Skip to main content

The Origins and Evolution of Design: A Stage-Based Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biosemiotics and Evolution

Abstract

Within a broader definition of design, as the conception and planning of everything that is artificial, the place of tools is central. With the help of cognitive semiotics in general and Donald’s theory of the evolution of the human mind in particular, we propose a stage model for the evolution of design, consisting of four stages: Proto-design, Simple design, Complex design, and Advanced design, some of which are further divided into substages. We argue that nonhuman animals are capable of Proto-design, but it is only with the advent of stone tool technology in hominins that we witness Simple design. The stages are individuated based on evidence from archaeology and cognitive science, but also on the particular semiotic resources that are novel for each stage: mimesis-based gestures, speech, drawings, and polysemiotic communication. The model suggests both continuities and relative discontinuities in the evolution of design, and more generally, in human bio-cultural evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Capital letters are used to distinguish the sign systems themselves from particular manifestations of them, such as individual languages, culturally shaped gestures, or practices such as painting (see Zlatev et al. 2020).

  2. 2.

    As pointed out by Zlatev (2007: 320): “The adjective ‘bodily’ distinguishes bodily mimesis from the broader concept of mimesis with Aristotelean roots.”

  3. 3.

    There are reasons for contesting several aspects of Donald’s model, but this is not our topic at present. See papers in Dunér and Sonesson eds. (2016).

  4. 4.

    For a different kind of critique of the notion of “internal representations” (but not external ones, which correspond to signs), see Thompson (2007) and Sonesson (2015b).

References

  • Acha J (2009) Introducción a la Teoría de los Diseños. Editorial Trillas, Ciudad de México

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri M (2008) Life is semiosis. Cosm Hist J Nat Soc Philos 4(1–2):29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef O (2017) Can archaeology tell us about the evolution of cognition and language? J Neurolinguistics 43:222–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayasid N (2004) Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Des Issues 6(1):16–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Casakin H, Kreitler S (2011) The cognitive profile of creativity in design. Think Skills Creat 6:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Sasso G, Maritana L, Salvatori S, Mazzolia C, Artioli G (2014) Discriminating pottery production by image analysis: a case study of Mesolithic and Neolithic pottery from Al Khiday (Khartoum, Sudan). J Archaeol Sci 46:125–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donald M (1991) Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald M (2012) The mimetic origins of language. In: Tallerman M, Gibson K (eds) The Oxford handbook of language evolution. OUP, Oxford, pp 180–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald M (2013) Mimesis theory re-examined, twenty years after the fact. In: Hatfield G, Pittman H (eds) Evolution of mind, brain and culture. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp 169–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunér D (2016) Science: the structure of scientific evolutions. In: Dunér D, Sonesson G (eds) Human Lifeworlds: the cognitive semiotics of cultural evolution. Peter Lang Edition, Frankfurt am Main, pp 229–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunér D, Sonesson G (2016) Encounters: the discovery of the unknown. In: Dunér D, Sonesson G (eds) Human Lifeworlds: the cognitive semiotics of cultural evolution. Peter Lang Edition, Frankfurt am Main, pp 267–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich JP (2017) The secret of our success: how culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes CM (2018) Cognitive gadgets: the cultural evolution of thinking. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J (2008) Semiotics: an examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt G, Rutledge B, Gray R (2006) The right tool for the job: what strategies do wild new Caledonian crows use? Anim Cogn 9:307–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford JR (2007) The origins of meaning: language in the light of evolution. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Itkonen E (2005) Analogy as structure and process: approaches in linguistics, cognitive psychology and philosophy of science. Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Konderak P (2018) Mind, cognition, semiosis: ways to cognitive semiotics. UMCS Press, Lublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1996) On Interobjectivity. Mind Cult Act 3(4):228–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey M (1979) Olduvai Gorge. Book Club Associates, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenninger S (2016) Pictures: perceptions of realism in the service of communication. In: Dunér D, Sonesson G (eds) Human Lifeworlds: the cognitive semiotics of cultural evolution. Peter Lang Edition, Frankfurt am Main, pp 97–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Stasko J (2010) Mental models, visual reasoning and interaction in information visualization: a top-down perspective. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 16(6):999–1008

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malafouris L (2013) How things shape the mind: a theory of material engagement. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew W (2013) Is primate tool use special? Chimpanzee and new Caledonian crow compared. Phil Trans R Soc Biol Sci 368:20120422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Collazos J (2016) Design semiotics with an agentive approach: an alternative to current semiotic analysis of artefacts. In: Zlatev J, Sonesson G, Konderak P (eds) Meaning, mind and communication—explorations in cognitive semiotics. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp 83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Collazos J, Sonesson G (2020) Revisiting the life of things in Amazonia: a cognitive semiotic approach to the Agency of Artefacts. Pub J Cogn Semiot 9(2):30–52. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2020.9.22012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niño D (2015) Elementos de Semiótica Agentiva. Utadeo, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg I (2009) The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J (1983) Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Semaw S, Renne P, Harris J, Feibel C, Bernor R, Fesseha N, Mowbray K (1997) 2.5-million-year-old stone tools from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature 385:333–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Shaik C, Deaner R, Merril M (1999) The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture. J Hum Evol 36:719–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone M (2011) The primacy of movement. Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson G (1999) Postphotography and beyond. From mechanical reproduction to digital production. In: Sonesson G (ed) VISIO, 4, 1: Postphotography, p 11–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson G (2009a) New considerations on the proper study of man—and, marginally, some other animals. Cogn Semiot 4:133–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson G (2009b) View from Husserl’s lectern. Cybern Hum Know 16(3–4):107–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson G (2015a) Le jeu de la valeur et du sens. In: Biglari A (ed) Valeur. Aux fondements de la sémiotique. L’Harmattan, Paris, pp 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson G (2015b) The mirror in-between picture and mind. A phenomenologically inspired approach to cognitive semiotics. Chin Semiot Stud 11(2):159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson G (2019) The evolution of thinking. Cognitive semiotics in between deep history and the history of mentalities. In: Dunér D, Ahlberger C (eds) Cognitive history. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 35–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout D, Chaminade T (2007) The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia 45:1091–1100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stout D, Passingham R, Frith C, Apel J, Chaminade T (2011) Technology, expertise and social cognition in human evolution. Eur J Neurosci 33:1328–1338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tallis R (2011) Aping mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the misrepresentation of humanity. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson E (2007) Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønnessen M (2016) Agency in biosemiotics and enactivism. In: Zlatev J, Sonesson G, Konderak P (eds) Meaning, mind and communication—explorations in cognitive semiotics. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp 69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaesen K (2012) The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behav Brain Sci 35:203–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten A, Schick K, Toth N (2009) The evolution and cultural transmission of percussive technology: integrating evidence from palaeoanthropology and primatology. J Hum Evol 57:420–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn T (2012) The Palaeolithic record. In: Gibson K, Tallerman M (eds) The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2003) Meaning = life (+ culture). Evol Commun 4(2):255–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2007) Embodiment, language and mimesis. In: Ziemke T, Zlatev J, Frank R (eds) Body, language and mind, volume 1: embodiment. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2008) From proto-mimesis to language: evidence from primatology and social neuroscience. J Physiol PAR 102:137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2009) The semiotic hierarchy: life, consciousness, signs and language. Cogn Semiot 4:170–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2015) Cognitive semiotics. In: Trifonas P (ed) International handbook of semiotics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1043–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2016) Preconditions in human embodiment for the evolution of symbolic communication. In: Etzelmüller G, Tewes C (eds) Embodiment in evolution and culture. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2018) Meaning making from life to language: the semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cogn Semiot 11(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J (2019) Mimesis theory, learning and polysemiotic communication. In: Peters M (ed) Encclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev J, Żywiczyński P, Wacewicz S (2020) Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. J Lang Evol 5(2):156–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzaa006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank David Dunér, Josie Dixon, and Vaughan Phillips for feedback on an early version of this chapter; and the History Museum at Lund University for an inspiring environment of a variety of tools from the Stone Age. In addition, we would like to thank Aaron Stutz and Przemyslaw Żywiczyński, as well as two anonymous reviewers, for their fruitful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Mendoza-Collazos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mendoza-Collazos, J., Zlatev, J., Sonesson, G. (2021). The Origins and Evolution of Design: A Stage-Based Model. In: Pagni, E., Theisen Simanke, R. (eds) Biosemiotics and Evolution. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85265-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics