Abstract
This study is aimed to evaluate the comprehensibility of 40 safety prohibition signs in accordance with China’s current national standards and their relevance to three ergonomic principles (familiarity, physical representation, and conceptual compatibility) of sign design, thereby discovering signs of poor comprehensibility. Twenty elderly people aged 60 and above were included in this study for the sign comprehensibility test and ergonomics principles evaluation test. The results revealed that there were 13 signs with a correct comprehensibility rate of 0, and no signs had a comprehensibility rate of greater than 67% specified in ISO 3864–3 (2006). A lot of signs with poor comprehensibility need to be redesigned, which should abide by ergonomics principles, thereby improving people’s comprehension. This study can provide a sound theoretical basis for researchers and designers when improving these signs to design comprehensible signs for safety enhancement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Redström, J.: Towards user design? on the shift from object to user as the subject of design. J. Des. Stud. 27(2), 123–139 (2006)
Bañares, J.R., Caballes, S.A., Serdan, M.J., Liggayu, A.T., Bongo, M.F.: A comprehension-based ergonomic redesign of philippine road warning signs. J. Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics 65, 17–25 (2018)
McCormick, E.J., Sanders, M.S.: Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York City (1982)
Liu, Y.C., Ho, C.H.: The effects of age on symbol comprehension in central rail hubs in Taiwan. Appl. Ergon. 43(6), 1016–1025 (2012)
GB2894- 2008.《安全标志及其使用导则》. 中华人民共和国标准 (2008). (in Chinese)
Ben-Bassat, T., Shinar, D.: Ergonomic guidelines for traffic sign design increase sign comprehension. J. Hum. Factors 48(1), 182–195 (2006)
ISO 3864, 1984. International Standard for Safety Colors and Safety Signs. International Standards Organization (ISO), Geneva (1984)
ISO 9186–1, 2014. Graphical Symbols-Test Methods- Part1: Methods for Testing Comprehensibility, second ed. International Standards Organization (ISO), Geneva (2014)
ISO 9186, 2001. Graphical Symbols—test Methods for Judged Comprehensibility and for Comprehension. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2001)
ISO 3864–3, 2006. International Standard for Safety Colors and Safety Signs-part 3: Design Principles for Graphical Symbols for Use in Safety Signs. International Standards Organization (ISO), Geneva (2006)
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the teachers and students who helped complete this study and the subjects who participated in the experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, R., Wan, Y. (2022). Evaluation on the Comprehensibility of China’s Safety Prohibition Signs Based on Ergonomic Principles. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V. IHIET 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_160
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_160
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85539-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85540-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)