Skip to main content

Information Systems Research as a Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scientific Research in Information Systems

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss some fundamental characteristics of science as a process and as a product. The chapter introduces key characteristics of scientific products, such as theories, evidence, or measurement. It also introduces basic principles of scientific inquiry, such as replicability, independence, precision, and falsification. In total, this chapter introduces a vocabulary for understanding information systems research as a science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Galileo initially endured significant resistance to his findings because his measurement instrument, the telescope, was not trusted as a scientific instrument. It took decades of replication, a scientific principle I explain below, before his findings were confirmed to the extent that they were trusted as valid observational evidence.

  2. 2.

    Refining measurements remains relevant to this day. For example, improvements in neuroscientific measurement methods like fMRI scanners have recently been developed and provide much more precise measurements of brain activities than any other measurement instrument previously used in cognitive psychology.

  3. 3.

    These statements do not qualify these research inquiries as good or bad; they are merely used to distinguish different types of research.

References

  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods and Practices (2nd ed.). Global Text Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones, A., & Lee, A. S. (2017). Thinking About Measures and Measurement in Positivist Research: A Proposal for Refocusing on Fundamentals. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What Is This Thing Called Science? (3rd ed.). Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (2010). Against Method (4th ed.). Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. (2019). Against Theory: With Apologies to Feyerabend. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(9), 1340–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (1997). Interpretive Research in Information Systems. In J. Mingers & F. Stowell (Eds.), Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? (pp. 239–268). McGraw- Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Videos. (2016). Is There a Reproducibility Crisis in Science? Scientific American. Retrieved January 18, 2020 from https://www.scientificamerican.com/video/is-there-a-reproducibility-crisis-in-science/

  • Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books (Logik der Forschung, Vienna, 1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. (1971). A Primer in Theory Construction. Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995a). The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995b). Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, E. (2012). Replication Studies: Bad Copy. Nature, 485(7398), 298–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Recker, J. (2021). Information Systems Research as a Science. In: Scientific Research in Information Systems. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85436-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics