Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Usefulness Design Goals of Occupational Mobile Health Apps for Healthcare Workers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 (INTERACT 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12936))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2287 Accesses

Abstract

To improve healthcare professionals’ health and wellbeing at work, many available effective treatments including meditation, and workplace intervention, have been developed. However, the utilisation of these interventions is still limited. Currently, various mobile health applications (mHealth Apps) exist to help a wide range of users with different occupational health issues, such as stress, anxiety, and burnout. Despite their advantages, post-download uptake of mHealth apps by end-users remains low. Some of the reasons for this are poor usability, irrelevant or missing user-desired features, and poor user experience. This review paper explores the usefulness of mHealth Apps for the early detection of occupational-related ill-health among healthcare workers. Science Direct, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and SAGE Journal were searched comprehensively to identify relevant research articles. A total of 9546 reviewed papers were primarily identified through the systematic search on the databases. 2546 articles were removed from them, by duplication check on a RefWorks software. Titles and abstract screening of the remaining 126 led to 50 relevant articles being selected for full text screening. Of these 76 were excluded based on exclusion criteria. Finally, 19 articles were selected for a final inclusion to identify the relevant usefulness design goals, including usability, utility and user experience, deemed as critical for apps’ adoption and use. These goals include provide contextually relevant information, which is easy to understand for usability; support self-help guidance and in-depth knowledge for occupational health and wellbeing for utility: reinforced trust and perceived security in m-Health apps for user experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hse.gov.uk.: Health and safety statistics (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rajgopal, T.: Mental well-being at the workplace. Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med. 14, 63–65 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.75691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. New, long-standing cases of work-related ill health by type, 2019/20: The Labour Force Survey (LFS)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ravalier, J.M., McVicar, A., Boichat, C.: Work stress in NHS employees: a mixed-methods study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 6464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Solano Lopez, A.L.: Effectiveness of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program on blood pressure: a systematic review of literature. Worldviews Evid.-Based Nurs. 15, 344–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alameddine, M., Dainty, K.N., Deber, R., Sibbald, W.J.B.: The intensive care unit work environment: current challenges and recommendations for the future. J. Crit. Care. 24, 243–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schnall, R., Higgins, T., Brown, W., Carballo-Dieguez, A., Bakken, S.: Trust, perceived risk, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as factors related to mHealth technology use. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 216, 467–471 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alsswey, A., Al-Samarraie, H.: Elderly users’ acceptance of mHealth user interface (UI) design-based culture: the moderator role of age. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 14(1), 49–59 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-019-00307-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413–414 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koufaris, M.: Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 205–223 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDonald, C., Atwood, M.: What does it mean for a system to be useful?: an exploratory study of usefulness. Presented at the (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598600

  12. Aryana, B., Brewster, L., Abdelnour-Nocera, J.: Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory review (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yassaee, M., Mettler, T., Winter, R.: Principles for the design of digital occupational health systems. Inf. Organ. 29, 77–90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torquati, L., Kolbe-Alexander, T., Pavey, T., Leveritt, M.: Changing diet and physical activity in nurses: a pilot study and process evaluation highlighting challenges in workplace health promotion. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 50, 1015–1025 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richert, J., Lippke, S., Ziegelmann, J.P.: Intervention-engagement and its role in the effectiveness of stage-matched interventions promoting physical exercise. Res. Sports Med. 19, 145–161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2011.583164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Torous, J., Nicholas, J., Larsen, M.E., Firth, J., Christensen, H.: Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. Evid. Based Ment. Health 21, 116–119 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajan, J.V., et al.: Understanding the barriers to successful adoption and use of a mobile health information system in a community health center in São Paulo, Brazil: a cohort study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 16, 146 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0385-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liew, M.S., Zhang, J., See, J., Ong, Y.L.: Usability challenges for health and wellness mobile apps: mixed-methods study among mHealth experts and consumers. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7, e12160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/12160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clemmensen, T., Hertzum, M., Abdelnour-Nocera, J.: Ordinary user experiences at work: a study of greenhouse growers. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1–31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3386089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chandrashekar, P.: Do mental health mobile apps work: evidence and recommendations for designing high-efficacy mental health mobile apps. mHealth 4, 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2018.03.02

  21. Yen, P.-Y., Bakken, S.: Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc.: JAMIA 19, 413–422 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-0000

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurha Yingta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yingta, N., Nocera, J.A., Brew, O., Rehman, I.U. (2021). A Systematic Review of Usefulness Design Goals of Occupational Mobile Health Apps for Healthcare Workers. In: Ardito, C., et al. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021. INTERACT 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12936. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85606-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85607-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics