Skip to main content

Queer Becomings: The Ridiculous Theatrical Company’s Camille and Split Britches/Bloolips’ Belle Reprieve

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analysing Gender in Performance

Abstract

This essay provides new critical readings of two defining queer performances: The Ridiculous Theatrical Company’s Camille (1973) and Split Britches/Bloolips’ Belle Reprieve (1991), demonstrating how these two pieces reinforce a notion of queer be/coming from a comparative historical perspective. Edgecomb and Gillespie investigate how pastiche and drag are (re)envisioned in these performances to formulate approaches to camp that are distinctly queer, while also gender-specific, both reflecting and troubling the limited definitions of gender provided by the identity politics of the gay liberation movement and the decade following.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Video documentation of Belle Reprieve is available through the Hemispheric Institute’s Digital Video Library in the Split Britches video collection (http://hidvl.nyu.edu/video/p8cz8wk3.html). Images of the production and promotional materials, along with a history of the company, are available through Split Britches’ website (http://www.split-britches.com).

  2. 2.

    Camille was one of the most coveted roles for a nineteenth-century actress and was played by the most celebrated, including Sarah Bernhardt and Elenora Duse. The play would inspire Giuseppe Verdi to write his opera, La Traviata (1853), and also inspired dozens of silent films before the release of George Cukor’s starring Garbo in 1936. See Lintz, B. C. ‘Concocting La Dame aux Camellias: Blood, Tears, and Other Fluids’, Nineteenth-Century French Studies. Vol. 33, No. 3–4, pp. 549–63.

  3. 3.

    The American Psychiatric Association would not declassify homosexuality as a mental disorder until 1974. See Katz, J. (1995) ,Gay and American History: Lesbians and Gay Men in the United States. New York: Thomas Cromwell.

  4. 4.

    To read more about the origin of the Ridiculous genre, see Marranca, B., and Dasgupta, G. (1997) Theatre of the Ridiculous. New York: PAJ Books.

  5. 5.

    Dozens of interviews that I completed during my research for my book, Charles Ludlam Lives!, corroborate the political influence of Ludlam’s plays regardless of their original non-political intentions.

  6. 6.

    Because The Playhouse of the Ridiculous claimed ownership of Ludlam’s script, he renamed the play When Queens Collide and proceeded with his own production, the premiere of The Ridiculous Theatrical Company.

  7. 7.

    This era ushers in the rise of identity politics in the complex, polychromatic landscape of the United States in the last quarter of the twentieth century when the gay community would face entirely new challenges with the nightmare of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Although HIV had been present in the United States since at least the 1960s, the disease entered the mainstream media and public consciousness on 11 May 1982 when The New York Times reported on GRID (gay-related immune deficiency). Following the sexual freedom of the post-Stonewall period, the disease came on with a ferocious speed that would change gay culture forever. Urban centres with substantial gay male populations, including New York City and San Francisco, became the failing heart of the epidemic and the larger cultural response was split between fearful silence and rampant homophobia. AIDS hit the arts community (theatre, dance, design) particularly hard, with almost an entire generation of gay men being wiped out in the 1980s and 1990s. Sadly, this would include Charles Ludlam in 1987, as well as several other original members of the Ridiculous Theatrical Company. For more about HIV/AIDS and theatre, see Román, D. (1998) Acts of Intervention: Performance, Gay Culture and AIDS. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  8. 8.

    Casting Blanche as a drag queen and Stanley as a butch lesbian foregrounds the queerness inherent to those roles, recalling the accusations made against Tennessee Williams in 1966, following the play’s premiere, by New York Times critic Stanley Kauffmann. He claimed that Williams was masking homosexual experiences behind his female characters since queers were not permitted on Broadway stages (Kauffmann, p. 1).

  9. 9.

    Stylistically, the play is a hybrid of realism and expressionism, but the conventions of the genre from a narrative standpoint still hold true.

  10. 10.

    It is also important to note that, in Williams’ play, Blanche’s psychological breakdown was largely caused by the suicide of her presumably gay husband long before the play begins.

  11. 11.

    As Case argues, ‘From a theatrical standpoint, butch-femme roles take on the quality of something more like a character construction … these roles qua roles lend agency and self-determination to the historically passive subject, providing her with at least two options for gender identification and with the aid of camp, an irony that allows her perception to be constructed from outside ideology, with a gender role that makes her appear as if she is inside of it’ (Case 2009, pp. 36, 41).

  12. 12.

    Sue-Ellen Case documents that in the notebooks for Belle Reprieve, Shaw and Weaver referred to the performance as ‘four actors escaping from a script—a heterosexual script’ (Case 1996, p. 28).

Bibliography

  • Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, S.E. (1996) “Introduction,” Split Britches: Lesbian Practice/Feminist Performance. (London and New York: Routledge) pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, S.E. (2009) “Towards a Butch-Femme Aesthetic.” Feminist and Queer Performance: Critical Strategies. (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davy, K. (2007) “Fe/Male Impersonation: The Discourse of Camp,” Critical Theory and Performance. Reneilt, J. & Roach, J. (eds.). (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, E. (1997) Unmaking Mimesis: Essays on Feminism and Theatre. (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, J. (2010) Theatre & Sexuality. (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edgecomb, S. (2017) Charles Ludlam Lives!: Charles Busch, Bradford Louryk, Taylor Mac and the Queer Legacy of the Ridiculous Theatrical Company. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gussow, M. (1973) “Ludlam Star of ‘Camille’ in Title Role”, The New York Times, 4 May, sec. L p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, W. (1991) “A Sendup of Streetcar,” The New York Times, 11 Mar.: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/11/theater/review-theater-a-sendup-of-streetcar.html

  • Horowitz, K. (2013) “The Trouble with ‘Queerness’: Drag and the Making of Two Cultures. Signs. 38:2 (Winter), pp. 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. (2000) Ridiculous!: The Theatrical Life and Times of Charles Ludlam. (New York: Applause Theatre and Cinema Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffmann, S. (1966) “Homosexual Drama and Its Disguises,” The New York Times, 23 Jan, sec 2, p 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlam, C. (1989) The Complete Plays of Charles Ludlam. (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlam, C. (1992) Ridiculous Theatre: Scourge of Human Folly: The Essays and Opinions of Charles Ludlam. Samuels, S (ed). (New York: Theatre Communications Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (2011). “Albertine and the Inverted Mirrors: Reflections of Geographic and Ethnic Otherness,” French Forum. 36:2–3, Spring/Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffalo, D. (2009) Post-Queer Politics. (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P., L. Weaver, B. Bourne, P. Shaw. (1996) Belle Reprieve. In Split Britches: Lesbian Practice/Feminist Performance. Sue-Ellen Case (ed.). (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 149–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, E. (2016). “Brechtian”: A Clarification. 4th Wall Dramaturgy. https://4thwalldramaturgy.byu.edu/brechtian-a-clarification.

  • Sontag, S. (1966) “Notes on ‘Camp’”, Against Interpretation, and Other Essays. (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (1947) A Streetcar Named Desire. (New York: New American Library).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean F. Edgecomb .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Edgecomb, S.F., Gillespie, B. (2022). Queer Becomings: The Ridiculous Theatrical Company’s Camille and Split Britches/Bloolips’ Belle Reprieve. In: Halferty, J.P., Leeney, C. (eds) Analysing Gender in Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85574-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics