Keywords

1 Introduction

What organizational features make a school a better place for teachers to teach and for students to learn has always been a very important question. Hoy (2012) identified three characteristics of schools that made a positive difference to student achievement after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES), namely (1) collective efficacy, (2) collective trust in parents and students, and (3) the academic emphasis of the school. In addition, school location can play an important role in education; schools in urban areas differ from schools in rural areas, and usually the former are associated with higher student performance. There are several explanations for this. Urban schools are usually larger, enjoy greater responsibility for resource allocation, and are less likely to experience staff shortages. Urban schools tend to have a higher proportion of qualified teachers, and higher student to teacher ratios than schools in rural areas and towns (OECD [Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development], 2013; for additional research into the effects of school location, see also chapter “Scaffolding the Learning in Rural and Urban Schools: Similarities and Differences”).

In public schools (state-funded), principals are also responsible for implementing standards, programs, and regulations set by higher educational authorities (such as government ministries) and related bodies. The role that principals play in schools is very important, as they are not only the administrators but also the initiators of many processes. As school managers, they should be school leaders who improve school processes and support high achievement among students (Malere & Ozola, 2019). Principals serve as the public representatives of their school. Elementary school principals provide direction and manage the overall operations of schools. They set and oversee academic goals, and ensure that teachers have the equipment and resources to meet those goals. Principals may establish and supervise additional programs in their school, such as counseling, extracurricular activities, and before- and after-school daycare. Principals clearly have an important management role, including responsibilities for teachers, curricula, and school budgets. They further facilitate cooperation with the students’ parents and the local community by listening to and addressing their concerns. Research has indicated that school environment created by the principal may have a significant influence on students’ mathematics and reading achievement (Alhosani et al., 2017; Dhuey & Smith, 2014).

Seven participants from the Dinaric region took part in TIMSS 2019, namely Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo,Footnote 1 Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia. Across the Dinaric region, elementary school principals typically undertake the following activities:

  • manage school activities and staff, including teachers and support personnel;

  • establish and oversee class schedules;

  • implement and maintain curriculum standards;

  • observe and evaluate teachers’ performance;

  • meet with parents and teachers to discuss students’ progress and behavior;

  • assess and prepare reports on test scores and other student achievement data;

  • organize professional development programs and workshops for staff;

  • establish and coordinate security procedures for students, staff, and visitors; and

  • manage the school budget, including the provision of school supplies, and maintenance.

Some research has suggested that the “formal” characteristics of principals may play an important role in student attainment. For example, a systematic review by Osborne-Lampkin et al. (2015) reported that principals’ years of experience and educational attainment were positively related to student achievement.

1.1 Framing the Research Questions

Our research analyses focus on connecting the professional characteristics of principals with school characteristics across the Dinaric region. We examined the relationship of these characteristics with student achievement to explore differences and similarities across the region.

Our review of the TIMSS 2019 regional data was designed to address four critical questions:

  1. (1)

    What are the licensing or certification requirements for principals across the Dinaric region?

  2. (2)

    What is the qualification level of principals? Is there an association between student mathematics and science achievement and principals’ education levels across the Dinaric region?

  3. (3)

    How many of years of professional experience do principals across the region have generally? Is there an association between student mathematics and science achievement scores and this experience?

  4. (4)

    Do school characteristics (school location, school composition by socioeconomic background, and school emphasis on academic success) differ among Dinaric education systems? Are these characteristics related to variation in student achievement?

2 Variables

For our research analyses, we selected relevant data collected by the TIMSS 2019 student school questionnaires, the latter completed by school principals (Table 1; for more details on the questionnaires, see TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, 2018). We analyzed the associations between these variables and student achievement scores in the TIMSS 2019 mathematics and science assessments using basic and advanced methods to estimate percentages, means, correlations, and develop regression models. We conducted statistical computations using established standard procedures for handling data from large-scale assessments (see Sect. 5 for more details on the data sources, and the analysis methods and tools that we used).

Table 1 List of variables and scales used in our analyses

In addition to the data collected by the TIMSS 2019 study, we collected information about specific requirements for principals across the region by preparing a short additional questionnaire that we distributed to national research coordinators in the Dinaric region. We used this questionnaire to collect information on:

  • relevant qualifying criteria for school principals;

  • certification for school principals;

  • models of professional development for school principals; and

  • number of years that school principals or school directors have held their mandate.

3 Results

3.1 Characteristics of School Principals and Relation to Student Achievement

In the Dinaric region, principals generally required at least five to eight years work experience in the education sector after acquiring their teaching degree before becoming a school principal, except in Kosovo where only three years of work experience were required (Table 2). By law, in Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, and Kosovo, school principals require a recognized university degree. In Croatia, school principals require a postgraduate university degree, with a total of at least eight years of work experience in schools or other institutions in the education system or in state administration bodies responsible for education (where at least five years should be acquired in education in school institutions). Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia have also implemented a model of professional development for school principals. Principals must complete a specialized school leadership training program in Albania, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia; in Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia, successful completion of this program gives school principals a license, which indicates that they have met the required level of general and professional competencies. In all education systems in Dinaric region, the school principal is selected after an open call has been issued, and, in general, school principals in the Dinaric region are appointed for a term of four years, although, in Croatia, their appointment is for five years and, in Albania, for an unlimited period. In Croatia and Serbia, principals can be reappointed multiple times; in Serbia, their prior position in school is held for two terms. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, and North Macedonia, the school principal can be appointed to a school no more than twice consecutively. All this is regulated by national legislation.

Table 2 Overview of qualifications required for a school principal position in the Dinaric region

Across the Dinaric region, Croatia reported the highest percentage of school principals with a master’s or a doctorate degree level qualification (96%), followed by Albania (51%) (Table 3). In most other systems in the region, the majority of schools are managed by a principal holding a degree at bachelor level or an equivalent (Table 3).

Table 3 Percentage of principals by educational level

For each level of principal qualification, we also analyzed the related percentages of students and their achievement differences in mathematics and science (see Table S.14 in the supplementary materials available for download at www.iea.nl/publications/RfEVol13). We found that the association between student achievement and principal education was only significant in Montenegro, where grade four students in schools where principals had completed a postgraduate degree tended to have a significantly higher achievement than students in schools where principals had only completed a bachelor’s degree or equivalent. They obtained, on average, 16 score points more in the TIMSS grade four mathematics test and 14 score points more in the TIMSS grade four science test.

One of the primary development strategies for principals is experience acquired during the course of their work, with a general expectation that principals become more effective with increased experience working in a position of that level. On average, across the Dinaric region, principals had less experience than the international TIMSS average (10 years); principals in North Macedonia had notably low levels of experience, while Serbia reported the highest average (Fig. 1; for a more detailed analysis, see Table S.15 in the supplementary materials available for download at www.iea.nl/publications/RfEVol13).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Average number of years of experience of school principals

Note In Kosovo and Serbia, the national defined population covers 90–95% of the national target population

When we analyzed the percentage of students by their principal’s number of years of experience, we found that, in North Macedonia, a staggering 71 percent of students were learning in primary schools managed by principals that had less than five years of experience (Fig. 2). This percentage was also significant in Kosovo (34%) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (57%). While Albania had the lowest percentage of principals with less than five years of experience, 28 percent of grade four students still had a principal with little experience of the role. The TIMSS international average was 31 percent; students in the Dinaric region are thus more likely to have less experienced principals than students in other parts of the world. Looking at the same topic from another angle, only about nine percent of students in North Macedonia learn in schools managed by principals with at least 10 years of experience, which is lower than in other systems in the region (13% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and >30% in Croatia, Kosovo, Serbia, and Montenegro).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of grade four students by their principal’s number of years of experience 

Note In Kosovo and Serbia, the national defined population covers 90–95% of the national target population

However, we found that the TIMSS 2019 grade four data for the Dinaric region did not provide any evidence of a relationship between student achievement and principals’ work experience. Calculating the correlation coefficient between the number of years of experience as a principal with the achievement of the students yielded no statistically significant results. Earlier research on this topic is ambiguous. Our findings are in agreement with some studies, where the data suggested that the experience of principals had no close relationship with academic achievement of students (Brockmeier et al., 2013; Gentilucci & Muto, 2007). In contrast, Dhuey and Smith (2014) reported that principal characteristics had significant effects on student achievement in mathematics and reading, and identified a weak relationship between principals’ levels of education and student test scores.

3.2 Characteristics of School

A variety of factors contribute to student achievement in mathematics and science, including student behaviors and student, teacher, and school characteristics. We focused on the school characteristics of school location, school composition by socioeconomic background, and school emphasis on academic success.

When comparing education systems across the Dinaric region, formative characteristics are important for contextualizing the findings. The number of people who live in the city, town, or area where the school is located may have an impact on students achievements in the Dinaric region. The Dinaric region generally has low levels of urbanization, and at least two-thirds of the region’s students attend schools located in villages or small towns. However, there is still considerable variation in school locations across the region (Fig. 3). In Albania and Kosovo, a third of students attend a school located in an area with 3000 people or less, while, conversely, nearly a third of students in Serbia learn in schools located in a place with more than 100,000 people (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentage of students by school location

Note In Kosovo and Serbia, the national defined population covers 90–95% of the national target population

We investigated whether student achievement was related to school location by comparing the TIMSS mathematics and science achievement of grade four students in schools in areas with >30,000 people to that of grade four students in schools in areas with ≤30,000 people (Table 4). Our results indicated that students from bigger cities achieved higher scores than their peers in smaller cities or rural areas; the achievement differences for both mathematics and science were significant across most of the Dinaric region, except for Kosovo and Montenegro. This difference was most pronounced in Albania, North Macedonia, and Serbia, where it exceeded 30 points for both mathematics and science (this corresponds to one-third of the standard deviation of the achievement scale score metric).

Table 4 Mathematics and science achievement difference by school location

There may be multiple reasons for similar clustering effects in the Dinaric region, for example, social segregation of residential areas (in combination with the tendency for children to attend nearby schools), fees for schools, lack of incentives for teachers to elect to work in more challenging areas, and/or better equipment in affluent schools because parents make additional financial contributions.

The social background of families is often reflected in the student intake of schools. Parents with similar backgrounds tend to send their children to schools where they will meet similar children (Cahill, 2009); this can boost the school-level effect on learning because children in more affluent schools may already start school with a higher “knowledge baseline” as a consequence of parental factors. We used the school principal responses about the socioeconomic background of the student body to group schools into three categories: “more affluent,” “neither more affluent nor more disadvantaged,” and “more disadvantaged” (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

School composition by principals’ assessments of the socioeconomic background of the school’s student body

Notes In Kosovo and Serbia, the national defined population covers 90–95% of the national target population. In Kosovo, data were available for ≥50% but <70% of the students

We noted that students from different backgrounds seemed to be strongly segregated in many schools in the Dinaric region (Fig. 4). The high percentage of students learning in disadvantaged schools in Albania is particularly noteworthy (almost half of Albania’s grade four students attend such schools). In Croatia, the comparable percentage was only 13 percent, while 57 percent of grade four students were reported as attending more affluent schools. In North Macedonia, only 10 percent of students attended “neither more affluent nor more disadvantaged” schools, but 66 percent attended more affluent schools.

We compared average student achievement scores for grade four students from schools with a more affluent student body with those of students from schools with a more disadvantaged student body (Fig. 5). The results indicated that students in more affluent schools tended to achieve higher mathematics and science scores in TIMSS 2019. These differences were generally significant, except in Bosnia and Herzegovina; in Kosovo, only the difference in mathematics achievement was significant. In Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia, the difference in both subjects was around 20 points, but, in Albania and North Macedonia, the difference exceeded 39 score points, amounting to almost half a standard deviation of the scale metric.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Difference in grade four student achievement scores by school socioeconomic background

Notes *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences. Positive values indicate higher achievement in more affluent schools compared to more disadvantaged schools. In Kosovo and Serbia, the national defined population covers 90–95% of the national target population

School emphasis on academic success generally plays an important role in supporting or stimulating students in their learning, and implies effective teaching, a motivated work environment, and high levels of expectation for student success.

In TIMSS 2019, principals were asked to report on their school’s emphasis on academic success. The TIMSS scale “school emphasis on academic success” (SEAS) (see Table 1) is related to a number of similar items aimed at measuring aspects of the school’s emphasis on academic success and the degree of support offered by the school organization and the school environment. Internationally, students who were classified as attending a school with “high or very high emphasis on academic success” are those with a scale score greater than or equal to 9.2. Students who were classified as attending a school with “medium emphasis on academic success” had a score lower than 9.2 (Table 5).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Percentages of students attending schools with different emphasis levels on academic success, based on principals’ assessments of their school culture

Overall, more than half of students in the region attended schools where principals reported there was a “very high” or “high” emphasis on academic success as part of the school’s culture (Fig. 6). The average scale score across the Dinaric region ranged from 9.3 in North Macedonia to 10.3 in Montenegro (Table 5).

We analyzed the correlation between SEAS and grade four student achievement across the region (Table 5). This correlation was very weak, but positive in all participating education systems in the region for both subjects. The correlation coefficients were statistically significant in Albania, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Serbia. This is in line with Bandura (1993) and Hoy et al. (2006) who confirmed a strong relationship between academic optimism and student achievement; they further stated that efficacy, trust, and positive academic emphases together produce a powerful force that engenders motivation, creates collective optimism, and channels student behavior toward the accomplishment of high academic goals. Schools with academic optimism create collective beliefs that changes are possible and all students can learn, inspiring a confidence that high academic performance can be achieved.

Table 5 School emphasis on academic success as reported by principals, and its correlation with grade four student achievement in TIMSS 2019

4 Conclusions

We analyzed the characteristics of principals and schools in the Dinaric region and the relationship of these characteristics with academic achievement of grade four students in TIMSS 2019. The focus of any principal is to manage the various processes in the school and support the professional activities of their teachers to create a successful learning environment for students. While we cannot address all aspects of a principal’s remit in our analyses, the TIMSS 2019 data provide useful information on their educational levels and number of years of experience as a principal, two factors that have been previously linked to student academic achievement (see Dhuey & Smith, 2014). While we were unable to identify a statistically significant relationship between these characteristics and grade four student mathematics and science achievement in our analyses of the TIMSS 2019 data, the role of the principal is undoubtedly a critical component in student achievement. They can establish a positive academic environment that embraces cognitive, emotional, and behavior elements; the positive interaction of all these elements creates a school culture of academic success.

It is essential that the management of the school creates an environment for learning and expects high achievement from the students because this facilitates and improves the achievement of the students. School principals should establish an environment and culture where all involved parties contribute toward supporting and improving student achievement.

There are also non-malleable factors that shape the learning environments of students. One of them is school location. We found that the level of urbanization of the area surrounding the school can also be related to student achievement. We observed that students in areas with more people demonstrated higher achievement scores in mathematics and science than students from schools located in less populated areas in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, North Macedonia, and Serbia (for further investigation into differences between urban and rural areas, see chapter “Scaffolding the Learning in Rural and Urban Schools: Similarities and Differences”). Conditions to promote students' learning tend to be better in urban schools, and this tendency is also reinforced by conditions for learning at home, which significantly correlates with higher student achievement.

The composition of the socioeconomic background of the student body of the school could also be related to grade four student mathematics and science achievement. In general, we found that children from more disadvantaged environments scored lower TIMSS achievement than students from more affluent schools. These differences in student achievement were statistically significant in Albania, Croatia, Kosovo (only for science), Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia.

While, across the Dinaric region, TIMSS 2019 data showed no significant relationships between principal characteristics and student achievement, we caution against underestimating the importance of principals. Although we were unable to empirically prove such relationships, this does not necessarily mean they do not exist, as there may be other characteristics associated with achievement that are not reported by TIMSS, and they may be interrelated and interdependent.

An important indicator in this analysis was school emphasis on academic success (as reported by school principals). We found that the correlation between the school emphasis on academic success (as reported by their principals) and grade four student mathematics and science achievement was positive for all participating systems in the region, and statistically significant in Albania, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Serbia. It is thus important that schools in the Dinaric region continue to promote an emphasis on academic success. School communities (principals, teachers, parents, and students) need to focus on working together to create a positive school climate that helps to establish students’ confidence in their abilities and motivate them to better achievement.