Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(27), 12107–12109.
Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories : The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077720
Banerjee, N., Song, L., & Hasemyer, D. (2015). Exxon: The road not taken. Retrieved from https://insideclimatenews.org/content/Exxon-The-Road-Not-Taken
Bogart, L. M., & Bird, S. T. (2003). Exploring the relationship of conspiracy beliefs about HIV/AIDS to sexual behaviors and attitudes among African-American adults. Journal of the National Medical Association, 95(11), 1057.
Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. (2005). Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 38(2), 213–218.
Braman, D., Kahan, D., & Grimmelmann, J. (2005). Modeling facts, culture, and cognition in the gun debate. Social Justice Research, 18(3), 283–304.
Bronner, G. (2015). Belief and misbelief asymmetry on the internet. Wiley.
Chinn, S., Hart, P. S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and polarization in climate change news content, 1985-2017. Science Communication, 42(1), 112–129.
Climate Investigation Center. (2020, September 29). Climatefiles – Hard to find documents all in one place. Retrieved from www.climatefiles.com
Cook, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2016). Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 160–179.
Cook, J., van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Lewandowsky, S. (2018). The consensus handbook.
Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? The European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2–4.
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35.
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 111–119.
Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9587–9592.
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (Vol. 1, pp. 144–160). Oxford University Press.
Fagan, M., & Huang, C. (2019, April). A look at how people around the world view climate chang. Factank – News in the numbers. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/18/a-look-at-how-people-around-the-world-view-climate-change/
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
Gardner, B., & Rebar, A. L. (2019). Habit formation and behavior change. In Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press.
Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2020). Identifying the most important predictors of support for climate policy in the United States. Behavioural Public Policy, 5, 1–23.
Hall, S. (2015). Exxon Knew about Climate Change almost 40 years ago. Scientific American, Online October 26, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/ Retrieved 19 June 2021.
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723.
Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1994). Conspiracies, contagion, and compassion: Trust and public reactions to AIDS. AIDS Education and Prevention, 6, 365–375.
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6, 622–626.
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Clim Change, 8, 614–620.
Information Council for the Environment. (1991). Mission statement – Strategies; reposition warming as theory (Not Fact). In. American Meteorological Society Archives.
IFOP. (2018). Enquête sur le complotisme, ConspiracyWatch and Foundation Jean Jaurès. Available at: https://jean-jaures.org/sites/default/files/redac/commun/productions/2018/0108/115158_-_rapport_02.01.2017.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014a). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One, 9(2), e89177.
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014b). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35–56.
Kahan, D. M. (2012). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. SSRN Electronic Journal, 8(4), 407–424.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011a). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174.
Kahan, D. M., Wittlin, M., Peters, E., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. N. (2011b). The tragedy of the risk-perception commons: culture conflict, rationality conflict, and climate change. Temple University legal studies research paper (2011–26).
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735.
Karakas, L. D., & Mitra, D. (2020). Believers vs. deniers: Climate change and environmental policy polarization. European Journal of Political Economy, 65, 101948.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480.
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., … Gustafson, A. (2019). Climate change in the American mind: April 2019. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
Lewandowsky, S. (2019). In whose hands the future. In S. Lewandowsky & J. E. Uscinski (Eds.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 149–177). Oxford University Press.
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Motivated rejection of science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 217–222.
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013a). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One, 8(10), e75637.
Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013b). NASA faked the moon landing—Therefore,(climate) science is a hoax an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622–633.
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., & Lloyd, E. (2018). The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: Simulating coherence by conspiracism. Synthese, 195(1), 175–196.
McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 395–409.
Nichols, T. (2014). The death of expertise: The Campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. Retrieved from http://thefederalist.com/2014/01/17/the-death-of-expertise/
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of GeneralPsychology, 2(2), 175–220.
Norgaard, K. M. (2006). “We don’t really want to know” – Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization & Environment, 19(3), 347–370.
O’Neill, B. C., Oppenheimer, M., Warren, R., Hallegatte, S., Kopp, R. E., Pörtner, H. O., … Yohe, G. (2017). IPCC reasons for concern regarding climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 7(1), 28–37.
Oleksy, T., Wnuk, A., Maison, D., & Łyś, A. (2020). Content matters. Different predictors and social consequences of general and government-related conspiracy theories on COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110289.
Oreskes, N. (2004). Beyond the ivory tower. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686.
Oreskes, N. (2018). The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we’re not wrong? In Climate modelling (pp. 31–64). Springer.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
Rutjens, B. T., Heine, S. J., Sutton, R. M., & van Harreveld, F. (2018). Attitudes towards science. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 125–165). Elsevier.
Uscinski, J. E., & Olivella, S. (2017). The conditional effect of conspiracy thinking on attitudes toward climate change. Research & Politics, 4(4), 2053168017743105.
Uscinski, J. E., Douglas, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Climate change conspiracy theories. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. Oxford University Press.
Van der Linden, S. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173.
Wagner-Egger, P., Bangerter, A., Gilles, I., Green, E., Rigaud, D., Krings, F., … Clémence, A. (2011). Lay perceptions of collectives at the outbreak of the H1N1 epidemic: Heroes, villains and victims. Public Understanding of Science, 20(4), 461–476.
Wagner-Egger, P., Delouvée, S., Gauvrit, N., & Dieguez, S. (2018). Creationism and conspiracism share a common teleological bias. Current Biology, 28(16), R867–R868.
West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506.