2019).

  107. 107.

    Catalini and Tucker (2018).

  108. 108.

    Szabo (2017).

  109. 109.

    Tuwiner (2020).

  110. 110.

    Baker (2020).

  111. 111.

    Günther (2018).

  112. 112.

    Dale (2019).

  113. 113.

    Nakamoto (2008).

  114. 114.

    Orcutt (2018).

  115. 115.

    Lianos (2018).

  116. 116.

    Bashir (2017).

  117. 117.

    Beikverdi and Song (2015).

  118. 118.

    Casey (2018).

  119. 119.

    Cant (2019).

  120. 120.

    Cong et al. (2018).

  121. 121.

    Corallo (2019).

  122. 122.

    Cong et al. (2018).

  123. 123.

    Werbach (2018).

  124. 124.

    Beikverdi and Song (2015).

  125. 125.

    Medium (2019).

  126. 126.

    Nazzini (2018); Finney (2018).

  127. 127.

    FTC (2010).

  128. 128.

    Lopatka (2000).

  129. 129.

    Massarotto (2020a).

  130. 130.

    Massarotto (2019b).

  131. 131.

    Hicks (1935).

  132. 132.

    May (1994).

  133. 133.

    Popper and Isaac (2020).

  134. 134.

    Frankel (2020).

  135. 135.

    Massarotto (2018).

  136. 136.

    Schneier (2019a).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Massarotto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Massarotto, G. (2022). Can Antitrust Trust Blockchain?. In: Portuese, A. (eds) Algorithmic Antitrust. Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85859-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85859-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85858-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85859-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics